Another request for heroes in war.

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

July 3rd, 2015
MrShaun

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzAudi

You have a digital wpb ? Or is it a digital round filing cabinet ?

Seriously this topic and its variations are done to death. But I still maintain that on this forum, as many people don’t care one way or other, as have a firm opinion on the topic.

So why bother clicking on the post? You already knew kind of what was going to be said?

If you dont want a way for us to get heroes easier for war with out having to spend loads on gems, That's fine. Go create a thread about it.

Your either a troll and know what your doing or have mental health problems.

Dont quote me again, your comments are worthless.
July 3rd, 2015
rwelshjr

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzAudi

Oh come on. You know it is not a nonsense response. Your challenge to my post is about as “superior” as mine.
You know very well nothing can be added to the debate. We have read it all before.

There is no valid empirical evidence here. Polls and census ? All active players ? No. This is a tiny forum. Read my post abovr.

More than a few of us are tired of others claiming to speak for us.

I am not superior, sorry if I sounded like that so here is my disclaimer. Its just that what you said was so silly it came out as a challenge. And regarding your suggestion that folks have not read the forum? - yes, I have read the forum. A lot and for a long time. I have seen and engaged in many of these discussions. I am eyewitness to all those polls and petitions. (as mentioned they were so numerous I was getting annoyed and sick of them)

No one is speaking for you just by saying its a vast majority. You are not part of that vast majority you have made that clear. And its ok too. By all means argue your points. Just keep it real as you do.

But you are like trying to say the truth is not true. That its a vast majority is basically just a given.

If you are opposed to the idea try instead arguing the reasons SC might not do it vast majority or otherwise. Note I mention those to and acknowledge they may be fair. If you presented your arguments on that basis instead I might agree with you.
July 3rd, 2015
Kennnnnnn

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzAudi

Oh come on. You know it is not a nonsense response. Your challenge to my post is about as “superior” as mine.
You know very well nothing can be added to the debate. We have read it all before.

There is no valid empirical evidence here. Polls and census ? All active players ? No. This is a tiny forum. Read my post abovr.

More than a few of us are tired of others claiming to speak for us.

You sound a little bit like me now. You might have learned my dog tricks. That's a good sign... Or probably bad! XD

Regarding the topic, I think the amount of gems to be spent for this has to be lowered down a bit.
Or it depends on the level of heroes. The higher the level, the more gems needed to fund its usage.
July 3rd, 2015
ropepirate

What I want to know is why can't people accept the explanation given by SC about the technical difficulties in making heroes available for war?

Whilst, I agree, that it is probably a lucrative money maker for SC you have also got to take into account that heroes don't act like any other unit/building in the game and they take bits and pieces from each of them which,as far as I can see, makes any changes to the way they operate a lot harder to do than it is for any single other unit/building.

Personally I believe that if it was something as simple as them not trying to lose a cash cow an option like the one the OP suggest, pay an amount of gems to use them offensively in war, would have been implemented by SC by now.
July 3rd, 2015
MrShaun

Quote:

Originally Posted by ropepirate

What I want to know is why can't people accept the explanation given by SC about the technical difficulties in making heroes available for war?

Whilst, I agree, that it is probably a lucrative money maker for SC you have also got to take into account that heroes don't act like any other unit/building in the game and they take bits and pieces from each of them which,as far as I can see, makes any changes to the way they operate a lot harder to do than it is for any single other unit/building.

Personally I believe that if it was something as simple as them not trying to lose a cash cow an option like the one the OP suggest, pay an amount of gems to use them offensively in war, would have been implemented by SC by now.

Supercell have a huge declopment team. To believe sc can't edit or add script to the game to allow this to happen would be a little naive in my opinion. Let me have access to there servers and I'll sort it out in a few hours 😂
July 3rd, 2015
paulting

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrShaun

Now before a mod jumps to delete this, I did do a quick search to see if anyone else has requested my idea. I couldn't find one, but wouldn't be surprised if its out there some where.

Any way, we all know the vast majority of players want to be able to use upgrading heroes in war.

We also know Supercell probably dont want to lose the money gained in people willing to gem them.

So here is my suggestion, a kind of meet half way method. Why not allow us to pay gems to use them in war.

For example it could be 50 gems to use each hero in war if they are upgrading. So that is still a potential 100 gems spent and we get what we want. 50gems is still high enough for players to have to buy them, and is low enough for people that dont want to spend a lot. This way more people would be spending gems on heroes than previously. I dont think this change would affect SC revenue much if at all as it would open gemming heroes to more players.

If this idea has previously been suggested then apologies, and fully understand that it's to be deleted.

Thanks for reading ;)

Bad idea though, i would just think they should be alive in war even if they are upgrading like defensive buildings
July 3rd, 2015
OzAudi

Quote:

Originally Posted by rwelshjr

Just keep it real as you do.

But you are like trying to say the truth is not true. That its a vast majority is basically just a given.

Again, there is no valid empirical evidence to accept the “vast majority is basically a given”. That is the simple fact.

The entire forum was not polled. A representative portion of the forum was not polled. And this forum does not necessarily represent the entire CoC community.

Just trying to keep it real.
July 3rd, 2015
ropepirate

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrShaun

Supercell have a huge declopment team. To believe sc can't edit or add script to the game to allow this to happen would be a little naive in my opinion. Let me have access to there servers and I'll sort it out in a few hours ��

But they don't have a large development team, they operate in small cells each small team working on a separate game. Take a look at this page to learn a bit more about them - http://supercell.com/en/our-story/
July 3rd, 2015
Herpacleese

Being bored, tired or nauseated with a threads topic is in no way a reason to dileberately derail said thread.
July 3rd, 2015
MrShaun

Quote:

Originally Posted by paulting

Bad idea though, i would just think they should be alive in war even if they are upgrading like defensive buildings

I agree, in an ideal situation that would be the case.

But like I said its a chance to meet halfway. SC still get people using gems, and we get Heroes in war for less of the cost.(unless your heroes have hardly any upgrading time left)

Was just a suggestion, and as far as I'm aware no one has offered SC an alternative to just "Put upgrading heroes into war"

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page