infinite barrack space

1. What's the point? Just because you're too lazy to retrain troops?
2. storing up elixir. YES, I know it's only for the duration of the boost, but one could easily store up all elixir, then put their TH outside to get a shield.
3. Ruled out idea.

Terrible idea in every way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChiefJCS801

when raiding with barch or something similar, you have to keep retraining, which is annoying

i think there should be infinite barrack space but ONLY WHILE BOOSTING BARRACKS

so elixir storing will not be a problem because people have to boost

when the boost ends, the extra troops in queue over the 75th troop (in the case of level 10 barracks) will be removed and refunded

---

Have to agree that this has too many ways of being exploited

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ironagedave

We said the name change wouldn't happen but it did... ok a copmprimise of one time only.

but more importantly zapping immunity we said would never happen ... but hey look at the latest update.

The OP has actually thought about this one. To boost you use gems you are unlikely to abuse something if you have to pay with gems. The fact that you can run out of production of troops if your searching for the right base takes a long enough time - devalues the use of the boost baracks, alternatively increasing the troop que capacity to 120 each would be another viable alternative and may be less complex to introduce to the game and would equate to 2 extra stored armies worth.

---

yes thats a better idea, or maybe 2x space, for example 150 (75x2) in a level 10 barrack

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mewmew

♥♥♥♥ "there were no plans to change this" and "ruled out" are completely different things. One is on a sticky which everyone can read, and one by a representative? Those are completely different things as well. I've read plenty, thanks for assuming that I don't read. Clearly you don't get what everyone else in this cancer topic has already reiterated from what's already been posted a thousand times before.

And if we're talking about maximizing boost, then it's up to YOU to make sure there are troops in your barracks before you raid, so that there are enough things in there to continue training. If you're saying that your barracks are standing idle, that means you clearly didn't leave enough troops queued in your barracks. Maybe you saw that your camps were full and went to go raid and forgot to train more, I don't know? That's completely your fault.

We're just telling you the reasons why this won't be implemented, the fact that it's clearly ruled out for such reasons, and how you're comparing it to other things you claim were ruled out but weren't.

You're wrong on every single level of every reason you're giving to have this added. Again, stop being lazy. It's your fault you don't know how to keep your barracks full, not SC's.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ironagedave

We said the name change wouldn't happen but it did... ok a copmprimise of one time only.

but more importantly zapping immunity we said would never happen ... but hey look at the latest update.

The OP has actually thought about this one. To boost you use gems you are unlikely to abuse something if you have to pay with gems. The fact that you can run out of production of troops if your searching for the right base takes a long enough time - devalues the use of the boost baracks, alternatively increasing the troop que capacity to 120 each would be another viable alternative and may be less complex to introduce to the game and would equate to 2 extra stored armies worth.

---

Not based on laziness read posts....