4 STAR SYSTEM!!! CLAN WARS (Increase the game dynamics)

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

March 6th, 2015
Waus

My idea would be more like:

1 star: 25%
2 star: 50%
3 star: 75%
4 star: 100%
+1 star: TH

Only in Clan Wars!
March 6th, 2015
thekingofgoblins

When I first saw the title, I thought it was "4 stars- 100%+all walls"
March 6th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by immortalzrizing

no! no no no no no

Yes but give an argument!
March 6th, 2015
Xnite215

I like the system it is now and so do many others I don't see the point in changing it just makes it more complicated for new players and the younger clashers.
March 6th, 2015
Skenderbeu

I cant agree with this

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xnite215

I like the system it is now and so do many others I don't see the point in changing it just makes it more complicated for new players and the younger clashers.

Adding one star when you each 75% is complicated!!! Where do you see the complication in that?!
March 6th, 2015
Xnite215

There's no point in changing it. It's perfect the way it is in my eyes.
March 6th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xnite215

There's no point in changing it. It's perfect the way it is in my eyes.

You should give an counter argument. Saying its ok in your eyes it not constructive!
March 6th, 2015
Cile

Thats little op

Th10 is alredy high level and like whit GoWiPe some bases cant even raided 1 star or 2 stars..its hard to destroy max th10 3 star.. and if add 4 stars that would be very hard because most of GoWiPe attacks are 50%% and th..
March 6th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waus

My idea would be more like:

1 star: 25%
2 star: 50%
3 star: 75%
4 star: 100%
+1 star: TH

Only in Clan Wars!

look at previous response to same ideas. in my opinion only a system as presented in the thread can be implemented. a 25% 1 star would ruin the game because everybody could win a loot
March 6th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cile

Th10 is alredy high level and like whit GoWiPe some bases cant even raided 1 star or 2 stars..its hard to destroy max th10 3 star.. and if add 4 stars that would be very hard because most of GoWiPe attacks are 50%% and th..

the purpose of a 4 star system is to make a difference of 50%+th to attacks more than 75%+th.
March 7th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by thekingofgoblins

When I first saw the title, I thought it was "4 stars- 100%+all walls"

Did you read the thread?
March 7th, 2015
thekingofgoblins

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skenderbeu

Did you read the thread?

Yes, having more stars per base requires more skill and make the war more playable.
March 7th, 2015
carruiz25

I would like to ask, how can you get a 100% if you don't destroy the town hall?
March 7th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by thekingofgoblins

Yes, having more stars per base requires more skill and make the war more playable.

I don`t know how you did that math! To destroy a base requires the same skill regardless of how many stars you get. If they add 100 stars one per each % you still have the same difficulty in destroying a base. Adding a star at 75% will only make the difference between those attacks who get 2 stars by 50%+th and those who get more than 75%. Read previous comments please!
March 7th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by carruiz25

I would like to ask, how can you get a 100% if you don't destroy the town hall?

Where did you saw that!
March 7th, 2015
carruiz25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skenderbeu

Where did you saw that!

Above in your post. "3 stars-100% damage (except town hall of course)"
March 7th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by carruiz25

Above in your post. "3 stars-100% damage (except town hall of course)"

You are right! it was a bit misleading. I corrected it , thank you!
March 7th, 2015
WarriorRudy

But in this case, the Clan Perk system has to be re-modeled.
March 7th, 2015
carruiz25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skenderbeu

You are right! it was a bit misleading. I corrected it , thank you!

Just got a little confused about that. So far, the idea is good but i think it would be hard to intergrate into the clan war system since it is also the same as normal multiplayer battles.
March 9th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by carruiz25

Just got a little confused about that. So far, the idea is good but i think it would be hard to intergrate into the clan war system since it is also the same as normal multiplayer battles.

I think the implementation would be very simple.
March 11th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Comments please:thumbsup:!
March 11th, 2015
Noooneh

Support this

This idea should be supported for sure, it has its pros and cons for every ody, but it's more fair and accurate above all
March 13th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noooneh

This idea should be supported for sure, it has its pros and cons for every ody, but it's more fair and accurate above all

Thank You!
March 14th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Thanks everybody. Continue to support!
March 14th, 2015
PepsiKing123

This is\nt necessary becase it doesnt change anything at all. It's like real world situation. If i just printed money, and added it to what i already have, altogether it would still be the same as before because of inflation, or in smaller terms, money cant appear from no where, putting more in decreases the value of everything. So, putting more stars in just decreases the value of one star eg. less trophies. There's no point in doing this it's literally useless.
March 14th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by PepsiKing123

This is\nt necessary becase it doesnt change anything at all. It's like real world situation. If i just printed money, and added it to what i already have, altogether it would still be the same as before because of inflation, or in smaller terms, money cant appear from no where, putting more in decreases the value of everything. So, putting more stars in just decreases the value of one star eg. less trophies. There's no point in doing this it's literally useless.

I dont know how you did that math. There are responses to your comment so just look back and you can see how it change the calculation. There is also an example!
March 14th, 2015
MehulJ

1 Attachment(s)

Agreed but lets make it 5 *****

Yea 4 Star sounds great but everyone uses 5 stars like 5 star hotel or 5 star movie, so 5 stars would really be a way to settle attacks. i say like 35% for 1, 60% for 2, 85% for 3, town hall for 4, and then 100% for the final star!

SUPERCELL PLEASE LOOK AT THIS! THIS MAKES A LOT OF SENSE; MORE SENSE THAN ALOTA♥♥♥INA IN AUSTIN POWERS!Attachment 99975 (lol stupid movie! but very funny though)
March 14th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by MehulJ

Yea 4 Star sounds great but everyone uses 5 stars like 5 star hotel or 5 star movie, so 5 stars would really be a way to settle attacks. i say like 35% for 1, 60% for 2, 85% for 3, town hall for 4, and then 100% for the final star!

SUPERCELL PLEASE LOOK AT THIS! THIS MAKES A LOT OF SENSE; MORE SENSE THAN ALOTA♥♥♥INA IN AUSTIN POWERS!Attachment 99975 (lol stupid movie! but very funny though)

4 is perfect!
March 14th, 2015
MehulJ

i still believe in 5 stars!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skenderbeu

4 is perfect!

i still find 5 stars to be a good option!
my opinion , i respect yours too! :)
March 15th, 2015
Hound1616

Good idea

Good idea would it be for every townhall? I would like it more if it was just to be for th10's but that would be a lot harder to implement. On the subject for great ideas I would love to see supercell introduce the pause button for the boost who has 2hrs free all the time i would boost a whole lot more!!
March 15th, 2015
JHBaker

Good Idea!

I think it's a good idea. I can see where you are comming from, and many Clan wars have ended in disaster because of a perculiar star system and I think this woul dbe a much more honnest way of doing it. Maybe only for Wars but I don't know. Good job though!
March 16th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by MehulJ

i still find 5 stars to be a good option!
my opinion , i respect yours too! :)

if you want a 5 star system with 25% victory i dont think thats a good idea.
March 16th, 2015
wolpak

The problem with a 4 or 5 star system is that it lowers the value of getting to the TH. Before, you could 98% and only 1 star. Here, you could get 2 or even 3 stars, which significantly lowers the value the TH gives.

I am not saying I don't like it, I am saying it isn't just an extra star thing. It changes the dynamics quite a lot.
March 16th, 2015
rwelshjr

I think they may be heading that way anyhow. They are first working to make 3 stars very hard and that makes sense as a first step. 3 stars used to be too common and if everyone was getting 3 then everyone would just be getting 4 or 5 so what would be the point?

In order to have room for increasing the number of stars they have to first increase the amount of separation between 1, 2, and 3 star attacks and that has certainly been happening. (especially between 2 and 3)
March 16th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by rwelshjr

I think they may be heading that way anyhow. They are first working to make 3 stars very hard and that makes sense as a first step. 3 stars used to be too common and if everyone was getting 3 then everyone would just be getting 4 or 5 so what would be the point?

In order to have room for increasing the number of stars they have to first increase the amount of separation between 1, 2, and 3 star attacks and that has certainly been happening. (especially between 2 and 3)

i have explained very well all the points. may i ask what th are you and what th lvls is your clan mainly composed. My clan attack with lava-loons and all players are very good (most of attacks +75% or 100%) at war but with some good th10 bases we have the issue that is impossible to get 3stars especially when we fight with a stronger clan. However the difference in strength is not shown in the number of stars because we get 2stars and the other clan gets 2stars too. if we had a 4 star system the war results would be different and for all clans the attacks of a barely 50% +th that is really very simple ( i can get it with non specialized troops ) would not be good but normal.
March 16th, 2015
Tpjones

I dislike the idea, the game dynamics are fine as they are, no need to change them in my opinion
March 16th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by wolpak

The problem with a 4 or 5 star system is that it lowers the value of getting to the TH. Before, you could 98% and only 1 star. Here, you could get 2 or even 3 stars, which significantly lowers the value the TH gives.

I am not saying I don't like it, I am saying it isn't just an extra star thing. It changes the dynamics quite a lot.

thats the point! It should be a difference from an attack of 90% + the with an attack of 50% +th...
March 17th, 2015
MehulJ

25% need not be a victory

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skenderbeu

if you want a 5 star system with 25% victory i dont think thats a good idea.

We can keep conditions of whether win or loss...
for example 60% gives you two stars! hence that is considered as a win but 35% gives only one star but considered a fail. for a victory two conditions must be satisfied...
1) atleast two stars
2)minimum 50% damage(this will ensure that town hall snipe wont be considered a win)

and by the way let the second star be at 60% and the third at 85%, the fourth can be th town hall and the fifth at 100%, this will be good!
March 17th, 2015
itmustbeaustin

How about keep the 3 star system, except for wars have one star awarded for TH and the other two star awarded as partial stars, from .02 to 2.00, ie. 25% = .50 stars. 77% = 1.54 stars. 99% = 1.98 stars.
March 17th, 2015
zerone6898

lol..what deep stupido arrogant u..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikrojr

I am reading about this proposal to change the STAR system and I believe it's a BAD idea!

Why?
1. Adding more STAR's decreases the separation between a PERFECT ATTACK (100%) and a "not Perfect attack".
2. Getting a 3 STAR is a challenge, and it should be rewarded appropriately. (ie. much more!)
3. In our clan, NOT getting a 3 STAR is considered a "failed" attack.
4. Why should a clan, who can't do 3 STAR attacks, be given a greater opportunity to earn stars with "failed" attacks?
5. The current system encourages excellence, a revamped system, with more STAR's, would encourage mediocrity.

Bottom line, the current system is good, and doesn't need to be changed.

Thanks,

Mikro jr

Btw, if you want to join our clan, look us up ... Top Chiefs (#9UPR2QG9)

easy to said boy..u just a th8 only..i just go to your stupid clan..i see your id..u know what? same on what i assume..u are just low th8...please read people thread carefully..dont just read title only..u just let everybody know how stupid u are...please keep away your stupid brain and dont spam there..here..over there..
for your information..th8 easy to get 3* when u in war..almost every attack..
but in th10..almost impossible to 3*,,for max th10..do u understand that fact?
u must fell u always do perfect attack when u get 3* in th8..hahaha..aiyoooo nak gelak aku
March 17th, 2015
Java9

great idea
March 17th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by zerone6898

easy to said boy..u just a th8 only..i just go to your stupid clan..i see your id..u know what? same on what i assume..u are just low th8...please read people thread carefully..dont just read title only..u just let everybody know how stupid u are...please keep away your stupid brain and dont spam there..here..over there..
for your information..th8 easy to get 3* when u in war..almost every attack..
but in th10..almost impossible to 3*,,for max th10..do u understand that fact?
u must fell u always do perfect attack when u get 3* in th8..hahaha..aiyoooo nak gelak aku

Hahhahaha, well said.. im not very good at English because i would have wanted to say the same too... i agree in every word.
March 17th, 2015
SIZ

Was just going to post this....

I just came on here to suggest this exact thing. Love this idea!
March 17th, 2015
kej

This is a good idea because I admit it, a 99% 1 star give-all-you-got is frustrating.
But for my opinion, there is a reason why 3 stars is currently implemented.

Getting a 99% one star means either the opponent has good defense or big luck. There are base that are very good at concealing their TH even if it cost the whole base which is nice specially during the Clan war.
March 17th, 2015
rwelshjr

Funny, I just had a 99% one star I ran out of time. I need to work on my efficiency. (I was even just lecturing someone they needed to earlier today so this is ironic to eat my own words like that)

My sense is that SC is working that direction. They are making 3 stars harder and harder and as that happens the gap between 2 and three is starting to grow quite a bit. The need to create that separation to have room for the new scores to have a point. If a lot of guys were all getting 3 stars anyhow it would not matter so I think that gap they are creating is going to serve a purpose..
March 19th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by rwelshjr

Funny, I just had a 99% one star I ran out of time. I need to work on my efficiency. (I was even just lecturing someone they needed to earlier today so this is ironic to eat my own words like that)

My sense is that SC is working that direction. They are making 3 stars harder and harder and as that happens the gap between 2 and three is starting to grow quite a bit. The need to create that separation to have room for the new scores to have a point. If a lot of guys were all getting 3 stars anyhow it would not matter so I think that gap they are creating is going to serve a purpose..

They can increase the gap between 3 to 4 stars (75% - 100%).there should be a difference from 50% to 75% too.
March 19th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by kej

This is a good idea because I admit it, a 99% 1 star give-all-you-got is frustrating.
But for my opinion, there is a reason why 3 stars is currently implemented.

Getting a 99% one star means either the opponent has good defense or big luck. There are base that are very good at concealing their TH even if it cost the whole base which is nice specially during the Clan war.

Thank You although the point is a bit different
March 20th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by SIZ

I just came on here to suggest this exact thing. Love this idea!

Was your idea exactly the same or different?
March 20th, 2015
GameSketcher

Nice idea! I'll be happy to see this in CW
March 20th, 2015
mido2malik

I like it but only for clan wars.
March 20th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by GameSketcher

Nice idea! I'll be happy to see this in CW

Thank you!
March 20th, 2015
KingDao

Important Factors

Before I say "Yea" or "Nay", can you please tell me if this change would be for all raiding, or in Clan Wars only. Keep in mind that re-balancing for a fourth star means that loot and trophies per star will need re-balancing as well before you answer.

~KingDao
March 20th, 2015
andrgin

1.) The requirements for the league bonus are not changed. You still get it after 50% or getting the th. Also there is no requirement to award more trophies for the 3rd star.

2.) I dont like the idea very much because it places too much focus on protecting your builders huts and army camps. Not getting to the th means you did not get into the core which is your primary target. Getting 75% in a dragon attack without the th should not give you as much stars as getting the th but only 50%.
In many cases it would be better going around the base for 75% for 2 stars than taking the jump spell to the core, dealing with the infernos, smashing the th and then dying inside after 40% because every defense building hits on you.

Also 75% means nothing. You can get th and 75% with inferno and xbows left and you can fail a gowiloon attack at 49% at the last air defense inside which would give you a 3 star otherwise.

If there is an additional star it should be for all defenses destroyed.
March 20th, 2015
ClashingSam

Extra star for nothing? LOL.. changes nothing.
March 21st, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingDao

Before I say "Yea" or "Nay", can you please tell me if this change would be for all raiding, or in Clan Wars only. Keep in mind that re-balancing for a fourth star means that loot and trophies per star will need re-balancing as well before you answer.

~KingDao

that`s up to supercell. I can say that it can be implemented very easily in both but the main issue is CW where the war attack target only a 50%+th , 2 stars.
March 21st, 2015
Skenderbeu

How did you do that math!! lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClashingSam

Extra star for nothing? LOL.. changes nothing.

read the thread. search the comments there is a lot of material that could help you understand...
March 22nd, 2015
Seuss145

Did I respond to this or was it another thread? Whatever, bump. Just remembered about seeing this after I got 98% 2 star in war on a th9 a little higher than me. Man that sucked.
March 23rd, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seuss145

Did I respond to this or was it another thread? Whatever, bump. Just remembered about seeing this after I got 98% 2 star in war on a th9 a little higher than me. Man that sucked.

Dont know. However thats not only about that.
March 23rd, 2015
JHBaker

Brilliant idea!

I fully support this idea. It just seems to work better and give a more honnest reward and is basically better in every way I can think of! :D
March 23rd, 2015
jake3323
I like the concept of this idea, but I would rather see it changed to a 5 star system as I think the Town hall is more important than killing random buildings. So I think getting 50% should be less worthy than killing the TH.
- 2 Stars - Killing the TH
- 1 Star - 50%
- 1 Star - 75%
- 1 Star - 100%
March 23rd, 2015
UnknownShadows

I think this would be good, however maybe more structures should be added. Overall, great idea!
March 23rd, 2015
Skenderbeu
Quote:
Originally Posted by jake3323

I like the concept of this idea, but I would rather see it changed to a 5 star system as I think the Town hall is more important than killing random buildings. So I think getting 50% should be less worthy than killing the TH.

2 Stars - Killing the TH
1 Star - 50%
1 Star - 75%
1 Star - 100%
In this scenario there is not much change. battles that now finish in 2 stars will finish with 3 stars. Its very easy to gel th+50%. If the 3rd star is awarded at 75% is very difficult and it separate normal attacks with good attacks
March 24th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by JHBaker

I fully support this idea. It just seems to work better and give a more honnest reward and is basically better in every way I can think of! :D

Thank you!
March 24th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by UnknownShadows

I think this would be good, however maybe more structures should be added. Overall, great idea!

Thank You!!
March 25th, 2015
boss1986

just checking

i like very much this thread
March 25th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by boss1986

i like very much this thread

Thank You for your support. Your always welcome
March 26th, 2015
boss1986

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skenderbeu

Thank You for your support. Your always welcome

You have always my support for this thread!
April 1st, 2015
BlackShadowALB

Nice Idea

Hey Skendoo. I didn't know you are an active forum member. leave the forum we are pushing for top 100 hahah
April 2nd, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackShadowALB

Hey Skendoo. I didn't know you are an active forum member. leave the forum we are pushing for top 100 hahah

Thank you Blackyy!
April 11th, 2015
BlackShadowALB

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClashingSam

Extra star for nothing? LOL.. changes nothing.

It change a lot. if you read the thread it`s explained how.
April 11th, 2015
Ack94

I think it is a good idea because it is unbearable to see 99% 1 star and 50% 2 star or worse see clan war won by one point, with a 3 star and the rest 2 stars. If supercell would change the number of stars, the clan wars would improve.
April 11th, 2015
MattTheSurviver

I like the idea

I love the idea of the 4 star system. I have recently been in a war, and in my first attack I have gotten 91%, running out of time (with HoGowiwi) with the TH, and felt that it should have been a 3 star in the 4 star system. I hope that the idea of the 4 star system in the war will be implemented by Supercell- I care about the strategy in war and not one of those who attacks for 50% 2 stars - too easy. You have my support of this idea. :D
April 13th, 2015
FlamingLightning

Yeah...

Once i've seen a raid with the th having 1 health left and still being a 99% 1 star raid
also, even though I'm a town hall 8, I have tried to attack a nearly maxed th 8 and fail with 0 star... maybe if I used a better tactic i could of got 2 stars but definitely not 3 stars. In the 4 star system, I could maybe have got 3 stars
April 13th, 2015
Mikmac76

4 stars Great Idea

I really like this idea. I have noticed things are falling into a steady pattern. Its time for a slight shakeup.
April 14th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackShadowALB

It change a lot. if you read the thread it`s explained how.

Thank you! for supporting
April 14th, 2015
yellarfever

Awesome!

I think his is a great idea. The game is slowly getting boring for TH10. 4 stars would make a difference.
April 15th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ack94

I think it is a good idea because it is unbearable to see 99% 1 star and 50% 2 star or worse see clan war won by one point, with a 3 star and the rest 2 stars. If supercell would change the number of stars, the clan wars would improve.

Thank You for the support!
April 15th, 2015
Retell

I like it

I like it .cool
April 15th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattTheSurviver

I love the idea of the 4 star system. I have recently been in a war, and in my first attack I have gotten 91%, running out of time (with HoGowiwi) with the TH, and felt that it should have been a 3 star in the 4 star system. I hope that the idea of the 4 star system in the war will be implemented by Supercell- I care about the strategy in war and not one of those who attacks for 50% 2 stars - too easy. You have my support of this idea. :D

Thank You for your support
April 15th, 2015
destroyer14

I like this idea supercell should add this even tho they probably wont
April 15th, 2015
Hawk25

But how would an ongoing war be affected by this change?
April 16th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawk25

But how would an ongoing war be affected by this change?

Sorry i don`t understand?
April 16th, 2015
Hawk25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skenderbeu

Sorry i don`t understand?

Like how would a war that is in the middle of war be affected by this system.
April 16th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawk25

Like how would a war that is in the middle of war be affected by this system.

I suppose that taking effect immediately after a maintenance break would not compromise the war. All the stars will be recounted in the new system. For example you can take the ongoing wars, when supercell doubled the EXP points the effect took place immediately by doubling EXP. In this case will be the same the amount of stars will be recounted and the war would end with the new system. It wont penalize any of the clans
April 16th, 2015
Hawk25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skenderbeu

I suppose that taking effect immediately after a maintenance break would not compromise the war. All the stars will be recounted in the new system. For example you can take the ongoing wars, when supercell doubled the EXP points the effect took place immediately by doubling EXP. In this case will be the same the amount of stars will be recounted and the war would end with the new system. It wont penalize any of the clans

Ok, Thanks.
April 16th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawk25

Ok, Thanks.

nothing. thank you
April 17th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlamingLightning

Once i've seen a raid with the th having 1 health left and still being a 99% 1 star raid
also, even though I'm a town hall 8, I have tried to attack a nearly maxed th 8 and fail with 0 star... maybe if I used a better tactic i could of got 2 stars but definitely not 3 stars. In the 4 star system, I could maybe have got 3 stars

Thank you for your support!
April 17th, 2015
Ectar

the fact is getting the town hall is one star, 50 percent is another and 100 percent is three, but people forget that you can get 98percent and just one star, your idea is not terrible, but it just doesnt fit with the system, i think there should be a bonus for three star tho, but i can't see a way it can be implemented fairly
April 18th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ectar

the fact is getting the town hall is one star, 50 percent is another and 100 percent is three, but people forget that you can get 98percent and just one star, your idea is not terrible, but it just doesnt fit with the system, i think there should be a bonus for three star tho, but i can't see a way it can be implemented fairly

Sorry didn't understand the point!
April 18th, 2015
merterkan

/signed
I get %86 percent but ı have 1 star its bad:/
April 18th, 2015
Chwim

agree

although it would be more balenced with a 5 star system and also probably easyer to implement
April 18th, 2015
MayurGarg

An Idea Of Change

Instead of Star at 50% and 75% destruction...
we can have stars at 33% and 66% destruction..!!
or at 40% and 70% destruction..!!
Just equally space them..!! :smirk:
April 18th, 2015
k2aries

Yesssss

LOVE this idea. For many reasons, most of which are already stated in this feed. But I also think this might mitigate some of the issues clans face with poor war matchups.
April 18th, 2015
Chinatown13

I like this idea :) will it mean you get less trophies if you snipe the town hall?
April 19th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikmac76

I really like this idea. I have noticed things are falling into a steady pattern. Its time for a slight shakeup.

Thank You!
April 19th, 2015
Spurs978

Idk about having this outside of wars
April 19th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spurs978

Idk about having this outside of wars

it can be implemented also in normal attacks too.
April 20th, 2015
Skenderbeu

Quote:

Originally Posted by yellarfever

I think his is a great idea. The game is slowly getting boring for TH10. 4 stars would make a difference.

Thank you!!
April 20th, 2015
ReverseNL

Great idea!

I see a lot of people missing the point here, but I absolutely agree with your idea. We also experience the problem that it is almost impossible to get 3 stars at th10 which ends up in a draw basically every war, because people do not have any problem with getting 2 stars at th10. Therefore, your idea is a great improvement for the clanwars at high level th's.

I also see people mentioning idea's like introducing a 4th star at 33% or below. Now that is exactly what we do not need. We need a gap closer between 50% and 100% for people who are skilled, but can not improve since there are bases that are impossible to 3 star. If you end up having 49% or lower you just need to practice a little more.

I really hope supercell will have a look at this!
April 20th, 2015
Robatomwarriors

I agree. 75% clear should get a little more credit. Collectors and town hall ranks the same as everything except a builder hut. It is very anoying when good players miss out on recognition in war. Nothing worse with 30 seconds to go and 2 buildings left with the troops all bashing away at walls..

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 AM.