Printable View
Several problems with this
a: intereferes with war automatic no.
b: opposing clan can pick anyone even the most useless player
c: if its automatic then how is it determined? If its by stars then what if two players get 6 stars on their number and one down?
it just wouldn't be fair to only have 1 mvp in that case.
D: it's not needed and would be a waste of time to create due to heroic attack and heroic defense feature
e: could work on real ideas rather than work on a useless feature such as this
That's why it should be the MVP of the other clan your clan votes on. Well, not exactly a vote, but the leader chooses one. In the original post, it was said that to make leaders choose an MVP, they couldn't start another war if they didn't or didn't get their MVP bonus loot. That's a good thought so I think that co-leaders should also be allowed to chose an MVP, therefore if you want to start a war but your leader still needs to pick an MVP, a co leader can do it. If no co leader is on your clan can't start a war anyways. Good ideas about extra war loot and narrowing the MVP choices down to three to prevent an ironic choice. This will also let clans know that it is also important to have good sportsmanship in war. I know this is a long reply, but all in all, a good idea to have a war MVP.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShinonZero
Most heroic attack and heroic defense should be dumped for something like this. Most heroic attack usually goes to a lucky bad strategy attack, and most heroic defense to luck for being attacked by a high level inept player.
A) As he stated you have to choose 1 of 3 players. Takes only a second to do. Doesn't interfere with war.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShinonZero
B) Opposing player can pick 1 of 3 players nominated by own clan.
C) Not sure what you're referring to here
D) Heroic attack/defense is silly and doesn't often choose the attack or defense that is the most meaningful.
E) This is a real idea