Printable View
Very simple average war destruction per ATTACK, is
f that is tied then whoever used less attacks, if that is tied most 3 star attacks, if by some miracle all of those r tied then quickest ATTACK time, and if u r the one in a million that all of those tied than, fewest failed attacks. That's all I got hope u like it. It is just ties r boring and don't really show which clan is better but more often than not who is more active and/or lucky so here is my solution thx😆
There is no metric that resolves ties that does not depend on the attack type used or a clan’s target selection strategy or impact on a clan’s choice or when they war or who they take to war.
To introduce a tie breaker will alter game-play during wars.
Besides, this suggestion will not resolve those wars where each clan achieves maximum stars.
A tie/draw is just that, live with it.
Yes, to introduce a tie breaker will alter game-play during wars. If the alteration is OK, then the tie breaking is good.Quote:
Originally Posted by OzAudi
The suggested tie breaker here is one that would put pressure on lower players to not use spare attacks experimentally. That would not be good.
Average destruction including redundant attacks, similarly would unfairly penalise.
Positive tie breaking, encouraging prompt play, might include:
* First to attack.
* First side to complete one attack per player, or side with more attacking players, or First side to have their last attacking player make their first attack.
* First to achieve the tied score.
Nah...
No need to find a solution to a non-existing problem.
Draw is not a problem. It's your clan war strategy that is.
We have pretty good strategy, and when followed we get 43/45 stars in 15v15. Problem is, so does the opposition. Good clans, good strategy, good discipline, it leads to high end results, and high probability of draw. We have had draws 3 times in the last 20 wars. It's not a game breaking problem, but a tie breaker would be preferable. A tie feels nowhere near half as good as a win.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kennnnnnn
Then keep doing what you're doing on offense as it's working, but make your TH8/9s all build anti 3-star bases. If you can hold your top few bases to 2 stars, you'll edge out those clans every time.Quote:
Originally Posted by George1971
I would like to see a solution to draws - ties stink. But I dont know that anything in the current measurement system would help the problem.
I would not like to see fewest attacks used or new stars per attacks - a clan that has a very successful first round of attacks would be discouraged from being able to attack for loot on the lowest bases who cant star anyone left. I like to let my lowest bases attack for loot and experience when they have no shot to get stars. If a tie breaker went in that brought in the above factors I would be discouraging ppl not to participate any more - and thats not right.
I would like to see something like this:
- 15 minutes is added to the war.
- Up to 3 attacks could be done again per side - anyone in the clan could attack
- But no one could pick just any base - Super Cell would decide each persons best match up and you had to attack that base or not at all. No picking and choosing.
- But the match would have to be within TH levels (TH9 vs TH9, or TH10 vs TH10. This means if your clan had 1 TH10 and the other clan only had a TH9 as max, your TH10 would not be eligible for over time.
- Winner could be based purely on over time and then could be number of stars and % destruction.
This would bring some mystery and excitement and some risk. The people that prepare have to risk what they get/ For example, If one TH0 had multi infernos and another had single shot infernos, you might like to bring a different army but you would not know until over time starts.
Anyway - wish they would do something about ties.
This is smart but failed attacks would be tied if the others are tied if it wasn't then something earlier up the line was already uneven.
also they should just do Rock Paper Scissors
Are ties really that frequent? At least for good warring clans? Our clan has a 95-24-1 record, and my clan before that was 28-6 with no ties. One draw in 154 wars. We range from a couple of TH10s, with our main bulk being TH9s and TH7s, with a handful of TH8s in there as well as some scattered TH5/6s. It seems as so long as you organize your clan well and everyone knows what they should hit to maximize the stars for the clan, you should win those wars. Before we made the turning point where I had to clean house and get our TH9s on board with using 3-starring armies instead of forcing dragon attacks as if they were still TH7/8s, we would lose more and more frequently b/c we couldn't take care of business up top. Since then, we're 19-0 and while we've had a couple 1-2 star close call wins, even if those resulted in ties they'd be completely earned/deserved from both ends.
I just don't see this as a problem, except maybe for all TH10 clans.
Proposed tie breakers that alter the length of wars, or the timing of attacks (whether at the end or beginning of battle day), unfairly penalize international clans and those clans that use timing of attacks as part of battle day strategies.
My clan happens to be both and we certainly don’t wish feel forced into attacking to any schedule. It’s difficult enough now, with people often making a small personal sacrifice to donate or battle when they would prefer to be asleep.