Retrain Button

Printable View

July 8th, 2015
Tisguyz

Retrain Button

I've give this a lot of thought and I want a retrain button. It would just be above the edit army button in army overview, when you press edit army it disappears. It would take the army you used in your last raid and retrain it, this would be very useful for farming, that way your barch doesn't go 170 barbs and 30 archers(its happened before) or for war when you use the same two armies for both of your attacks. Personally, I like symmetrical things and with level 9 and ten barracks, when I usually manually retrain my barch, it comes out uneven and I'm very annoyed (is it just me?)
July 8th, 2015
fraserjts

I agree with this, but don't u think a saved army button would be better where u could have 5 or 10 (depend on TH lvl just like saved bases when you unlock more)
Would be useful for farming, pushing and war!
July 8th, 2015
Tex6170

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraserjts

I agree with this, but don't u think a saved army button would be better where u could have 5 or 10 (depend on TH lvl just like saved bases when you unlock more)
Would be useful for farming, pushing and war!

Saving multiple armies is ruled out, but having a re-train button isn't. I actually support the re-train button.
July 8th, 2015
fraserjts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tex6170

Saving multiple armies is ruled out, but having a re-train button isn't. I actually support the re-train button.

That's a shame.
Just wondering why (if it wasn't ruled out) you would rather retrain?
July 9th, 2015
ClasherGirl99

Good loophole spotting, and good idea!
July 9th, 2015
Antdroid

Add this........
August 29th, 2015
Tisguyz

Invisible Bump
Yes, I know this will get me in a lot of trouble
August 29th, 2015
bpay27

I think this would be great. So many people request this and this seems like the loop hole around it. The only thing people can say about why this is ruled out is because it can be exploited by some software out there blah blah blah. This would be very beneficial to everyone. It's probably one of the top 5 requested topics too. This idea needs to be reconsidered. Sometimes I think things are just ruled out cause SC doesn't want to put in the time to make it work. If they really tried they could make it hac proof.