4 STAR SYSTEM!!! CLAN WARS (Increase the game dynamics)

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

April 21st, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Retell

I like it .cool

Thank you for your support!
April 22nd, 2015
vinsnd

I agreed on your idea but with little change.i would rather suggest 5 star battle.as they keep track of 25%,50%,75%,100% and town hall down,it wont be difficult to implement this.

This is the breakdown how it will work:-
25% damage - 1 star(+1 star,if th is down)
50% damage - 2 star(+1 star,if th is down)
75% damage - 3 star(+1 star,if th is down)
100% damage- 5 star
April 22nd, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by vinsnd

I agreed on your idea but with little change.i would rather suggest 5 star battle.as they keep track of 25%,50%,75%,100% and town hall down,it wont be difficult to implement this.

This is the breakdown how it will work:-
25% damage - 1 star(+1 star,if th is down)
50% damage - 2 star(+1 star,if th is down)
75% damage - 3 star(+1 star,if th is down)
100% damage- 5 star

No a 25% victory don't make any sense. We need a gap closer between 50% and 100% for people who are skilled, but can not reach the nearly impossible to 3 star (without ♥♥♥♥♥♥e)
April 23rd, 2015
vinsnd

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skenderbeu

No a 25% victory don't make any sense. We need a gap closer between 50% and 100% for people who are skilled, but can not reach the nearly impossible to 3 star (without ♥♥♥♥♥♥e)

I dont mind if anyone 1 star or 2 star me in 5 star battle.remember this in 3 star battle 2 star is consider as fail below th10 and include even th9.if i am th9 and some 1 star or 2 star me in 5 star battle that is considered as defence win.

Now come with th10 problem as gap between 2 star and 3 star is so huge.to minimize the complexness of 4 star mechanism and this huge gap of 2 star and 3 star,5 star system is much more stable.
April 23rd, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by vinsnd

I dont mind if anyone 1 star or 2 star me in 5 star battle.remember this in 3 star battle 2 star is consider as fail below th10 and include even th9.if i am th9 and some 1 star or 2 star me in 5 star battle that is considered as defence win.

Now come with th10 problem as gap between 2 star and 3 star is so huge.to minimize the complexness of 4 star mechanism and this huge gap of 2 star and 3 star,5 star system is much more stable.

i agree that in the actual 3star system below th10 is considered a fail. The point is that 25% to get a bonus loot is unacceptable because there wont be any fails and people would start abuse with it. what do you think?
April 23rd, 2015
Java9

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skenderbeu

i agree that in the actual 3star system below th10 is considered a fail. The point is that 25% to get a bonus loot is unacceptable because there wont be any fails and people would start abuse with it. what do you think?

yep even a th 7 will 25% a th10 easy and get an amazing bnus which is completely unfair:facepalm:
April 23rd, 2015
Caguggenmos

I personally don't think the system is broken and would be okay keeping it 3 stars. However, i like your idea and am always interested in giving new stuff a try when it has been thought out and wouldn't hurt the game in any way. Your 4 star system is a good idea; no reason not to have discussion about it and maybe give it a shot someday.
April 23rd, 2015
ecstasiate

Generally not a bad idea. After reading through countless pages here, I am not swayed either way. There may be however, better/simpler ways to go about breaking draws....

My personal favorite would be a sudden death round, ClanWar is Extended for a set amount of time and everyone gets one more attack. this would never work for many reasons but i think it would be cool nonetheless :)

you could also simply break ties by giving the win to the clan with more average destruction. like winning a boxing match by points and not K.O. This would elimate the problem of clans that obviously outplayed thier enemy being shafted with bad rewards and you dont have to add any stars. The average destruction feature is already in place....
April 24th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by ecstasiate

Generally not a bad idea. After reading through countless pages here, I am not swayed either way. There may be however, better/simpler ways to go about breaking draws....

My personal favorite would be a sudden death round, ClanWar is Extended for a set amount of time and everyone gets one more attack. this would never work for many reasons but i think it would be cool nonetheless :)

you could also simply break ties by giving the win to the clan with more average destruction. like winning a boxing match by points and not K.O. This would elimate the problem of clans that obviously outplayed thier enemy being shafted with bad rewards and you dont have to add any stars. The average destruction feature is already in place....

Its not about breaking draw but to make a difference from a barely 50%+th from nearly 80% attacks that get same 2 stars
April 26th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by destroyer14

I like this idea supercell should add this even tho they probably wont

Thank you!
April 27th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by merterkan

/signed
I get %86 percent but ı have 1 star its bad:/

Thank You!!
April 27th, 2015
irmtfan

Im on it. like it and vote for it.
Just think its better to have 3 star at 85% instead of 75% cause you have one star in 50%.
so you need 35%+50% = 85% for another star.

100% means you have skilled to fully destroyed the base so worth it 4 stars!
April 28th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by irmtfan

im on it. Like it and vote for it.
Just think its better to have 3 star at 85% instead of 75% cause you have one star in 50%.
So you need 35%+50% = 85% for another star.

100% means you have skilled to fully destroyed the base so worth it 4 stars!

it`s important to add another star between the 50% - 100%. It can be 85% if supercell do some different calc
April 28th, 2015
Topherccino

I agree. The gap between achieving 2 stars and 3 stars is too large.
April 29th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chwim

although it would be more balenced with a 5 star system and also probably easyer to implement

Thank you!
April 30th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Air Sweeper

HAHAHAHAHAH!! Now with the air sweeper it`s like " Forget the 3 Stars". The only way to 3Star a maxed th10 base was with Lava + Balloons and with a high Lvl King & Queen. I have never seen a golem attack to 3 stare a Maxed th10 int the last year. I think a 4 star system is more needed than ever now to make the difference.
May 2nd, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by MayurGarg

Instead of Star at 50% and 75% destruction...
we can have stars at 33% and 66% destruction..!!
or at 40% and 70% destruction..!!
Just equally space them..!! :smirk:

No a 33% victory would ruin the game!!
May 4th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by k2aries

LOVE this idea. For many reasons, most of which are already stated in this feed. But I also think this might mitigate some of the issues clans face with poor war matchups.

Thank you!!
May 19th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chinatown13

I like this idea :) will it mean you get less trophies if you snipe the town hall?

Thank you!!
May 19th, 2015
MrkSjr

there was recently a post here in the I&FR about the balloon's 7th level. now we can 4 star bases.
May 20th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrkSjr

there was recently a post here in the I&FR about the balloon's 7th level. now we can 4 star bases.

What do you mean! Be more clear!
May 20th, 2015
MrkSjr

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skenderbeu

What do you mean! Be more clear!

just something about... a suggestion that was posted here recently... requesting for lv7 balloon.... nvm.
May 24th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrkSjr

just something about... a suggestion that was posted here recently... requesting for lv7 balloon.... nvm.

heheh ok. Thank you anyway!
May 24th, 2015
Jakez9776

I support

I've read almost the whole post...it's a good idea... And guys stop confusing yourself...the author knows what he's saying and stop complicating things...just read the first post and consider it and stop confusing yourselves
May 25th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by jakez9776

i've read almost the whole post...it's a good idea... And guys stop confusing yourself...the author knows what he's saying and stop complicating things...just read the first post and consider it and stop confusing yourselves

thank you!!
May 25th, 2015
BakedAir

alternative

OR Supercell adds a new troop -.-
May 25th, 2015
BoomBangBoi

Support ONLY in clan wars- normal multiplayer battles are fine as is.
May 25th, 2015
LeoMaxi

brilliant

I think this is a great idea, but as you said only for the top ths
May 25th, 2015
jayarr

Agree

Good post, like this idea.
I tried the beta on DomiNations, 5 stars is lame, 4 stars total with the aditional star at 75% seems balanced.
May 26th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomBangBoi

Support ONLY in clan wars- normal multiplayer battles are fine as is.

Thank you!!
May 27th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by leomaxi

i think this is a great idea, but as you said only for the top ths

thank you for supporting!
May 28th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayarr

Good post, like this idea.
I tried the beta on DomiNations, 5 stars is lame, 4 stars total with the aditional star at 75% seems balanced.

Thank You!!!
May 28th, 2015
MATHSTER

My comment.

Great Idea!!!! I wish they would also add a 4th star to the achievements :D
May 28th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by BakedAir

OR Supercell adds a new troop -.-

Thanks for your comment. New troops are always welcomed!
May 29th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by MATHSTER

Great Idea!!!! I wish they would also add a 4th star to the achievements :D

Thank you! Yes new achievements should be added too!
May 29th, 2015
kingali

Not Bad But.....

This is idea is good but it can also ruin game environment a bit
Dont take me wrong but it will affect whole game and most clans will be evenly matched!
Good Idea
May 29th, 2015
Wrxeter

I agree... but I would rather see 5 stars in war.

1 for TH
1 for 50%
1 for 70%
1 for 90%
1 for 100%
May 29th, 2015
Heitor212

Just change one thing...

For getting the 75% destruction star, instead input 85%. 75% is too easy to get. Other than that, the idea is great! (Well, only for clan wars, multiplayer is already good as it is).
May 29th, 2015
Heitor212

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wrxeter

I agree... but I would rather see 5 stars in war.

1 for TH
1 for 50%
1 for 70%
1 for 90%
1 for 100%

Man, thats too many stars...
May 29th, 2015
Brasen

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wrxeter

I agree... but I would rather see 5 stars in war.

1 for TH
1 for 50%
1 for 70%
1 for 90%
1 for 100%

I think the only reason people "want" to see 5 stars is because its a rounded number. Beyond that it really holds no purpose over the 4 star system.

The reason for going from a 3 star to a 4 star system is due to the skill gap difference between a 50% attack to a 100% attack, its gargantuan... as in astronomical especially when talking about MAX TH10 bases. Your essentially rewarding an extra star to a player who did an exceptional attack and nearly wiped out a base versus a player who did an ok-good attack and got the same 2 stars for barely taking out half a base.

Any more stars than that just doesn't hold much value beyond being aesthetically pleasing or "just because". Not to mention the game is already coded to recognize a 75% destruction on a base so it should be easier to implement.

This would be a better change for the game in creating a more competitive and dynamic clan war atmosphere especially in the TH9-10 brackets. It would certainly end a ton of the constant draws in wars that's commonly seen in the MAX TH10 scene.

/signed
May 29th, 2015
Wrxeter

Well if it is 4 stars... I would rather see the third star award at 85 or 90%

You can snipe perimeter building a lot of times to barely pull off a 75%.

That extra star should be reserved for a near total destruction imo...
May 29th, 2015
Brasen

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wrxeter

Well if it is 4 stars... I would rather see the third star award at 85 or 90%

You can snipe perimeter building a lot of times to barely pull off a 75%.

That extra star should be reserved for a near total destruction imo...

More 2 star attacks remain in the 50%-65/70ish, especially in the MAXED TH10 scene. If you were able to put down a few archers at the end and get that few more percents to hit 75% on a MAX th10 it was because you still executed a fantastic attack beforehand.

If you really would rather do that extra star for the 85-90ish% range you may as well just leave it at the 3 star system at that point. The difference in skill between an 85% and a 100% mostly comes down to the luck/time factor and is pretty minimal.
May 29th, 2015
Nicktheflick

Love it hope it gets implemented because I'm an 80%er myself and 3 is greater than 2
May 30th, 2015
Wrxeter

Brazen that is part of the reason I would like to see 5 stars. 5 stars gives a better spread of how well an attack did.

It's either that, or a draw in star count defaults the winner to be selected off the average destruction stat.
May 30th, 2015
TheForgottenSoul
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skenderbeu

Hello Everybody,

On TH10 bases the gap between getting 2 stars (not too tough) and 3 stars (very difficult, almost impossible) is too wide.
The wars are getting a little bit boring in clans that all players have a townhall lvl10.
Every war it`s the same all attacks look similar trying to get 2 Stars with gowiwi, gowipe and lavaloon. To increase the dynamics i propose a 4 star clan war system.
This is how it works:

1 STAR- (Destroying an opponents Town Hall) /or/ (50% of enemy`s buildings)
2 STAR- (Destroying an opponents Town Hall)+(50% of enemy`s buildings) /or/ (75% of enemy`s buildings)
3 STAR- (Destroying an opponents Town Hall)+(75% of enemy`s buildings)
4 STAR- 100% Annihilation awards full 4 star.

For those who think it's complicated (same calculation, different view):

1 Star: 50% - 74% damage (except TH of course) / (+1 star bonus if TH destroyed)
2 Star: 75% - 99% damage (except TH of course) / (+1 star bonus if TH destroyed)
3 Star: 75% - 99% damage ( + TH of course)
4 Star: 100%

NOTE: The change will be minimal, you get another 1 star when you destroy 75% of enemy`s buildings... easy to implement I guess... since the game already keeps track (and notifies) of 75% destruction in wars'

HAHAHAHAHAH!! Now with the air sweeper it`s like " Forget the 3 Stars". The only way to 3Star a maxed th10 base was with Lava + Balloons and with a high Lvl King & Queen. I have never seen a golem attack to 3 star a Maxed th10 int the last year. I think a 4 star system is more needed than ever now to make the difference.

All comments are welcome, especially constructive criticism!
If you disagree with this idea for any reasons, please explain to me why, thanks!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check also Adelima19 comments where you can find your answers:

It has nothing to do with 1 99% 1 stars or all that other stuff.. that stuff happens yes it will be a 99% 2 star now but we are not talking about that. ya it will still suck you cant change that in the game. the WHOLE point is the jump from 50% with getting the TH to getting a three star 100% is way to big... let me break it down

Right now -
1 Star = 50%. I would say easy to get.
1 Star = TH. I would say a little harder to get depending on base layout.
2 Stars = 50% + TH. I would say Medium + hard depending on base layout, and skill. if you can get 50% of the base you should be able to get the TH fairly easy. they almost go hand and hand.
3 Stars = 100% destroyed... This can be nearly impossible to get.

Now I know your saying 3 Star is not impossible, but I don't mean lvl 8 TH's and below. I"m talking higher lvl Lvl 9, and 10 TH's which is the only reason this I coming up. with lower levels the 4 stars does nothing, as 3 staring a base is easy enough. So you can see above that the jump from 2 to 3 stars is HUGE. from ah not to hard to get, all the way to ya I have a 2% of getting 3 stars. but looking at a 4 star system

4 Stars-
1 Star = 50%. I would say easy to get.
1 Star = TH. I would say a little harder to get depending on base layout.
2 Stars = 50% + TH. I would say Medium + hard depending on base layout, and skill. if you can get 50% of the base you should be able to get the TH fairly easy. they almost go hand and hand.
2 Stars = 75% would be hard to get this without getting the TH but it can happen its like the 99% 1 Stars. if this happens then the attack just didn't go right.
3 Stars = 75% + TH, this would be hard to do, as its easy to get 50% + TH but to get over the 75% destruction can be a challenge.
4 Stars = 100% destroyed... This can be nearly impossible to get.

With this you get a good range through out and more options. with you saying to keep the 3 Star system you are saying a clan getting 50% 2 stars is just as good as the clan getting 99% 2 stars.... basically these clan wars at higher lvls are now becoming 2 star systems as mostly everyone can 2 star but not 3 star bases
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I follow what your saying if you are not meant to 3 Star a lvl 10 TH then these wars of lvl 10 TH are always going to end a Tie because everyone will get 2 Stars, and you missing the point you are jumping from Easy to get 2 Stars to impossible... people will have to "practice to get 3 Stars now, and then practice to get 4 Stars. right now people are saying 2 stars is good enough because 3 stars Is impossible!! and it will still be hard to get 75% and TH. you have to though perfection out the window it don't exist. the main problem I have with the 3 Star system is you see these wars with one clan getting 50-55% 2 stars and the other clan is getting 80% 2 stars... but clearly one clan is better then the other but it is not being shown.
Very convincing. I would like a 4 star Clan war system!
May 30th, 2015
Tamerlanecoc

Don't see the need for it.

Sorry, I just don't see the need for a 4 star system. I don't think it will add anything to the game. The 3 star system we've been using seems perfectly fine to me.
May 30th, 2015
Wrxeter

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tamerlanecoc

Sorry, I just don't see the need for a 4 star system. I don't think it will add anything to the game. The 3 star system we've been using seems perfectly fine to me.

Are you a high level th9 or 10? The problem doesn't really exist in the lower th brackets ad it should be pretty easy to 3 star any base.

But near max th9 and 10 are more difficult to 3 star. The fact that there is no difference in terms or war results when someone 50% 2 stars versus 99% 2 starring is a problem.
June 3rd, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingali

This is idea is good but it can also ruin game environment a bit
Dont take me wrong but it will affect whole game and most clans will be evenly matched!
Good Idea

Thank You!!!
June 3rd, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wrxeter

I agree... but I would rather see 5 stars in war.

1 for TH
1 for 50%
1 for 70%
1 for 90%
1 for 100%

you need only one more star at75% to make the difference. in th9 - th10 its very difficult to get 75%.
June 4th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heitor212

For getting the 75% destruction star, instead input 85%. 75% is too easy to get. Other than that, the idea is great! (Well, only for clan wars, multiplayer is already good as it is).

In th10 vs th10 it`s really difficult to get 50% + th for normal players. Im maxed th10 and i usually get 55% - 65% + th!!!
June 4th, 2015
grim62

I think this is a Great idea, reason is the game needs something to separate a great attack and a good attack. Doing a GoWiPe I can pretty much 2 star any base, its a question if I can 3 star. adding a 4th star changes how I attack a base and which base I chose. Plus people will design bases differently to prevent a 3 star 75% and 4 staring.
June 4th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Totally Agree with this!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brasen

I think the only reason people "want" to see 5 stars is because its a rounded number. Beyond that it really holds no purpose over the 4 star system.

The reason for going from a 3 star to a 4 star system is due to the skill gap difference between a 50% attack to a 100% attack, its gargantuan... as in astronomical especially when talking about MAX TH10 bases. Your essentially rewarding an extra star to a player who did an exceptional attack and nearly wiped out a base versus a player who did an ok-good attack and got the same 2 stars for barely taking out half a base.

Any more stars than that just doesn't hold much value beyond being aesthetically pleasing or "just because". Not to mention the game is already coded to recognize a 75% destruction on a base so it should be easier to implement.

This would be a better change for the game in creating a more competitive and dynamic clan war atmosphere especially in the TH9-10 brackets. It would certainly end a ton of the constant draws in wars that's commonly seen in the MAX TH10 scene.

/signed

Totally agree with this. one of the best comments!
June 4th, 2015
Suad500

Seems pretty legit.

I'm a maxed TH8, so my opinion may not matter at all if i'm agreeing on them adding this. But i like it, I've seen the struggle of getting a 3 star on those max TH9 and TH10. It can be very difficult, adding 1 more star can help take the pressure off in attacking.
June 4th, 2015
p3t3sc0

I'm with you

C'mon supercell, give it a try to this idea ! it goes for improving clan wars experience !

P3t3sc, leader of Terrassa Cracs clan
June 4th, 2015
Dragonlegend

A logical idea....

Supercell should think abt it....I vote yes..
June 4th, 2015
d161tal

I have to vote this down, sorry but Clan Wars match making is not an exact science at this point. Having that large separation between 2 and 3 stars is what gives the underdogs a chance. Generally speaking at TH10 there are strategies for getting a guaranteed 2 stars or trying to get 3 and risk getting only 1 or 0 - again just generally speaking if I'm trying to get a sure 2 stars, I will GoWiPe or some variant of GoWi... If I want to 3 star a TH10, I need to look at balloons or hogs - there are many variants here but they all have something in common - avoiding walls - but they are more susceptible to splash, and therefore more likely to fail. It's this risk/reward that allows an Underdog to take some risks to win.

Again this is generally speaking, so I'm sure some GoWiWi experts can 3 star a max TH10 but I would guess they would have to use a different strategy than just trying to rush the core - this brings in added risk of not getting 2 stars for the payoff of maybe getting 3. If you reduce that risk, then you'll probably see a lot more complaints on match making.
June 4th, 2015
Wrxeter

Regardless of how it's done, or how many are added... I think everyone wants additional stars added.

I still think there should be 5. More star awards = less chance of a war ending in a tie.
June 4th, 2015
MasterApprentice

This idea is pretty nice. I cannot express me or my clanmates' frustration at getting a 2 star ~90%. This would allow for easier achievement of the War Hero Achievements, and make Perfect Wars even more impressive looking.
June 4th, 2015
johnthepan

Im 50-50 on this. I like the idea but there is something I dislike about it. Just can't put my finger on it.
June 5th, 2015
JackAtk

I see where this is coming from, but, personally, do not agree with it. If SC sees that s change like this is necessary, it should be:

1 star = 33%, 2 star = 66%, 3 star = 100%.

This would take away the diving to the TH then putting minions on the outside to get 50% at TH10.
June 5th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wrxeter

Well if it is 4 stars... I would rather see the third star award at 85 or 90%

You can snipe perimeter building a lot of times to barely pull off a 75%.

That extra star should be reserved for a near total destruction imo...

You must be a low lvl to think like that. try to get 75% to maxed th10 with a lvl 40 queen and than we can discuss again.
June 5th, 2015
Sattlerj11

I would love this. For any townnhall

👍 very well thought out
June 5th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Totally Agree with this!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brasen

More 2 star attacks remain in the 50%-65/70ish, especially in the MAXED TH10 scene. If you were able to put down a few archers at the end and get that few more percents to hit 75% on a MAX th10 it was because you still executed a fantastic attack beforehand.

If you really would rather do that extra star for the 85-90ish% range you may as well just leave it at the 3 star system at that point. The difference in skill between an 85% and a 100% mostly comes down to the luck/time factor and is pretty minimal.

Thank you for supporting!
June 5th, 2015
Wrxeter

Again... that's why I say 5 stars instead of 4.

Plenty of times as a near max th9 (heroes still need a lot of work) that you get 90+% 2 stars.

I can't speak to max th10 battles which is why I said 5 stars...

Th 1 star
50%
75%
90%
100%
June 5th, 2015
LachlanS

Very interesting idea... Don't know if I'm in favour or not at the moment. Nicely put together though kudos!
June 6th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicktheflick

Love it hope it gets implemented because I'm an 80%er myself and 3 is greater than 2

Thank you for supporting!
June 6th, 2015
Nickroge

Its a cool idea, but being the veteran player that i am id like to see it stay the same instead of changing after all this time.
June 8th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheForgottenSoul

Very convincing. I would like a 4 star Clan war system!

Thank you for supporting!!
June 8th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tamerlanecoc

Sorry, I just don't see the need for a 4 star system. I don't think it will add anything to the game. The 3 star system we've been using seems perfectly fine to me.

if you read the thread it is explained very well why. if you don`t understand after reading means that you may be a low lvl in a clan with low lvl players and you haven't experienced this
June 9th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Totally Agree with this!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by grim62

I think this is a Great idea, reason is the game needs something to separate a great attack and a good attack. Doing a GoWiPe I can pretty much 2 star any base, its a question if I can 3 star. adding a 4th star changes how I attack a base and which base I chose. Plus people will design bases differently to prevent a 3 star 75% and 4 staring.

Thank You for supporting!!
June 10th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suad500

I'm a maxed TH8, so my opinion may not matter at all if i'm agreeing on them adding this. But i like it, I've seen the struggle of getting a 3 star on those max TH9 and TH10. It can be very difficult, adding 1 more star can help take the pressure off in attacking.

Thank you for supporting!
June 10th, 2015
Antdroid

Good idea....
June 10th, 2015
sanguin

Very good idea now that clan wars become the center of the game ... The step between 2 and 3 stars is too wide !
June 10th, 2015
GODOFDEATH

its a good idea but getting three stars seems better than 4. 4 is just a weird number. 5 would be ok but i would not know how that would be set up. The three star system has been implemented since the start of the game I don't see sc changing it
June 10th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by p3t3sc0

C'mon supercell, give it a try to this idea ! it goes for improving clan wars experience !

P3t3sc, leader of Terrassa Cracs clan

Thank you for supporting!!
June 11th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dragonlegend

Supercell should think abt it....I vote yes..

Thank you for supporting!!
June 11th, 2015
TheProdigy777

I like this!

Great idea!! This would make achieving higher percentages more useful. As of now I take town hall and end right at 50% to save time/hero HP. This would make players want to keep attacking and not end at 50%
June 11th, 2015
reddy4u2

I think it's a pretty good idea, but I don't think there's any way it would be implemented. It would be very helpful in th10 wars, but I think it wouldn't be good for lower level players. It would be a HUGE update, and if supercell is going to make a HUGE update anytime soon, I think we know what that would be..

But all in all I do support it
June 11th, 2015
Kennnnnnn

Why not make it 5 stars? 100 is also divisible by 5, not just 4.

You have my support on 4-star cause. What about 5-star scheme? (25/50/75/100 or 20/40/60/80/100)

Never mind the 5-star thingy. 4 stars is already good as it can hit 50% mark and gain 2 stars.
June 12th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by MasterApprentice

This idea is pretty nice. I cannot express me or my clanmates' frustration at getting a 2 star ~90%. This would allow for easier achievement of the War Hero Achievements, and make Perfect Wars even more impressive looking.

Thank you for supporting!!
June 12th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnthepan

Im 50-50 on this. I like the idea but there is something I dislike about it. Just can't put my finger on it.

What is that you dislike about it?? let`s discuss about that!
June 12th, 2015
JimJams

Great idea

More accurate clan war attack results? Im down.
June 12th, 2015
PvtLeeOwned

Three stars should be extremely hard to get. They shorten the field and allow further attacks to be focused elsewhere. A four star system would dilute the value of stars considerably.

Right now IMO here is what a star means:

1-star attack = failure
2-star attack = tie
3-star attack = win

The key IMO is to get those three star as much as possible on the first attack. The first 75% of a war is full of relatively cheap or easy stars. The key is going to be how many good attacks do you have left in the tank when it comes down to crunch time. A four star system would substantially alter attacking strategy and really devalue the 100% attacks which IMO are the real prize.
June 13th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Disagree with this!

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackAtk

I see where this is coming from, but, personally, do not agree with it. If SC sees that s change like this is necessary, it should be:

1 star = 33%, 2 star = 66%, 3 star = 100%.

This would take away the diving to the TH then putting minions on the outside to get 50% at TH10.

No that changes totally the game. Too easy to win with 33% . I`m proposing smth very minimal.
June 13th, 2015
SimonTheEpic

Major change...not everyones gonna love this if it were to be put into action.
Im going 50/50...really, 4 stars can change a war very easily. not attacking in war will create more trouble because now you can get a max of 8 stars. However, winning more stars in war will increase tension in wars.
June 13th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sattlerj11

👍 very well thought out

Thank you for supporting!
June 13th, 2015
TheRising

This idea is not worth Supercell's time

Supercell should not have to accommodate you because you and your clan mates are incapable of earning 3 stars on a th10 base! There are strategies to 3 star a th10 base, just go on YouTube! This isn't a supercell problem, it's just your problem.
June 13th, 2015
PvtLeeOwned

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheRising

Supercell should not have to accommodate you because you and your clan mates are incapable of earning 3 stars on a th10 base! There are strategies to 3 star a th10 base, just go on YouTube! This isn't a supercell problem, it's just your problem.

Wow, that's nice and personal.
June 13th, 2015
TheForgottenSoul

Such a great idea that will make clan wars much better. Hope Supercell adds this.

(Guys keep viewing and replying to this to make Supercell see this thread to of the shadows)
June 14th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheRising

Supercell should not have to accommodate you because you and your clan mates are incapable of earning 3 stars on a th10 base! There are strategies to 3 star a th10 base, just go on YouTube! This isn't a supercell problem, it's just your problem.

ahahhaahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahhahahah ahahahahahhahahahahahahaahhahahahahaahahhahahhahah aahhahahahah you made me laugh so much!!!!!!!
June 14th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by LachlanS

Very interesting idea... Don't know if I'm in favour or not at the moment. Nicely put together though kudos!

Thank You for you comment!!
June 15th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickroge

Its a cool idea, but being the veteran player that i am id like to see it stay the same instead of changing after all this time.

It doesn`t change anything. But it clearly makes an evidence which clan is better.
June 15th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antdroid

Good idea....

Thank You for supporting!!
June 15th, 2015
0jij0

Very nice idea but i think it requires big and hard works because so much things in the game depends on the 3 star system but i think its better than the 3 stars system because the guy who gets the town hall and 50% of the buildings won't be the same as the guy who gets 99% in the 3min without destroying a builder in the corner thats the best point of it
June 15th, 2015
pixlon

I totally agree. It's so frustrating if you are not better with 90% and 1 star than somebody with 50% 1 star.
June 15th, 2015
michaelgentry271

How many people have to say yes to 4 stars!?

Looks like majority wants 4 stars, as do I.
However I believe 5 stars is is too much also. The forth star for 75%tile would make for more interesting wars period.
The fifth star at 25% and a loot bonus of 400 some odd thousand if your clan wins and you squeeze roof 25% such a low lv vs high lv really isn't earned. You can 25 % a base with a barch or a wiz attack. Easily with no spells I might add.
June 16th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by sanguin

Very good idea now that clan wars become the center of the game ... The step between 2 and 3 stars is too wide !

Thank you for supporting!!
June 17th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheProdigy777

Great idea!! This would make achieving higher percentages more useful. As of now I take town hall and end right at 50% to save time/hero HP. This would make players want to keep attacking and not end at 50%

Thank you for your support!
June 18th, 2015
CheifVait

Skenderbeu i suggest opening a poll to see what majority wants easily. I agree this is an good addition so i just dont get 1 star at 99%...
June 18th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by reddy4u2

I think it's a pretty good idea, but I don't think there's any way it would be implemented. It would be very helpful in th10 wars, but I think it wouldn't be good for lower level players. It would be a HUGE update, and if supercell is going to make a HUGE update anytime soon, I think we know what that would be..

But all in all I do support it

Thank you! It`s the simplest idea to implement. It would be very useful for th9 & th10 but it can also be useful in th8. For lower players if you make the calculations it doesn't change nothing at all.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page