If we were going to add a position? I would make a person who could promote but not kick, or have a kicking limit, like one kick per 12 hours, so they could be contained. Like a co, just with kicking limits.
Printable View
If we were going to add a position? I would make a person who could promote but not kick, or have a kicking limit, like one kick per 12 hours, so they could be contained. Like a co, just with kicking limits.
Exactly! 2200361, I don't think you really understand this idea. THE GENERAL LEADER IS FOR THE MOST LOYAL CO. If the leader has any brains the clan won't be ruined from the General Leader kicking everyone because....... (1) The General Leader is mainly there to take over for the leader's absences, so the leader isn't going to give the General Leader to a random member. It will be someone who he fully trusts (like someone he knows!), not someone who will be one kicking the whole clan. (2) You don't need a General Leader if you don't fully trust anyone to take over for you as a leader!
This is a great idea.
And 2200361, this is not a position for someone who can't kick or can kick only once everyone 12 hours. This is a position HIGHER than a co; a second leader! And like I said earlier, you don't even need to have a General Leader if you don't trust anyone enough.
wrong sub forum
and co leaders are the second leaders lol this position is point less
Co leaders aren't anything, if you can have infinite Co leaders, then what's the point? In a 50/50 clan there is probobly 5 or 6 co leaders, none are 2ndleader, they can just kick all who are below them. So for a general leader, it is 2nd, can do everything a Co can except they can also kick them too, They are (as Sam already said) the most loyal people, someone the leader knows irl or highly ingame. So that if a Co does something irresponsible or stupid, the general leader has access to releive them of their Co-Ledaer position and make them elder, member, or just kick them.