Printable View
Don't like this idea for the fact it will make unbalanced wars even harder.
For example, current war our team 1 TH11, enemy has 2 (max), they have 3 starred our top TH10 (no. 2) down, and likely for us to get 1-2 on TH11's, so it's hard enough as it is without throwing extra stars in the mix.
Really amazing Idea
It will differentiate between a skilled attack and a 50% 2 star. Especially in higher townhalls.
Its very good idea, war will be more interesting when u will implement 1 more star ;) But only for th11 - lower th's - easier to make to 100% should be less important than top.
Sorry. I don't really care for this idea. Seems to complicate things too much. I like the Total Destruction percentage that SC implented as a tiebreaker. And I believe that is good enough to decide a winner!
I concur with the OP. However keeping the total destruction in tack it's in itself the best thing they've done to improve wars, too. But why not improve them yet one step further? Is it not time? Is the spot light to bright on Royale still to shine some love back to the good ol' clash universes?
I feel, however that the 4 th star should be at 90% destruction. And war itself be reworked and it's own system apart from regular raids. Truth be told.
The TH ,or Heart, grants one star that We'd keep.( of course) But a two star would be 30% and destruction and the TH or 50% destruction. A three star would be 70% destruction and TH destruction or 90% destruction. And the 4 star be total destruction.
I feel this version of war would allow the absolute most for every Defensive layout type and attack minded person to mix.
I myself don't plan for "3*" attacks hardly ever actually. I base my strategy on % and two stars. But thats just me.
I do however agree with OPs idea on 4* wars as well. I am on the side of "this change to the dynamics of war can't be worse than it is.... " And if you think so.
Drop more input. Please. If thats what we're talking about here. Right?
bump cuz I really like this
Well they've fixed this.. they done it by percentage
Work to get the most percent you can - don't go for safe 2 stars go all out and get the most percent you can - so stars don't really matter / beside of course the stars being the main focus / but do you get what I mean?
A 2 star with 67% will lose to a 2 star with 78%
So it doesn't matter if that 78%(with TH) gets the 3rd star
But a 50% + TH gets a 2 star but that equals 75% without TH? It's a little unfair on the 50% 2 star I believe
So TH + 90% would be 4 stars? That's stupid because you're receiving the full 4 stars for only 90% damageQuote:
Originally Posted by michaelgentry271
Plus reworking clan wars would be way too much work
I feel the idea put up is fine as is - doesn't need anything too complicated
possible solution on engineered clans - what's your opinion about this?
about the 4star system what if we apply it like this, A player can get a 4star instead of 3s if a player attack and perfectly destroy a townhall higher than his current level.
sample scenario 1:
th9 vs th10/th11 (good/rush/engineered) will get a 4star if he was able to destroy it.
And a 3star for a townhall equal or below his level.
sample scenario 2:
in a 5 vs 5 match game.
A team is 5 th9 and B team is 5 th11 engineered acct.
A team can get a total of 20 war star while B team can only have 15.
I believe this will stop the players from engineering their acct due to war stars.
This will also encourage the lower lvl players to challenge townhall higher than them.
- th7 vs th8, th8 vs th9, th9 vs th10, etc.
War games will become competitive again.
It think this is a nice idea.