Can you add a feature where if you are still doing prep and someone, leaves clan...could you make it to where you can replace them.
Printable View
Can you add a feature where if you are still doing prep and someone, leaves clan...could you make it to where you can replace them.
I think that is a great idea. you should be able to select 3 backup players that would fill in for players that leave or players that decide to opt out of war part way through war prep day. Maybe limit players opting out to 12 ours in. This way you could maximize the amount of players that participate in war.
can... somewhat be... abused.Quote:
Originally Posted by hornets9258
--> add dummy players
--> when prep is about to end, switch dummies to the strong members of the clan
to prevent these kind of players, you make new members wait for a current war to end...
this is hard to do because the opponent match criteria is based on members previously selected to war search..
however, its possible to do if replace the missing spot with another similar village if exists.
technically, is possible but hard to implement.
The best solution to this is to 'grey out' (disable) 'Leave Clan' button when that person is added on an active war. He can only do so after the war is over. This is the best solution for abusing war fight against replacing another stronger player after the search.
That's the worst solution, they would only cause more trouble to the clan if they couldn't leave.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarlfab
The OP solution is an okay one, but only weaker member should be allowed to replace the player that left.
You need to look into situation when if there are no lower level players are available for the replacement. It will cause a lot more headaches for balancing the war since it's already matched accordingly to player levels.Quote:
Originally Posted by NF2335
If this player choose to leave clan during war time, that will be an attitude problem on that player. He shouldn't be allowed to leave clan because he choose to opt-in at first! I'd suggest developers can add a 'player reputation' stats to the village for clan leaders to rate players who did not use attacks during war. Before giving this player reputation demerit points, it must be agreed by at least 5 clan players to make the 'agree' votes and thus, deducting reputation points on that player.
Hi,
not allowing to leave during war would be a bad solution. I frequently leave my clan to visit the clan my kids are playing in in order to check everything is all right there and come back an hour or so later.
But the idea of being able to nominate another (weaker) member as a replacement for a member that left the war is great.
If the clan has no such weaker member they could try to finde one in global. Should be no problem to finde one there.
Another idea might be to be able to transfer unused attacks from gone members to the next weak active cw participant. Should be no problem if there is no next weak participant because it is usually no problem for the clan if the weakest fighter does not attack.
Regards,
Rothaut
Disable leaving clan is only active when you're in a war period. Demerit points are up to the clan leaders to decide if they should deduct from your reputation. They can choose not to deduct your reputation points if you have valid reasons for not attacking in war or leaving clan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rothaut
If a war is matched with another clan, leaving and adding will create more unfairness to the game... coz you've already 'seen' your opponent bases. It can also mean your clan members can leave the war because they think they can't handle those bases and ask for replacement from another player who has the 'right' troops for those bases. Get the point?
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarlfab
Forcing members to stay in a clan when they don't want to would create the following results.
1. Makes his war base an easy 3 star purposely.
2. Donates goblins and wallbreakers to everyone's CC.
3. Clicks attack then ends it immediately after.
4. trash talks and spams in clan chat.
Now tell me, do you REALLY think it'd be a good idea to force people within a clan when they don't want to? In my opinion is YOUR bad leadership by not choosing the right members for war.
Also, about your other idea, that would create a lot of bullying and could be abused. Example:
*Global*
Jim: Hey john, join here, we'll give free pekkas.
*john joins because he's slightly new*
*Jim instantly gives him demerits, and the other members agree, already being setup*
Supercell doesn't even add your loses in your statistic, you really think they'll make a feature where individuals can rate other players? Not a chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarlfab
You ou cant fix war abandoners, its sad and happens to everyone. If you lose because one leaves, your clan is weak bud muliltiple people leave each war, something is seriously wrong with your clans retention rate.
NOT POSSIBLE.
then every clan will search war with th3's, then replace them with th10s in prep day. Bad idea
Thanks for the replies..let me clear this up though I also meant when a person leaves the person you choose to replace them has to be at the same level or lower than the one that left. I think it's a great idea.
Well, everyone else could always 3s their two attacks. You wouldn't even feel that someone left haha
Swapping players would mess up the war matching, would mislead the opposition who looked at the initial line up.
A better solution is to not take new or unreliable players to war.
A new feature that would facilitate this would be if new members of the clan we defaulted to "Opt-out", and they required a leader's intervention to opt in while new.
Other idea's that would help is an internal viewable statistic of how many wars the player has been in with the clan, how many stars they have won for the clan, and total amount of time (not continuous) that the player has been in the clan. These are easy things for the leader to record on a piece of paper, but should be trivial to implement in the game.