Thanks for the shout out!Quote:
Originally Posted by edomingox
Printable View
Thanks for the shout out!Quote:
Originally Posted by edomingox
I like how everybody is talking about just leaving the clan if the leader abuses the power. This is a much bigger deal now with clan levels because everyone will have to start over. I would also argue, that the leaders who have a widespread problem in their clan of people donating bad/wrong troops to others, they are exactly the leaders who will abuse the power.
All the tools are available to prevent this from happening in your clan, if you chose not to opt new people out of wars, opt poor donaters out of wars, boot people who do this consistently, you are basically asking for the problem to continue and your clan deserves to have the problem, you don't deserve more power because you don't even know what to do with the power you have.
This is something often asked for by poor leaders. They cant lead people to do as they are supposed to so they want to instead micromanage to do it all themselves.
Leadership is getting everyone on the same page to follow the plan you have set them to. Those that cannot do it should suffer the consequences which are of course a clan that is disorganized and lower quality. Ultimately this clan loses to the others without those problems. Its a competition so this is entirely fair and proper that the better clans win over the lesser ones. the game should not be giving special powers or really anything that is just to cover for someone's deficiencies.
That's a great idea.
It will help to win the clan war easier.
Yeah, it's a great idea! I think that, also, for the sake of the clan, the leader should have to approve what other members of the clan are upgrading, what troops they use for the battles, hell, we should even let the leader attack for inactive members of the clan. I mean it will help win the clan war easier!Quote:
Originally Posted by domkop
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwelshjr
you do realise kids play this game right? kids are dumb and they do stuff even when you tell them not too, dont donate goblins to the clan castles kids
really you are telling me not to do that? i'm goina do it just to see what you do, lol i got away with that i'll keep doing it cos they can't tell its me
lol they are getting really mad and i am getting away with it
if this was real war with real troops then leaders might be to blame, but this is a game and most of the time kids dont listen
just because you have a clan where it doesn't happen doesn't mean that the issue does not need addressing
It's never happened in my clan. This is because a lot of clans just want war fillers. So they send troops to seem cool. There is no reason to add this simply because a leader can't control his clan. They do it once; kick. The likelihood of anyone else doing it; will be slim to none if they're not new. This is a leadership issue and is reflected upon how the leader manages a clan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ectar
Sorry for revive an old thread
This idea is superb...
I believe CC the TS mention is CC in WAR MAPS...
In normal map CC or what troops a member wish to war with, it is solely base owner control
Why there is a debate about controlling member base..?
It is really unnecessary and time consuming...
Leader/Co couldn't be know what best troops a member can use, Leader/Co can only suggest.
Strongest troops for a member, might be the weakest to another.
BUT for war clan..a good leader will review each base and enemy strength, and forecast what will be enemy use to attack, therefore the Leader can decide what's best troops to defend...
And there is NO way to know who donate weak troops in WAR CC (unless they stupid enough to fill all the CC)
+1 for this idea
interesting but keep in mind how much trouble it will cause in clans