Well, you CAN boost your barrack and you CAN buy the army directly
you CAN boost your Collectors and you CAN buy the resources directly
Do you notice something? :rolleyes:
Printable View
A stipulation? Don't think that is needed. But you are on point that. there could be much more gem buying because of how good a deal it seems.
Huh, keep the options simple. A week long? Who will do that?
I did pricing and boost time with a 4x boost and came up with this.
Logic seemed to dictate 6 hours for a boost, since things that are measured in a day or so are common (6 hours × 4 = 24hr or 1 day). And gave a 12 hour boost so you can keep the boost going constantly without pause much easier.
6hr boost I suggested as 40 gems, and 12h boost 70 gems (since there is a common thing of reduced cost the more you spend).
Yeah. Every thread, every single one, on this topic has one person saying it is ruled out. I was a bit over dramatic on the post... Idk, just felt like it for some reason. Guess I wanted to sound more angry than I actually was.
(note: to give some background, last few posts I've said I was feeling too numb to care on most issues. So actually, my angry post was kind of a fake angry rant... unless you count being ♥♥♥♥♥♥ at depression, which I have so much experience hating it, that I could be a perfect ranting standup comedian on the topic.)
Take some Econ 101. You'll then understand the potential of this idea afterwards.
Please see the list of already suggested ideas. This idea has already been suggested (and ruled out).
I would go for the same way it is with resource buildings, twice the speed for 1 day. Dont compare it with the Barracks/spell boost, because the army/spell build time is much lower than building build time so 2 hours are enough there.
1 Week boost? Look at the upgrade times at townhall 8-10. They take 10-14 days each. So a 14 days upgrade would take 7 days.
I think boosting builders are good, but it just takes SC a little while to see if it's marketable or not, and some balance issues
boosting should be a bit "cheaper" as compared to the instant
cheaper as in, more bang for the buck
RULED OUT = this idea
Next guy that mistakes this idea as ruled out, after saying several times it is not, I'm reporting as a troll. Got it?
I don't threaten reports lightly. This constant claiming it is ruled out is a waste of time, it spreads false info that people can wind up believing, and it is just counterproductive as a whole. I'm quickly running out of ideas to get this point drilled into people's heads that this is not ruled out, and if threatening to report them is what it takes to get that message across, so be it. Not my problem that people are making carless mistakes when they should know better. I can understand one or two mistakes early on, but repeats are not excusable. You claim it is ruled out after this point, you didn't read either the thread or the sticky thread, and therefore it is your fault.
Added edit:
WarrenJames http://supercell-forum-content.s3.am...ser-online.png
I'M BATMAN!
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: U.S.A. Indiana
Posts: 1,669
What, are you dense? Are you ♥♥♥♥♥♥ed or something? Who the hell do you think I am?
I'm the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Batman!
(What are the forum ranks currently In case anyone wants to know and varify)