Anti-♥♥♥♥♥

I didn't see these in the already ignored requests:

1) Allow attacks when users are online. You can snapshot the immediate state of the base and allow the attack against that. Removes the "stay online forever" ♥♥♥♥s people use.

2) Require multiple back to back losses of > 2 star before any shield is given when in champion leagues. Maybe even lower?

Can you please get rid of the hears so I can understand? Thank you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 3dengr

I didn't see these in the already ignored requests:

1) Allow attacks when users are online. You can snapshot the immediate state of the base and allow the attack against that. Removes the "stay online forever" ♥♥♥♥s people use. So you can never save resources? Really!?

2) Require multiple back to back losses of > 2 star before any shield is given when in champion leagues. Maybe even lower? I'm pretty sure you wouldn't want to be attacked hundreds of times when going to bed. So why should they?

---

These requests are horrible. Responses in red.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Katsukic7

Can you please get rid of the hears so I can understand? Thank you.

---

5 hearts = cheát
4 hearts = háck

Forum censorship.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hesto25

These requests are horrible. Responses in red.

---

Your responses are horrible. Responses in red.

Quote:

---

So you can never save resources? Really!?

---

You can save resources by having a good base defense, buying shields, or getting shields from losses. You can't avoid being attacked and hide from the rest of the world.

Quote:

---

I'm pretty sure you wouldn't want to be attacked hundreds of times when going to bed. So why should they?

---

There's quite a bit of difference between 2 and "hundreds". And I expect to be attacked when going to bed because I don't use a stay-online exploit or agreements with a bunch of people in my league to attack me so I can have a shield and keep those below us from ever being able to move up. Of course, if I did, then I would no longer be able to exploit as easily or as cheaply.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 3dengr

Your responses are horrible. Responses in red.

You can save resources by having a good base defense, buying shields, or getting shields from losses. You can't avoid being attacked and hide from the rest of the world.
So you get a shield while raiding. That you'll have to break it to continue raiding? So you want people to never raid in this game and rely on collectors then, I guess.

There's quite a bit of difference between 2 and "hundreds". And I expect to be attacked when going to bed because I don't use a stay-online exploit or agreements with a bunch of people in my league to attack me so I can have a shield and keep those below us from ever being able to move up. Of course, if I did, then I would no longer be able to exploit as easily or as cheaply. You said that champions would not get a shield until they get 3 starred (You said >2 stars). That means that theoretically, they could be attacked infinite times and lose infinite trophies until they get back down to masters.

---

Let's try this again, shall we. Responses in green.

Your first response makes no sense. There's no mechanic even in what you stated that would discourage raiding. You got a shield. Do you stop raiding because you have a shield? If so, you're wasting your time. Your rate of loot accumulation goes way down if you're relying on collectors only. Today, if I want, I stick my base way outside my defenses. I get a shield for 11 hours almost every attack while losing no resources. Every time I log in, I have to break a shield to attack. But I do that because I can rack up a good increase in loot before I get attacked again.

Your second response is more appropriate. The algorithm has to be more intelligent than >2 stars. It needs to be play tested internally before a rollout and maybe 2 stars isn't the limit. Without play testing and looking at the game statistics, it's not worth having the discussion. They need to do that to determine what's right. What we have right now is too easily exploited.

hmm, you want to raid ppl online, you say they can save because they will get a shield, you say they need to break that shield to raid to get more resources than collectors can supply...and you don't see the circle you have created ??

Allowing raids on ppl online (if technically possible) changes the entire dynamic or "raid, build, rest" for many players

So some ppl use unfair means to protect loot..get over it. there is still plenty of loot to be had if you look around, change leagues and be patient.

I don't ge this

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DeepFriedBanana

I don't ge this

---

You and me both, friend.