Printable View
- Special bonus for big wars(stars difference less than 5)
- More freedom in the clan(PM, transfering the loots, loaning a builder...)
- Heroes can be used, even if they are not 100% healthy because of very long regeneration time
- Penalty for attacker in the wars if he attacking the lower town hall
- Hero should be active during upgrade in the wars(buildings are active during the upgrade)
What do u think guys do you agree/disagree?
1) You get a bonus for winning a war by less than 5 stars. It happens to be the same as if you win by 100, but its still a bonus. I say no.Quote:
Originally Posted by IlDiavolo
2) I am not sure what SC says about PMs, but loaning a builder and transferring loot have been ruled out I believe. I know the loot part has. It would be abused and has had a ton of threads suggesting it if you had searched before posting. Players would have alternate accounts looting at low levels where loot is easy to obtain and funneling it to their more difficult to loot TH10s. If you put a cap on it, they would just make more alternate accounts.
3) What would be the point of having regeneration time if you can use them anyways? Are you saying that if they are 50% regenerated, than they would have 50% health? If so, I am not sure of how I feel about that. I am leaning towards no because it makes you be more careful with heros when using them since you know they wont regenerate for awhile, rather than tossing them in carelessly.
4) What kind of penalty are you imposing? They have already assigned loot bonuses to bases based upon their strength. As the #1 in my clan and the only TH10, if I attack a TH9, the bonus is less than that if I attacked the opposing TH10. That in my eyes is already a penalty. I don't see a reason to penalize it further.
5) Your hero's are active during upgrade during the war the same way your defenses that are being upgraded are, on defense. You cannot use them on offense. There are 100 threads out there already suggesting this that have elaborate discussions, you should check them out.
1. Why is this needed, I disagree until I know why this is neededQuote:
Originally Posted by IlDiavolo
2. First one is ruled out, second one is probably ruled out, and a bad idea, PMing would be abused
3. So here's can be used when they have some health...this would be nice, but still don't know why this is needed.
4. No, just no. Don't be an anti rusher person, if Supercell discourages rushers, then they lose money, just because someone isn't as good as you doesn't mean you criticize them.
5. Has been requested before...use the advanced search tool to see if a similar idea has been posted, before you post.
Seems like your (4) makes it so clean up is pointless.
comments in boldQuote:
Originally Posted by IlDiavolo