Male Archer

Male archers have wider range than Female archers because they have more power!(Please be polite ladies.It's just for this game!)

Training cost:L1 20 DE/L2 25 DE/L3 30 DE/L4 45 DE
Training time:5 minutes
Attack range:5 tiles more than female archers
Favourite target:First CC troops,then nearest building(Any)
Housing Space:10
Damage type:Normal
Special ability:Each attack deals some damage to building that is behind the target(Just building)
Damage per second:55

Why make this? This is pointless. It has no merits. No. This isn't making much sense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AnthonyVince

Wow that was harsh, but he is sort of right. We don't need a male version of the archer, and it's special ability is not good enough to be used in higher leagues.

---

But if special ability deals more damage by upgrading troop...?

First off, this would encourage sexism. Although I am a guy, I bet any girls that play this game will be frustrated by the "guys are stronger than girls" stereotype. Goodness, even some girls that I know can beat me in at sports.

Second off, this is an exact copy of an archer. You might be thinking, well it has a special ability! So what? This is a ground ranged troop, named the exact same as an archer but with a "male", and a pretty non-special "special ability".

At least be original!

-Fiery4Jayden

How about we also add female barbarians, goblins, giants, hog riders and wizards! I know, it creates a weird image. But it also increases sexism...and not all boys are stronger than girls, you know. Also, I agree with the others...this is pretty pointless. It's basically the same as an archer.

Sorry if I come off kind of rude, I'm kind of biased against this especially since I am a girl (don't let the name "Bob" fool you, it's a long story).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NavidAfgNaseriAfg

But if special ability deals more damage by upgrading troop...?

---

It's not exactly a special ability, though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IamBobtheFirst

How about we also add female barbarians, goblins, giants, hog riders and wizards! I know, it creates a weird image. But it also increases sexism...and not all boys are stronger than girls, you know. Also, I agree with the others...this is pretty pointless. It's basically the same as an archer.

Sorry if I come off kind of rude, I'm kind of biased against this especially since I am a girl (don't let the name "Bob" fool you, it's a long story).

---

As you see,I said that It's just for this game and I don't have any idea about power of boys and girls and if supercell employees have some creativity,(and I'm sure that they have),they WILL choose a better name,and add other abilities to this troop.So,PLEASE BE POLITE

Encouraging sexism is never good. Thank god this idea would never be considered

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mrkw

Why make this? This is pointless. It has no merits. No. This isn't making much sense.

---

I agree, it wouldn't be any different than making a female wizard or other troop. New dark troops have to have a special purpose. The lava hound's purpose was to be an air-defense giant so air troops weren't picked off so easily. I see why it is becoming hard for developers to make new troops.

I already suggested a troop like this before,only that he is using a shotgun instead and has a spread-shot attack.
Anyways,ladies who play this game would get mad...