No loss of trophies for losing attacks

Sick of those massively op plays camping with low trophies so they can raid beginner camps with one strong toon without much fear of a successful revenge? Players who attack strong bases with just one troop so they can lose trophies & prevent from levelling up?

simple fix, you only lose trophies if you are attacked & lose. If you attack players you automatically get 5 trophies, more if you win. No more one spell or one toon attacks.

this could also limit those players who just spell DE as each time they do it they will be levelling towards higher tiers as it will no longer count as a loss for them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FairlyBad

Sick of those massively op plays camping with low trophies so they can raid beginner camps with one strong toon without much fear of a successful revenge? Players who attack strong bases with just one troop so they can lose trophies & prevent from levelling up?

simple fix, you only lose trophies if you are attacked & lose. If you attack players you automatically get 5 trophies, more if you win. No more one spell or one toon attacks.

this could also limit those players who just spell DE as each time they do it they will be levelling towards higher tiers as it will no longer count as a loss for them.

---

We have a loot penalty and matchmaking system that makes massively overpowered players picking on new players impossible, as far as giving trophies even on failed attacks that is just insane every player In the game could instantly push as high as they want and then you say that free trophies will encourage people to stop zapping (which isn't a problem anyway). Did you actually read this post back to yourself before making the thread?

Yes I did read it, & if I was rude & ignorant like you I'd ask if you actually give any thought before you respond but since I'm not I won't.

when I started I was often raided by players with tier 8 town halls & above. when I was trying to attack tier 8 & above towns were often selected as being a good match so the matchmaking system you say works so well doesn't actually exist

as to everyone pushing up, what does it matter? If they push up & are weak then they will be attacked & lose trophies so they eventually settle at the level that suits their town's defensive ability. Allowing players to artificially drop themselves into lower (trophy) match made games actually unbalances the game more. It's better to have people pushed down to where they are best suited than to have players artificially keeping themselves in lower tiered matches.

Trophies are meant to be rewards. Who would give you a trophy if you didnt win anything?

Who takes trophies away when you lose your next match?

this is giving people base trophies for attacking, then more as they win more stars. Taking trophies off people for attacking & losing unbalances the game & provides an incentive for people to do simple attacks in order to lose trophies & drop tiers while they build. Conversely they should be rewarding people for attacking by giving them trophies for attempting to win. At the moment they are giving a reward to those players who want to camp at safer, lower tiers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FairlyBad

Yes I did read it, & if I was rude & ignorant like you I'd ask if you actually give any thought before you respond but since I'm not I won't.

when I started I was often raided by players with tier 8 town halls & above. when I was trying to attack tier 8 & above towns were often selected as being a good match so the matchmaking system you say works so well doesn't actually exist

as to everyone pushing up, what does it matter? If they push up & are weak then they will be attacked & lose trophies so they eventually settle at the level that suits their town's defensive ability. Allowing players to artificially drop themselves into lower (trophy) match made games actually unbalances the game more. It's better to have people pushed down to where they are best suited than to have players artificially keeping themselves in lower tiered matches.

---

MM works fine now. They made it so you can only attack and be attacked by your th, a lvl higher, lvl lower, and extremely rarely 2 lvls higher and 2 lvls lower

if that is implemented, it would be very nice. i can push to champs as a th1 :smirk::smirk::smirk:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FairlyBad

Yes I did read it, & if I was rude & ignorant like you I'd ask if you actually give any thought before you respond but since I'm not I won't.

when I started I was often raided by players with tier 8 town halls & above. when I was trying to attack tier 8 & above towns were often selected as being a good match so the matchmaking system you say works so well doesn't actually exist

as to everyone pushing up, what does it matter? If they push up & are weak then they will be attacked & lose trophies so they eventually settle at the level that suits their town's defensive ability. Allowing players to artificially drop themselves into lower (trophy) match made games actually unbalances the game more. It's better to have people pushed down to where they are best suited than to have players artificially keeping themselves in lower tiered matches.

---

If you just keep getting trophies and loss none the whole league system would become waste.
And if trophy pushing becomes easy there would be no point in doing trophy push

Terrible idea. With the update you are matched close to your level. This would encourage members to barch and lightning strike. Bad idea

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fanboy59

We have a loot penalty and matchmaking system that makes massively overpowered players picking on new players impossible, as far as giving trophies even on failed attacks that is just insane every player In the game could instantly push as high as they want and then you say that free trophies will encourage people to stop zapping (which isn't a problem anyway). Did you actually read this post back to yourself before making the thread?

---

lol.. funny.. right impossible. :smirk:

I can still go down to lower leagues and troll the hell out of lower level Town Hall players. The Matching Making system does not block that, and the loot penalty just makes it unprofitable. Since practically all the players want things profitable, they rarely ever attack anything two Town Hall levels lower than them or greater, with the loot penalty system in place.

Not to say the addition of the loot penalty system wasn't an improvement, it solved most of the issues from two levels of difference and greater, but it still couldn't totally solve the problem. You still have the issue of annoyed and put off players constantly being raided by people one Town Hall level higher than them (sometimes 2 levels higher if they are really looted with loot), with a one level difference still being significant enough increase in strength to put thier village defence to shame on almost a daily basis.

And no, you just can't just simply tighten up the loot penalty system to fix that one level difference issue as well. Unless Supercell staff collectively wants a forced early retirement as well as dead game on thier hands.

You're going to keep getting people like OP coming up with simple knee-jerk reaction based ideas to fix the thing because... well, most people should already know that a person doesn't exactly think too clearly when ticked off. And people join here because most are likely tired of some annoying aspect of the game and want it fixed. Can you blame them? Wasn't that also the reason why most of you people are here? With them being newbies, they of course don't know all the details of why most 'obvious' ideas don't work.

Just say 'sorry, that idea does work because <explained reason>' and be done with it. No need to say it's 'stupid' or the OP is stupid, or whatever. If people here actually want to try to come up with an idea Supercell can use to solve an issue, then they shouldn't act like teenagers and... wait.. this is an ages 13 and up game. Woops. :smirk: So much for that idea. Oh darn, I'm stupid now because of a failed idea. :rolleyes: ... get over it, learn from your own and other's mistakes, and move on.