5v5 Clanwars

Do you know this feeling? You are in a clan with around 5 active members and hate it when you lose clanwars while some of your clanmates didn't even bother attacking. Or you are just in a clan with less than 10 members. That's why we need 5v5 Clanwars. I know this thread isn't really detailed but please SC, considder this.

Thanks for reading and have a nice day.

edit:

Some people didn't like the idea because of some reasons. Underneath I will explain some stuff.

Q: Wouldn't there be so much draws in 5v5 Clanwars? Because we don't like draws.
A: Yes, but I am sure SC could implement either draw breaking; percentage, TH's attacking lower or higher TH's, amount of troops used, everything is possible. Or they could add ''sudden deaths''.

Q: Wouldn't there be much less teamwork in 5v5 Clanwars?
A: No, by ''teamwork'' you probably mean donating troops to clanwars bases and planning who is going to attack who and what troops they would have to use. With less players donating to all bases would be cheaper, so more people would do it. Planning will be more important because there are less bases, so tactic is a major factor in winning or losing. With tactic I also mean planning what troops you are going to use and where you would drop them.

This ENTIRE thread is confusing to me, adding more detail I think would be very helpful thank you, :thumbsup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EpicChris

This ENTIRE thread is confusing to me, adding more detail I think would be very helpful thank you, :thumbsup:

---

basicly just 5v5 clanwars (:

Didn't they used to have that?

Not that I know, but if they had that I would love to have it back.

Hope you like ties

No one likes ties

I like this. This should be added, because sometimes only 5 of your clan members are active, and sometimes you can't get members. This should be reason enough to make 5v5 Clan wars, and if you need more convincing, there are many new players, and most clans require a high standard to join.

Would end in way too many draws.

I think SC likes to avoid ties as much as possible as it causes a lot of frustration.

Also, SC made wars as a teamwork thing. The less the players, the more it relies on one or two individual people. Having 10 as a minimum is there for a reason.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SlackerKing

Would end in way too many draws.

---

I edited the post, I gave some ideas how they could fix draws. Since nobody likes them they could just remove draws.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BakedAir

I edited the post, I gave some ideas how they could fix draws. Since nobody likes them they could just remove draws.

---

the whole tie breaker thing is a can of worms that should be left in the ground because the bigger clans with more players would also be miffed - it eliminates ties completey say 100 stars met 100 stars but 'clan b' beat 'clan a' because they got 1% more average destruction - if you were in Clan A would you be miffed...

I like the idea of clan wars 5 v 5 but I think a better alternative is that you have 1 attack only - but this might be hard to script.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BakedAir

Do you know this feeling? You are in a clan with around 5 active members and hate it when you lose clanwars while some of your clanmates didn't even bother attacking. That's why we need 5v5 Clanwars. I know this thread isn't really detailed but please SC, considder this.

Thanks for reading and have a nice day.

edit:
Indeed there would be much draws, but isn't there something named Supercell? So, my idea is: First, the clan with the most stars win, then they look at percentage and if that isn't possible they could look at TH levels (did one clan attack much lower TH's? They lose). I don't think that should be a big deal to implement.

---

YEP 10/10 please do this

I like everything but the tiebreaker idea. My clan is quite active, but I know there are some clans like yours.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BakedAir

Do you know this feeling? You are in a clan with around 5 active members and hate it when you lose clanwars while some of your clanmates didn't even bother attacking. That's why we need 5v5 Clanwars. I know this thread isn't really detailed but please SC, considder this.

Thanks for reading and have a nice day.

edit:
Indeed there would be much draws, but isn't there something named Supercell? So, my idea is: First, the clan with the most stars win, then they look at percentage and if that isn't possible they could look at TH levels (did one clan attack much lower TH's? They lose). I don't think that should be a big deal to implement.

---

I don't like the tiebreaker because if you get a group of rushed th10s against a group of max th5s the th5s would win just because they didn't help sc(by gemming)

this is deffinatly a bad idea for a couple of reasons.

-Teamwork
Clan wars are meant to have alot of teamwork involved, when you make wars 5v5, you lose a big part of that teamwork aspect because you have less players

-Ties
Because you have less players, you are more likely to end up with a total score of 15-15, ending in a tie..
this would frustrate many players and it would be really hard to work around that for a couple reasons

(1 the coding would be really hard to do
(2 it would be unfair for larger clans

ultimately this is a bad idea and i dont think SC will actually do this, thankfully

Plz add this

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brune67

this is deffinatly a bad idea for a couple of reasons.

-Teamwork
Clan wars are meant to have alot of teamwork involved, when you make wars 5v5, you lose a big part of that teamwork aspect because you have less players

-Ties
Because you have less players, you are more likely to end up with a total score of 15-15, ending in a tie..
this would frustrate many players and it would be really hard to work around that for a couple reasons

(1 the coding would be really hard to do
(2 it would be unfair for larger clans

ultimately this is a bad idea and i dont think SC will actually do this, thankfully

---

Whilst this is true it would still provide some incentive to help a new clan grow. I agree tie breaker would be a bad move but I think a single attack - almost like a sudden death penalty shoot out clan war would be good. As it is only one attack, the xps would be low and therefore encourage you to grow your clan in order to climb the clan levels. A level 1 clan these days has very little x appeal lets be honest.

There's a youtuber called Chief Pat who has a video of a developer build 5v5 clan war. Different rules. But the tiebreaker is an issue.

Could have a sudden death where the number one players face off again to seal the deal. But other than that it wouldn't work out well