Idea for when a player leaves after being locked into war...

Good idea but what happens if the person who leaves is the lowest person in war? Who would be able to use their attacks

I love this idea!

Simply because of the fact that you can't predict if one of your members (even the most loyal) can betray you and leave. Now what? There's nothing you can do and it's a disadvantage even before the war starts. There should be a plan B. As it has been mentioned before, if a lower level member picks these attacks there's not really a way to exploit it since it's not using bigger armies than the original attacker.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bnb525

I love this idea!

Simply because of the fact that you can't predict if one of your members (even the most loyal) can betray you and leave. Now what? There's nothing you can do and it's a disadvantage even before the war starts. There should be a plan B. As it has been mentioned before, if a lower level member picks these attacks there's not really a way to exploit it since it's not using bigger armies than the original attacker.

---

That is a breakdown of leadership. Knowing your players and where they stand is part of the job. If you are thinking your most loyal guy left then clearly you are falling down on the job. I mean, really, think about what you said there. How can you say they are your most loyal if they betrayed you. Learn to separate what you want to think from what's real. That's an important skill for a manager to have.

My main issue with this is that it can be exploited. For example, a TH7 that you know personally joins your clan. You tell him to leave and a TH10 in your clan claims his attacks. This could spell disaster, a TH10 could wipe out half the opponents bases in a war.

Secondly, this encourages hoppers. When hoppers are in war, they usually even have the heart to think "Ya know what? I'll get loot for this war anyways and these guys need me", but if you include this feature, hoppers will hop more than they usually do.

The best fix is for leaders and elders of clans to make sure people don't war ASAP. For example, my clan Annihil-8 has new members go through a feeder clan for a period of time (usually 1 day to 7 days) to 1. make sure they understand our rules, 2. Get to know us better and 3. Avoid hopping

This would easily be exploited and will never happen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kyleksq

The two players MUST be ranked lower than the player who left (otherwise the #1 and #2 guys will take the raids)

Your thoughts, your questions?

---

I apologize, I didn't realize this was a qualifier, this makes me like your idea a little bit more. Enough to say that it's a good idea, just not good enough it that it will be implemented

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lce9665

Good idea but what happens if the person who leaves is the lowest person in war? Who would be able to use their attacks

---

Good point.

Really wish more people understood that ranking has absolutely nothing to do with offensive capability.

Wouldn't make a difference at a maxed out TH 10s clans.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rwelshjr

That is a breakdown of leadership. Knowing your players and where they stand is part of the job. If you are thinking your most loyal guy left then clearly you are falling down on the job. I mean, really, think about what you said there. How can you say they are your most loyal if they betrayed you. Learn to separate what you want to think from what's real. That's an important skill for a manager to have.

---

Its a game, it's not a job, there is no leadership, there is a community that only stay around as long as they get what they asked for