Adding A New Hero - Solution To Obvious Problems

I'm not here to propose a new hero, just an idea to make it sensible.

Below are two of the most common complaints I see when it comes to heroes:

- complaints that they can't use upgrading heroes in war attacks
- complaints that adding a new hero would make attacking too OP

So why not solve both problems by adding a new hero. :)

How?

If you add a new hero only allow players to use 2 out of the 3. This would make it possible to upgrade a hero while still attacking with full heroes (two). Doing this would also solve the OP dilemma of using all 3. This would also add a strategical level of attacking and defending ie which 2 of the 3 should be used in certain defenses and specific attacks.

I like it! Supercell, make it so.

I think they already make one.
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...-artefacts-%21

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by domkop

I think they already make one.
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...-artefacts-%21

---

You do realize that post was from April 1st right? Meaning it was probably a joke.

I like the idea of 2 out of 3 or 4. Tactically it opens up some interesting special heros. WB Lich King draws fire and brings WB back to life for another attack.
Giant Lord increases giant speed, helps clear.
Goblin General redirects goblins to attack defences when under fire.
Balloon Barron moves fast triggers air traps by moving in a contracting circular pattern.
Wise Wizard redirects wizards to a single point on map, increases speed, alows player one regroup or renewed focus.
Heavenly healer only heals hero or healers, ability wrath causes all remaining healers to stop healing and deal area effect double damage for a number of seconds until killed.
Dragon Master redirects dragons to a single point on the map, has a low heal to air units rather than damage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by webbie

You do realize that post was from April 1st right? Meaning it was probably a joke.

---

It may have been but its actually a good thought. Even having all three available a requirement to pick which 2 would be an interesting strategy choice one is then forced to make. They could even go right past 3 to make that an even more interesting choice. (And make a fortune in gem sales on the way, no one is going to be able upgrade that many without resorting to gems)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by junyab

I'm not here to propose a new hero, just an idea to make it sensible.

Below are two of the most common complaints I see when it comes to heroes:

- complaints that they can't use upgrading heroes in war attacks
- complaints that adding a new hero would make attacking too OP

So why not solve both problems by adding a new hero. :)

How?

If you add a new hero only allow players to use 2 out of the 3. This would make it possible to upgrade a hero while still attacking with full heroes (two). Doing this would also solve the OP dilemma of using all 3. This would also add a strategical level of attacking and defending ie which 2 of the 3 should be used in certain defenses and specific attacks.

---

i made the exact same thread last week lol

http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...too-simple-%29

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kingrats

i made the exact same thread last week lol

http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...too-simple-%29

---

Nice! Then twice the chance they read one of them. :cool:

I like it, the choice of two our of three hero's can be an interesting strategy. I think depending on what the third hero could be, certain combinations that are more effective against different base layouts or attack strategies. Add another level of strategy without making attacks OP by simply adding the third hero.