Being kicked from a NH should still provide derby rewards
When a player is kicked from a neighborhood, they should still be eligible to receive the rewards earned by the neighborhood in the currently running derby if the member was present in the neighborhood when the derby started. This prevents neighborhood leaders from abusing new members by kicking them after they have contributed but before the derby ends.
Its true that under this system, even players who get kicked early in the derby cycle may gain access to rewards earned after they were kicked but before the derby ends. This is preferable to the alternative: that neighborhood leaders can kick members without warning or reason, and cost the player resources they contributed to the derby (for example, using up rare lures to accomplish fishing tasks).
A kicked player who subsequently joins a new neighborhood before the current derby ends should still receive rewards from the old neighborhood's progress in the current derby. Rationale: players who join a neighborhood cannot participate in that neighborhood's derby until the current derby ends, so there is no reward overlap.
member kicked out of NH should still get rewards
Giving rewards to those kicked out of a neighbourhood does not take into account those who are kicked out because they do not contribute to the neighbourhood, do not participate in the derby and expect to ask for help from others but don't reciprocate. Why treat all leaders as malicious and untrustworthy? where is the deterrent if people can claim rewards no matter what they do or don't do?
why isn't there a structured system?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
haydaygirl03
Okay i get your point . But there are frequently members who do not participate in the derby AT ALL meaning that they get prizes for holding the neighborhood back from first once we were 10 points behind 1st this wouldn't have happened if 8 members from our derby never contributed its unfair so you decides enough is enough and you kick them out in the middle of the derby this is the only way to stop unparticipants from collecting prizes for other peoples hard word . Money and sometimes diamonds
Why not, if your score is within 10% of the neighborhood average you get full share, if it is 20% lower then you lose 1 horseshoe,,,, 30% lower lose 2 horseshoes and so forth,,, I've heard computers are pretty good at calculating this stuff,, maybe even a bonus horseshoe for the best performer