Printable View
It would be interesting (and keep me from getting as annoyed) if you could revenge anyone who'd attacked you so long as they're not online. Its frustrating that 80% of those who attacked me have shields because they got town hall sniped. I personally think it would be a good mechanic and make revenges more punishing (similar to how more trophies are rewarded for revenge).
I think this is a good idea to help deter snipers and make people think twice b4 they attack someone.Quote:
Originally Posted by JorjeRamirez
That's a bad idea, no offense. Shields would be useless, as you could still get attacked while under them. Top players could easily revenge other guys without searching, demolishing them. Zapping would be rampant, as th7s would punish th9s who were nice enough to leave them with only a shield.. Nope, against this idea
So if you boosted your barracks and did 40 barch attacks you can get attacked 40 times overnight?
Seems fair.
Wahhhhhhhhhhh!
No no no no no no no!! :facepalm:
Although I would like the idea of revenging that one guy named who has 5k DE at the bottom of my revenge list who always has a shield....I don't like the idea because I would be attacked even when I have a shield. It pretty much defeats the purpose of shields.Quote:
Originally Posted by SirVargan
You are dead on there. I personally like people who just snipe me, so long as they don't have a ton of loot.Quote:
Originally Posted by SirVargan
LOL, you got your back up to revenge someone that got you real good and they are under a shield and you just can't stand it. That's just too funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by JorjeRamirez
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwelshjr
I am usually sniped by weaker players with no loot. I wouldn't have a reason to revenge them. :p
I revenge on everyone who barches me. Unless they are too strong.Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainSport
It may take me a month or more to be able to do it. What's the difference, your 40 snipe/barch victims in one night, or over forty nights?