Originally Posted by
rwelshjr
No, I gotta say you were going to be 'tetchy' anyhow. Although you claim you came here not to complain, not to change things, you have done both starting with your original post. And you have been spoiling for a fight ever since, that's why you have treated people pointing out a few facts as personal attacks.
Despite your claim that you were seeking discussion that is not true either. You did not want discussion at al, you wanted sympathy and agreement with your complaints, you wanted to hear that everyone was going to get behind you and the changes you were trying to push. You rejected discussion as soon as you got mad at hearing points and facts that did not go along with what you wanted to hear. Instead you considered anything other than what you wanted to hear as personal attacks. That is not the actions of a person seeking discussion so lets not kid here.
Guys did explain why your topic and suggestion are bad ones, they did not just rag on it, they gave you the facts. You have responded as a person that sees having those facts presented as personal attacks.
So yeah, you are tetchy. You were going to be tecthy if you got any response other than someone in authority saying 'we are on it'.
Oh for gosh sakes, get off your high horse please. You can post, you are just hoping someone says otherwise so you can fight about it. As you post, try to come up with new ideas that would improve the game. To simply rehash old ones and further beat an already long dead horse is not doing that. No it is not your fault that this got discussed into the ground before you. But you should still have more respect for that point than you do and certainly should not have that chip on your shoulder. The fact that you approached this with such a chip on your shoulder gives the appearance you already knew you were doing the wrong thing and were just daring anyone to say so.
The fact is that the people in authority have already said it is not a problem (and being the ones that decide what the game is going to be and then make it that way their opinion is the one that counts) and not something they plan to make changes over. That is the reason why folks see further whining and further pushing of things that they already said they were not going to do as just spamming old ideas. And spamming just takes up space that could go to newer ideas that might actually help solve something that is a problem. (Which zapping is not, sorry)