Disable kicking/booting of members during war battle

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ironagedave

It depends on the reason why you were booted, did you attack a base that was an easy three stars, well below your belt, thus preventing others from attacking. You may have donated lots but did you donate the right or wrong troops.

If this were to be implemented a real trouble maker who keeps on donating false troops to clan requests and thus f'ing up all attacks for the clan would be imune to being booted.

Leaders and Co's have the power to run a clan the way they see fit - this should not be changed.

---

Here here.

If you got booted from a clan during war and you did attack something your level, than ask yourself, did you really want to stay in that clan anyways? Find a new one, there is too many clans in the game already...

:DIf you have already done at least the 1st attack then even if you have been kicked out of the clan, you take your gained loot!:D

In short, this is a terrible idea. But I'm too long winded to leave it at that. Let's discuss, shall we?

So, as a clan leader, I could have a foul mouthed troll in my clan who keeps telling everyone to 'F off' and keeps filling requests with wall breakers and I wouldn't be able to kick them? Talk about a troll's paradise.

Your original premise is off too. If you attacked and got 3 stars you still get the war win bonus, right? So to say you leave with nothing to show for your efforts is a false statement.

But really this runs deeper than the illogical solution you propose. I see an increasing trend of posts demanding Supercell protect them from bad clans and bad clan mates. These posts include punishments for war time defectors, controls to prevent unwanted donations, controls to prevent co-leaders from kicking members (there is already one, it's called member), & posts like this one requesting controls to prevent leaders from kicking members.

Before having a knee-jerk reaction and jumping on the bandwagon for these types of posts consider two things:

1. There are no controls in the world that will eliminate bad, mean-spirited, or just plain stupid people from the game. It's just not possible. Nope, not possible at all.
2. YOU are the only person who can limit your exposure to these bad, mean-spirited, or just plain stupid people. And I wouldn't want it any other way. YOU have the ability to seek out good clans, run by good leaders, with respectful members.

In short (too late, I know) everyone needs to stop assuming Supercell is responsible for making every clan a good one. If you are being treated unfairly it is most likely because you are in a bad clan. And that is something YOU have the power to control already. You don't need Supercell to fix anything.

no thats idiotic, so you can lock a clan and you cant get rid of anyone who snipes for loot, or causes offence to people in clan, but people can come and go as they please?

think it through

We booted someone after their first attack when we found out he was using aids. No way we were going to allow him to do his second. Not letting the leader control the clan is a terrible idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reddigulous

But really this runs deeper than the illogical solution you propose. I see an increasing trend of posts demanding Supercell protect them from bad clans and bad clan mates. These posts include punishments for war time defectors, controls to prevent unwanted donations, controls to prevent co-leaders from kicking members (there is already one, it's called member), & posts like this one requesting controls to prevent leaders from kicking members.

Before having a knee-jerk reaction and jumping on the bandwagon for these types of posts consider two things:

1. There are no controls in the world that will eliminate bad, mean-spirited, or just plain stupid people from the game. It's just not possible. Nope, not possible at all.
2. YOU are the only person who can limit your exposure to these bad, mean-spirited, or just plain stupid people. And I wouldn't want it any other way. YOU have the ability to seek out good clans, run by good leaders, with respectful members.

In short (too late, I know) everyone needs to stop assuming Supercell is responsible for making every clan a good one. If you are being treated unfairly it is most likely because you are in a bad clan. And that is something YOU have the power to control already. You don't need Supercell to fix anything.

---

Well said sir. And I agree with you on the trends. see several other posts on page one alone that support your point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reddigulous

1. There are no controls in the world that will eliminate bad, mean-spirited, or just plain stupid people from the game. It's just not possible. Nope, not possible at all.
2. YOU are the only person who can limit your exposure to these bad, mean-spirited, or just plain stupid people. And I wouldn't want it any other way. YOU have the ability to seek out good clans, run by good leaders, with respectful members.

---

Right?

And this is what I and a lot of people were saying when we argued for a war opt in/out button. Supercell's initial response had something to do with the clan experience. The problem was that Supercell was trying too hard to control the clan experience, when really the only people that can and should be controlling the clan experience are the leaders.


Long story short if you're a quality member who follows a clan's rules, there should be no reason to kick you, and if they do you're probably in a clan with free co or a rogue leader, and it's their loss because you can find a better clan anyway.