Civil Wars

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

June 18th, 2015
soccercrazy1

As stated before, the original post is vague

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flgatorboy

WAIT! Did I read the right? And.. Senior memeber??? I dont get it

As he wrote it I would say no, but with regulation on it it would be ok. Very little war loot. Auto balancing. A cool down time on it. No clan experience. I'm sure you get my gist. A few lost phoenix feeder clans did something similar. By swapping players between their clans they were able to rig it so that the got matched together and the had a war for fun.

PS please don't be condescending. It's my opinion.:straightface:
June 19th, 2015
Conqueror777

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flgatorboy

WAIT! Did I read the right? And.. Senior memeber??? I dont get it

Oh wait... Flgatorboy thinks he's the cat's meow. Flgatorboy, congratulations! --- you win the Darwin award for stupidity. If everyone thought as you did, there would be no new ideas... no trying new ideas.... no improving previous thoughts.... no lights, no electricity... that might be good though, at least you wouldn't be able to login and post your prideful arrogance whenever you see fit.
June 19th, 2015
gamul1
I would love to see that when a Clan is not in a war, the war base is still active with all clan members war bases shown (whether opted in or not). And, following your idea, any member could attack any other members war base. Absolutely ZERO loot would be given to the person attacking and the army used would still cost them normal cost.

But the benefits of this would be:
- Allow clan members to more easily provide feedback about other members war bases
- Allow clan members to practice on harder war bases
- Allow a new clan member ot demonstrate their ability to attack an appropriate base so the clan leadership could decide if you could be in the next war or not
Lots of benefits in doing the above.
June 19th, 2015
Conqueror777
Quote:
Originally Posted by gamul1

I would love to see that when a Clan is not in a war, the war base is still active with all clan members war bases shown (whether opted in or not). And, following your idea, any member could attack any other members war base. Absolutely ZERO loot would be given to the person attacking and the army used would still cost them normal cost.

But the benefits of this would be:

Allow clan members to more easily provide feedback about other members war bases
Allow clan members to practice on harder war bases
Allow a new clan member ot demonstrate their ability to attack an appropriate base so the clan leadership could decide if you could be in the next war or not

Lots of benefits in doing the above.
I concur.... in the cases where people might replicate bases to figure out how to defeat them, it would simply create a motivation for newer, original, and stronger base designs.
June 19th, 2015
AxionXD

Quote:

Originally Posted by hayedidnm

Then it would be just as easy to allow wars... and allow less clan XP for civil wars. It could still be a lot of fun. There surely are a bunch of naysayers in this forum who bash an idea without giving it a chance or thinking through improvements of the idea. You can just as easily farm XP with non-civil wars. I don't think this has been a problem.

Improve upon it by removing War XP. Shouldn't get XP for practice war anyways.

I'd be OK with "Civil War" type rounds if no loot or xp is exchanged.
June 19th, 2015
Conqueror777

Quote:

Originally Posted by AxionXD

I'd be OK with "Civil War" type rounds if no loot or xp is exchanged.

Okay... but if no loot, then let them be practice troops that you still have after the battle.... so a 'just for fun a practice battle'.
June 19th, 2015
CaptainSport

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conqueror777

Okay... but if no loot, then let them be practice troops that you still have after the battle.... so a 'just for fun a practice battle'.

You can have your friend change his/her base to a base you want to revenge, and attack it until you get three stars. Then, you can get three stars in the real battle.
June 20th, 2015
Conqueror777

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainSport

You can have your friend change his/her base to a base you want to revenge, and attack it until you get three stars. Then, you can get three stars in the real battle.

If you are willing to go through that effort, you deserve the 3 star revenge. Also, unless you join their clan first, you won't know where the Teslas, bombs, etc.. are... So, if you are willing to do ALL of that... you super deserve 3 stars!
June 20th, 2015
CaptainSport

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conqueror777

If you are willing to go through that effort, you deserve the 3 star revenge. Also, unless you join their clan first, you won't know where the Teslas, bombs, etc.. are... So, if you are willing to do ALL of that... you super deserve 3 stars!

So your basically saying people that go through all the trouble to use fluffy bunnies deserve three stars in war?
June 20th, 2015
Conqueror777

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainSport

So your basically saying people that go through all the trouble to use fluffy bunnies deserve three stars in war?

If you like fluffy bunnies, go for it - stop making dumb comments. The comment was referencing a revenge attack. The feature could easily be disabled during war attacks.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page