More benefit for clanleaders.

Hi there everyone :)

My idea is to make it worth to be a clanleader, so here we go....

As a clanleader, one should receive more loot than the rest of the clan members. Historically that would be correct, as the leader always got the most. But the main reason for giving clanleaders more loot is because they do a lot more than the rest of the members. The clanleader usually has to donate more than others, often because it is a good thing to be a good example to follow, but also because "lazy" members doesn't donate or won't donate (egoistic).
Also, the leader function takes a lot of our time, such as recruiting, learning new members how things work etc etc.
There are more reasons, but these are the main reasons for now.

So my suggestion would be: The clanleader should receive 15-25% of the loot in any clan war, and the rest of the loot should be divided among the rest of the members. If any member in a clanwar doesnt attack, they get zero loot. If clanleader doesn't participate in war, he will not receive any loot either.

This would encourage clanleaders in the long run to build good clans, and to participate a lot in wars. It will also encourage new people to try to become a good clanleader for larger clans.

There ya have it.

Have a nice day.

Ragnar

arrrrr. Me hearties....Leaders should get 90% and those scurvy dogs can fight over the rest.


No. Just not needed. It will simply create divisions and other undesirable things.

No man it will make the game just for leaders
and the leader must be equal with the members its a game not a government
and it could be abusable

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 0jij0

No man it will make the game just for leaders
and the leader must be equal with the members its a game not a government
and it could be abusable

---

Are you a leader?
Why must the leader be equal with it members ? The leaders anywhere are never equal to the member....
And why could it be abusable? Isn't members that pray on a clan without f.ex donating themselves an abuse ?

No. Just . . . no. It is already worth it to be the clan leader. Getting paid to be the leader will just make more clans with lousy leaders because they just want the stuff, not to lead.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by iceageg

No. Just . . . no. It is already worth it to be the clan leader. Getting paid to be the leader will just make more clans with lousy leaders because they just want the stuff, not to lead.

---

Well in that case the clan wont last very long exactly as it is today

No, I'm a leader of a clan, and I don't really do that much. There's nothing too deserving of more loot. This thread just sounds like you are impatient and just want more loot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Flgatorboy

No, I'm a leader of a clan, and I don't really do that much. There's nothing too deserving of more loot. This thread just sounds like you are impatient and just want more loot

---

Not impatient at all, just out for justice for I do a lot as clanleader, and a fair deal would be as I suggest....I do more than everyone else in my clan to make it grow and to get the people to stay, so I spend a lot of resources on it that I could have used on building instead. I could of course quit as clanleader and just become one of those that go from clan to clan and just suck out whatever I can get, but thats not quite me....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OzAudi

arrrrr. Me hearties....Leaders should get 90% and those scurvy dogs can fight over the rest.


No. Just not needed. It will simply create divisions and other undesirable things.

---

What do you mean? Create divisions?
And what are other undesirable things?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Norsk

What do you mean? Create divisions?
And what are other undesirable things?

---

They are obvious. Your inability to see them is no reason to deny they exist.

Here are a few...
Inevitably people will start demanding a greater percentage for co then elder. Even more people will want undeserved promotion.

It gives people even incentive to leave viable but not totally stable clans and con other members to follow just to start their own clan for loot.

I will let you think about more. They are plenty.

No this will make recruiting a whole lot harder.

I'm not sure about this one. I think it will be a no-go though. People could just switch the role as the leader for the loot.:unsure:

but even though donation pose some problems we've already solve it via systematic donation, also dont put all the burden on your shoulders its a coop game in a way. tnx

Yes! Woohoo!

:smirk:

As stated, as much as I love the idea, recruiting would be harder and clans would fall apart

There is no reason for this to be implemented. Also your percentage is way off because each member can get different amount of loot due to their level and th base they choose.

Alo it makes it to easy for someone to funnel resources.... imagine I'm the leader of a clan. Let's say I'm mid th9, having maxed out th8. Now let's say I have a second account, or a mini-me if you like. Let's say mini-me is th5. I could run the clan as my main account then in the last hour of war promote mini-me to leader.... then you have a th5 receive 25% of the total loot for a 50 person war... let's think about this with some Maths. ..

Let's say we average at th8. That's about 300-400k per a equal attack. Let's times that by 50. That is 20 million. Now multiply this by 0.25 that gives us 5 million to a th5. Now let's see correct m if I'm wrong but the total resources of a th5 are less than this... not to mention the cc loot storage size.


Tl; dr -- people funnel loot to lower accounts. A big no no.

So there you have it. NOT AS GOOD IDEA

Em.. no. Anyone will just make a clan and bring crappyplayers in it and just do a war or something if thats what your saying and he'll get more loot. No, just no.

As a leader of a really good clan I do NOT want this idea. We dont win the war because of me, the clan works together for that win. Frankly some times my attacks dont help much as attacking a TH10 with infernos is still a bit risky for me to 2 star at times.

I often feel bad for the TH7s in the clan as they are often spending more in army cost than they win back in a win. To take a higher percentage would be a huge slap in their face for their efforts in the win.

While not always true leaders are often among the higher levels in their clan and as such usually attack the higher bases in war. So they are already getting a higher percentage. Now you want even more???

As for leaders donating more - thats why the clan perks helpfully give a % of your donation back if you have reached certain clan levels. Super Cell has already generously covered this for ANYONE that donates.

Nothing needs to change here.

I would suggest a leader and co-leaders should receive less loot than ordinary members and also have to pay weekly sum of in-game resources as a clan maintenance fee. Incentive to create another clan should be reduced, not increased. ;-)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StanHC

have to pay weekly sum of in-game resources as a clan maintenance fee

---

Most leaders/co-leaders are the ones donating the cc troops, because they are typically the higher-level more-invested players in the clan ... so they are already being taxed.

For the OP ... if you think the leader deserves more, require more CC donations (both war and regular) from your "lesser" members, and do less donating yourself. Spending less = more reward for you.

And being rewarded by loot bonus from the higher bases. So, I really don't see the point of changing anything for them. :-)

I am currently an elder on our clan, where i also help in terms of donating in CC troops.. it all boils down on how your clan do your own teamwork.. it's not just the leaders/co leaders job to do those things. Cooperate with each other, you'll get better result that way

Man thats will make all people want to be leaders it will create problems and in so many clans the leader work the same work as coleaders or maybe less job
and it will des equal the players for example who is betting who will finish the game, being a leader will make one stronger than one
no no ur idea aren't good man

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Flgatorboy

No, I'm a leader of a clan, and I don't really do that much.

---

I surely am glad not to be in your clan! I think you summed it up right there. Can you please share your name, city, and state so that I never hire you to work for me. You must have a government job in real life.

Some kind of benefits would be nice, even if it was credit and 50% refunds for clan castle donations. Being the highest member in my clan, I populate the clan castles myself and it helps a lot. It would be nice if SuperCell gave a bit more back to those populating clan castles.

I might know u. R u in fallen victors :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by iceageg

Getting paid to be the leader will just make more clans with lousy leaders...

---

Flgatorboy says he already doesn't do much. I'm not necessarily an advocate of special loot for leaders, but more benefits for the things leaders do, such as castle troop donations, etc. Nice refunds on castle troops donations would be great.

You would like additional benefits for being leader?

How about good strong clan!

I am a co-leader who donates on average a dozen dragons and 20 wizards on most war maps. I also average about 5k in regular donations per season. There are several others in our clan like me plus a generous leader. He started the clan donating EVERYTHING himself. As time passed he found like minded players who wished to help him grow a strong clan. If you are not willing or able to do the same don't start a clan. Simple! It should be tough to get a new clan off the ground because selfish players should not be leaders.

You have to pay the cost to be the boss.

It would be too complicated for SC to put in, but it would be nice if players automatically paid back the e/de cost of the troops donated to their castles for war, out of their war share.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by toogs

It would be too complicated for SC to put in, but it would be nice if players automatically paid back the e/de cost of the troops donated to their castles for war, out of their war share.

---

Off the topic of should or shouldn't, it certainly wouldn't be too complicated to put it in. But why do all that -- pay for troops put in your war castle, etc... Why not just provide a hefty refund for donated castle troops - 50% or so.

this would too many 10 person clans and its really not needed

everyone would start thier own clan then

No from me, in our clan the 'leader' isn't the real leader due to a few shuffles when our real, original, leader had to leave for a bit to help out a family clan. The person it now shows as leader (oldest player) isn't even very active. Would need a way to vote for leader before this could work and that's even more troublesome in terms of gameplay dynamics implications. Plus why? No reason leader would be working especially hard compared to other key players in an established clan imo.

i think this shouldnt be cuz if someone attacks better than leader it would be unfair for him.:thumbsdown::thumbsdown::thumbsdown::thumbsdow n: