War loot bonus based on the numbers of star

Hi everyone.

I personally think that the bonus loot gained by winning a war attack should be based on the number of star you made in that attack, just like trophies are.

So when you attack someone's base, the bonus loot is shown on their base, but you get one third if you make one star, half the bonus if you make two, and the entire bonus if you 3-star the opponent's base.

If this gets implemented, then you should also adjust all war bonus loot—this means that you won't just take the existing bonus loot and divide it by 3, you'll probably want to increase it because 3-starring a base is very different from 1-starring it, but players have always received the same amount of war bonus loot.

So let's say a player has a war bonus loot of 350k and 2k DE with the current system.
If someone 2-stars that base, they are only going to get 175k and 1k, which is not that much.

Hence, to balance the mechanic, you should raise the loot bonus for example to 500k and 2.8k, so that a player 2-starring that base will get 250k and 1.4k which is more fair IMO.

Hope you will consider adding this feature to the game :)

i dont like it. bcuz you must pay for high cost elixir troops. and if they will do that then it will be horrible to do wars.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DutchdestroyerNL

i dont like it. bcuz you must pay for high cost elixir troops. and if they will do that then it will be horrible to do wars.

---

When you attack in war you are supposed to do the best you can.

I said that bonuses should be raised so that if you only 1- or 2-star a base you will not penalized so much, and you'll get a bonus that is nearly the same as in the current system.

The idea is to kinda reward players that succeed in 3-starring enemy bases and also to encourage players to invest in wars because if it goes well, they will be fairly rewarded.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DutchdestroyerNL

i dont like it. bcuz you must pay for high cost elixir troops. and if they will do that then it will be horrible to do wars.

---

That didn't make any sense.

I support this idea.

Currently the loot I earn from wars falls about 300K short of filling up my clan castle completely on any given war. What's the point of having such a big storage front if I can never fill it? This makes sense to me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DutchdestroyerNL

i dont like it. bcuz you must pay for high cost elixir troops. and if they will do that then it will be horrible to do wars.

---

Apparently you don't like to do well for your clan in wars

let say that you have a war 10 vs 10. The first 5 attack right from the start and they each get 5/6 stars with both attack. The others are later and see that all stars have been taken. So the early birds get the lood. This would ruin the whole idee of clanwars.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JHMR

let say that you have a war 10 vs 10. The first 5 attack right from the start and they each get 5/6 stars with both attack. The others are later and see that all stars have been taken. So the early birds get the lood. This would ruin the whole idee of clanwars.

---

the bonus would not depend on the stars you "add" to your clan's counter, but the stars that you actually make while attacking.

if a base got 1-starred and I 3-star it, I'll get the 3-star bonus, not the 2-star one.

Quote:

---

the bonus would not depend on the stars you "add" to your clan's counter, but the stars that you actually make while attacking.

---

That way is not how coc counts with clanwars

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JHMR

That way is not how coc counts with clanwars

---

it is a different matter.
if it were as you said, then if I attacked a base that had already got at least 1-starred, I should not get any bonus at all.

but it isn't so.

horrible idea i must say...especially for th10....u know its nearly impossible for a th10 to 3 star a th10....will discourage people from doing wars....