Boosting Builders

So everyone knows you can use gems to instantly obtain loot, troops, and spells, or you can boost collectors, barracks, etc. With builders however, you can instantly upgrade buildings, but you can't boost the builder that is working. I am suggesting that you add a feature to boost a builder 2x speed for a few hours, or maybe a day. You would activate this just as you would any other speed boost, tapping on the building (in this case builder hut) and tap boost. When you tapped on a builder hut and tapped info, it would show what building the builder is working on and how much time is left.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ildigrub

So everyone knows you can use gems to instantly obtain loot, troops, and spells, or you can boost collectors, barracks, etc. With builders however, you can instantly upgrade buildings, but you can't boost the builder that is working. I am suggesting that you add a feature to boost a builder 2x speed for a few hours, or maybe a day. You would activate this just as you would any other speed boost, tapping on the building (in this case builder hut) and tap boost. When you tapped on a builder hut and tapped info, it would show what building the builder is working on and how much time is left.

---

I was about to suggest this (but I go for 4x than your speed input for uniformity)! Hahaha... Anyway, I'll try to make a tl;dr and include this! Thanks! :thumbsup:

Ruled out read sticky

Ruled out and often suggested.

Please read stickies and learn to search the forum before starting new threads.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kowalski711

Ruled out read sticky

---

But then again, anything to prevent zapping storages was ruled out too... :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Freyrix

But then again, anything to prevent zapping storages was ruled out too... :p

---

I knew this would appear. Ruled out does not mean “not being considered”. It is currently ruled out and therefore these threads are in breach of forum rules.

It’s common practice in IT project management (and other project types too), to shut down discussions especially when they offer no further useful opinion or ideas. Continued discussion once action is determined viable, favourable or necessary often leads to further misunderstanding when updates are finally presented to the public. That’s exactly what has happened in the zapper/anti-zapper debate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fanboy73

Not ruled out and currently on the list of considered ideas, please read the sticky

---

Yep. Willing to be corrected on this. Not currently ruled.

Regardless, the fact it is mentioned in the relevant sticky, means this thread is still in breach of forum rules.