Printable View
We should be able to boost our builder's huts for a limited number of hours to help finish off upgrades faster. This would be done using gems, but it would help get our long haul upgrades done a little bit faster. The boost could be for four or six or more hours. It would help shave at least a few hours off of an upgrade.
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...rum-guidelines
Sorry, but this idea is ruled out. Read the sticky next time before posting.
If you were allowed to boost builders SuperCell would lose lots of money from people boosting rather than finishing early. No Money = No game.
Sorry, but this idea is NOT ruled out. Read the sticky next time before posting.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFailology
Logic Error: If people rarely spend gems on building time reduction, SC is already losing out on money. Why? costs too much currently. If boostable, more people will feel like it is worth spending gems on, because in comparison, it would look to be like an awesome deal.
This post, more or less, falls under upgrading/pileing builders, which all come down to the same result, reducing build time without fully finishing the build. Technically speaking it's ruled out, even if it isn't specifically stated so.Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenJames
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFailology
No, Mr. Failology, it is not ruled out, as WJ said before. It is clearly posted in the 'under consideration' section. I think you should read the stickies more carefully before posting your wrong comments and confusing the entire community.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFailology
oh ... and I made that part big blue if you still cant find it..........:unsure:
Other Buildings Related:
* Add decoy buildings that still get targeted by troops, but yield nothing (fake mine/cannon)
- - - - - - - - - -
* Increase Town Hall resource storage incrementally by level, perhaps 1/2/3/4/5/10/20/30/40/50k?
* Dark Spell Factory for defensive spells - build with dark elixir
* Add a boost option for builders (work at 4x speed for X number of hours)
It isn't a builder boosting thread without at least one person mistaking it for ruled out. :smirk:
That said, this has been talked about many times before. :rolleyes: So really, either 'necro-bump' (technically not a bump if done right) the best thread on this issue back up, or cherry pick quotes that get everyone back up to speed on this issue.
I'm sick of people starting at square one on these dang topics.
And reposting 'Under Consideration' topics isn't helping anyone either, especially when it's a topic that's been reposted and remade over and over and over, and has almost never beenreceived very well.Quote:
Originally Posted by TimothyH97
Doesn't mean that u call it ruled out, politely say that it's been suggested before.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFailology
no, your right, it doesn't;Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFailology
but I was only pointing out that it still isn't a 'ruled out' topic as you had stated before. :cool:
Yeah, my mistake for calling it ruled out, but my point is that it's an over-posted topic that has been denied by the community many times before and I don't think we need another one.Quote:
Originally Posted by BlahBlah161616
(Though, ironically, by being stubborn and continuing to argue Im just bumping the thread back up :facepalm:)
Then perhaps u should stop arguing.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFailology
Actually more or less doesn't really go with it. Warren and I have encountered this suggestion manny times before so that's how we know it's not. There is a difference between the 2 (I was wth you one day and had my mind changed.)Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFailology
The term boosting is different than multiple builders. Say I wanted. Multiple spell factors vs a spell factory boost. There is a difference between the two (if you imagine not having the ability to boost spells this is what it would come down to.)
There is subtle difference between 'denied', 'ignored', or 'died'. Granted, I do admit that it is annoying to see new threads start the topic back up, only to have none of the previous work that was done before anywhere on it, until some of us people that have talked about it before come in and more or less (usually less) continue where we left off at.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFailology
I have never seen any 'community' deny this once since I've been here. Spam-buried and forgotten, yes. Denied? Questionable at best from what I've seen.
I'm sorry, but you really really need to work on your terminology, at the very least. You are unfortunately living up to your namesake rather well at this rate. :straightface: