sick burn :cool:
Printable View
I haven't made this but regardless I`ll leave it here. Apparently on wday, OH gemmed 10 hero levels, and CW gemmed 27 hero levels. Will some1 add the initial values from matching spreadsheet so we can see CW side as well? :cool:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...uUQ/edit#gid=0
Unless you show a spreadsheet you have no evidence for this claim. EVERY source I have looked at (from gadihh or Jake or Keav or asking acurazine) and every spreadsheet I have seen has shown OH's COMBINED royal levels increased by about 10 over a week before the matchup and war day. CW's hero levels, by comparison, rose 27.
great show to both clans, really fun to watch.
Congrats on the win CW, looking forward to a rematch in the near future.
First off all let me say that if the clans did not agree on a no-gemming policy before the war then noone is in the wrong for gemming.
There is no loser here except Clashheads who apparently think it is just great to make up fake spreadsheets and try to accuse the clan who actually did'nt gem of gemming.
You might not be lacking when it comes to attacking skills Clashheads but you sure are lacking in moral fiber.
why does there need to be an agreement in place for clans not to gem hero levels? If you a truly a fair play clan then you should play fair shouldn't you? Is it fair to break into your piggy bank on prep day and raise your heros a few extra levels ? Most people would tend to agree this is not seen as fair play. Most likely it had a minimal affect on the outcome of the war but it does tarnish ones reputation a bit.