A new trap idea for spells! (Imagine the possibilities).

Not sure if this has been shared or not but why not a new trap that is for spells?

It would cover an area with a small proximity like air mines and it will have the ability to render the effects of a certain spell useless in that area.

In order to not break the game, this proximity should be limited to the size of a 3x3 or at most a 5x5 square. This will ensure that mechanics of the game aren't compromised. Also there shouldn't be more than one of these traps made available.

Effects? Imagine the possibilities.

Limits the use of at least one spell in a attack or defense and works for all spells. The spell will still work outside of the trap's proximity so that the full spell isn't wasted. ALSO, it can only work on one spell so if a second spell is placed in the same area, the trap will have no effect on it.

You can strategically place spell trap in places where a spell would typically be used: near inferno to prevent freeze, near mortars to prevent lightning, near wall sections to prevent a jump, near giant bombs to prevent heals, and near crucial places where rages would often be used.

This idea can open up many new dynamics in the game and provide new opportunities for skill based attacking.

Let me know what you think :)

Might need some thorough research into mechanics/specifications but it is a good idea!

I think that if a trap could prevent Inferno Towers from being frozen, it would be a bit Overpowered in my opinion. Inferno Towers are extremely powerful, and often a Freeze Spell is needed for troops to get into the core and destroy it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheScavenger350

I think that if a trap could prevent Inferno Towers from being frozen, it would be a bit Overpowered in my opinion. Inferno Towers are extremely powerful, and often a Freeze Spell is needed for troops to get into the core and destroy it.

---

Which is why measures can be taken to prevent overpowered effects like assigning a limit to the time trap is active, and also the number of spells it has the ability to prevent. So you can drop one freeze and if trap stops that freeze, the next freeze can freeze the inferno tower.

No offense but really, imagine the possibilities you can cook 5 spells at a time if you are a h10! if one of these spells were just wasted you would not only waste 30 000 elixir but also a match! so sorry but down vote! :thumbsdown:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Charbeldegr8

No offense but really, imagine the possibilities you can cook 5 spells at a time if you are a h10! if one of these spells were just wasted you would not only waste 30 000 elixir but also a match! so sorry but down vote! :thumbsdown:

---

Thanks for your input, but I think you misunderstood. It has the potential to waste a spell but does only so in the proximity of the trap. If you drop a rage, the rage is still effective outside the proximity partially. It's just like any other trap, it is meant to "waste" the enemy's troops just like a giant bomb would waste a group of wizards :)

I think we all know what this "trap" is really for....:facepalm:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LukeNQ

I think we all know what this "trap" is really for....:facepalm:

---

Lol, are you implying that I'm complaining about de zapping? Because I could care less about my de being zapped.

No, I'm legitimately posting this with the possibility of it being a real thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alejcho

Might need some thorough research into mechanics/specifications but it is a good idea!

---

Yeah, I'm not saying this is finalized, haha. Just an idea, thanks!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LukeNQ

I think we all know what this "trap" is really for....:facepalm:

---

That damn old lighting the de storage