Revise the ToS to Allow Multiple Accounts

Honestly I can see no reason why this is in the ToS. Supercell does not enforce it, and it is commonly known that they do not enforce it. The major YouTubers invited by Supercell to Finland all have multiple accounts. They openly make videos with multiple accounts, and Supercell does nothing to stop them. Clearly, they don't feel like they need to.

So why have this there? The only thing this is doing is scare people into creating a new account, when Supercell doesn't frown upon it or care about it in the slightest.

what do you mean? o_o

you can have multiple accounts on any games... the only exception is forum accounts...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by X7386

Honestly I can see no reason why this is in the ToS. Supercell does not enforce it, and it is commonly known that they do not enforce it. The major YouTubers invited by Supercell to Finland all have multiple accounts. They openly make videos with multiple accounts, and Supercell does nothing to stop them. Clearly, they don't feel like they need to.

So why have this there? The only thing this is doing is scare people into creating a new account, when Supercell doesn't frown upon it or care about it in the slightest.

---

uhm maybe they have multiple devices, phones, pads, old phones - that is still not breaking the TOS you can have multiple accounts as long as you have multiple devices (i.e one account per device), I know there are ♥♥♥♥s but you do that at your own risk and get prone to viruses and spyware etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HydroPenguin

what do you mean? o_o

you can have multiple accounts on any games... the only exception is forum accounts...

---

Actually, the TOS for clash of clans states that multiple accounts on one device is not supported. Depending on how you interpret those words that means something between "not allowed" and "we don't want to support the potential headache of that feature, so try at your own risk". I have never heard of anybody being banned for it so the answer is probably closer to "we don't want the headache".

^^ agree and given the fact that mobile devices don't give off IP type identifiers it would be impossible to police/enforce, hence probably the terminology used in the TOS in that case.