Most Valuable Player NEW clan wars feature

Hi all, Firstly really liking the new war additions but was hoping we could get a bit more from it.

Put simply i think there is room to add a "MOST VALUABLE PLAYER" for each team for the war.

This feature would allow the clan leaders of each clan to choose the MVP for the opposing team. maybe a player that has hit higher than expected, gained a great star or two, or just smashed 6 stars.

At the end of each war the leader is given the option to choose the MVP for the opposition. The chosen player will receive a 50% boost on their war loot bonus.

It should also be added to the player achievement stars showing the number of MVP awarded.

If you like this then i have clarified a few possible issues here;


To combat the possibility of leaders not choosing then a few additions could be implemented as follows;

~Their clans MVP wont be rewarded until they have voted for the opposition.
~They can not start the next war until they have voted.

Finally, if it is anticipated that leaders might make "bizarre" MVP' votes then it could be restricted to three players to choose from that are nominated by the players own clan.

I am fully aware we currently have a most heroic attack/defence but that doesnt really show the true heros of a war.

Thanks for taking the time to read,

COC name Sausage
Clan 18+ Adult War

Nice Idea...THis could be based on average number of war stars and troops donated right?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mrkw

Nice Idea...THis could be based on average number of war stars and troops donated right?

---

It could be as complicated as troops donated, stars gained, defences won.

Or as simple as a vote, or limited vote from the opposition

It's a cool and unique idea. I would like it... that being said...
The issue is that this makes it more complicated of a game. I understand that it is a simple thing to do, but you are forcing another thing that a leader must do. And as most mobile gaems are geared towards the casual gamer there are a lot that would not be a fan of this idea.

I like the idea. But in my opinion it does not necessarily have to be a person who determines who the MVP should be. If the game is able to present the most heroic attack/defense, it may also just choose the MVP by its own. 50% war loot bonus is an all right reward I guess. Hope this idea gets a bit attention in the future. :thumbsup:

I think this is a good idea! 👍👍

A great idea! However, I think the leader and co leaders should have the voting opportunity. Also, 50% boost to loot is a bit much, how about 30% for losing side, 20% for winning side?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CaptainSport

A great idea! However, I think the leader and co leaders should have the voting opportunity. Also, 50% boost to loot is a bit much, how about 30% for losing side, 20% for winning side?

---

Yeah, 50% is a really high number, maybe 25% bonus if you win war and only a10% if you lose.

Also, maybe at the end of the war, you get to select who you think on the enemy team (or your side if it is better like that) did the best in the war, and the most voted person gets the loot. And if it is a tie between 2 people, a re-vote is cast.

Its a good idea properly used. But there can also be hard feelings in some cases and I can see a lot of ways it can be abused or situations where guys start abusing leaders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rwelshjr

Its a good idea properly used. But there can also be hard feelings in some cases and I can see a lot of ways it can be abused or situations where guys start abusing leaders.

---

Yeah exactly, I feel like some members would start bickering saying who deserves it.