Printable View
For clans that like war, waiting 24 hours may be totally un-necessary. I propose adding a flag for each fighter in war (seen within the clan) that says 'I'm ready'... so that a leader can gauge who is ready for war. Then, based upon those, the leader / co-leader can set an official WE'RE READY flag for the team. If both team's raise the WE'RE READY flag, war starts immediately.
Clans could match one another and do one war per day - too exploitable.
Your reply makes no sense. I'm just suggesting an option where if both teams who have already been match raise a flag that says they are ready for war, the war would start immediately. Yes, it would be possible for almost a war per day... but if you want to populate with castle troops, etc... it will likely just lower some of the prep times to a few hours rather than 24 hours. As for 'clans could match one another'..... that doesn't make sense.
Friend A could make a clan with 10 members level 10. Friend B could do the same. They start search at the same time. They match each other.
Both immediately raise the We're Ready Flag and then Friend A used an attack and gets three stars. No attacks happen for the rest of the war.
Friend A's clan wins! Then they repeat and get 200 wins in 205 days.
There's no guarantee they would be an exact match unless their members stayed at the same level as they grew. The likelihood of that happening is very small. I mean, really, 20 members in two separate clans maintaining the same level as people come and go, go to school, go to work, get busy on other stuff -- not going to happen. Goodness... if that were the case, you could do almost the same thing now... just double the days. Besides, how many people in Friend B's clan would want to stick around for 200 losing battles.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopsU
Your argument doesn't really work. Surely, as with many features, you could possibly exploit them a bit, but in this case, not very much. It wouldn't be any fun.
People do this - there are one-man clans that match themselves. And the peoe in Friend B's clan would be only Friend B's ten accounts. These people don't do it for fun, they do it for fame.
100 posts!
Ok. But that doesn't make it a less valuable idea for those who aren't wasting their time for such fleeting fame. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopsU
It seems that you like to make several new threads, and when others comment on why these features wouldnt work, you get defensive and come up with all the reasons your clan thinks it would. The 24 hour prep time is good how it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by hayedidnm
Yanks.... it seems you like to be negative in every thread. I made a new thread for each idea. This facilitates comments better. If you don't like the idea fine. I do. I'll put in my two cents for my ideas and dispute arguments against it -- that is why they call this a forum. I'm not being defensive... I'm just defending my idea. If I didn't think my idea had merit to begin with, I would not have posted it.Quote:
Originally Posted by yanks8981
This thread as a case in point, HoopsU points out a possible exploit. I simply pointed out that if the same thing already happens, then it's not much of a new exploit... it just means that wars can happen more frequently. Yes, some may exploit the idea [in this case, an exploit really wouldn't cause damage], other will use the feature and benefit from it. For many clans, their bases are ready and they just want to do war. Forums are good for debating in growing an idea. In one of my ideas, a user posted an alternative suggestion and my response was that I though his suggestion was a good solution to the problem. Seems to me, that you are the one being negative.
While new ideas are appreciated, this has been suggested before and the threads should be searchable.Quote:
Originally Posted by hayedidnm