The reel spell is basically the same as a heal and a rage piled ontop of each other but in 1 spell
It takes 2 space and costs the same as a rage and a heal
When you level up your rage spell you reel spell will have the rage part levelling u
Printable View
The reel spell is basically the same as a heal and a rage piled ontop of each other but in 1 spell
It takes 2 space and costs the same as a rage and a heal
When you level up your rage spell you reel spell will have the rage part levelling u
Forgot a bit
It is a heal spell and a rage spell combined together with all of the affects from both of them
Its the same as a heal and a rage, takes up the same space as a heal and a rage, and even costs the same... I must ask, why not just use a heal and a rage?
ahahaha. Good point. It will just be an unnecessary additionQuote:
Originally Posted by Slaskio
It would be easier to use and both exaclty togetherQuote:
Originally Posted by Topherccino
That would make the two spells worse as you have no control over overlap. Rage your troops right out of you heal, then whats the point?Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaoslorder
Yeah, if you are raging and healing in the exact same place you probably are doing something wrong. Especially when you get to inferno towers which negates any healing.
this does not help players raid more effectively; it should remain two separate spells.
lol, reminds me of the Barcher:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ByTDE6sCUAAb904.jpg
Well for that why not just use archers?Quote:
Originally Posted by badfish1979