Printable View
This is the stupidest thing I've ever read.
There don't need to be more 'ranks' in clans. If you promote people so often and ranks require so little trust that you need to add 5 more, you shouldn't lead a clan. This makes me want to throw up then kick a dog.
Thanks!
obviously you don't visit ideas and future requests much. personly i think that there should be five ranks
: leader, vice leader (great idea), captain, elder and member
As much as I think three vice leaders is a good idea, I think by far the most important is the development of the "New member" rank, like a member but can't see war map traps, CC troops, or HTs.Quote:
Originally Posted by UltimateApple
Excellent idea Jrap21
This is what active clans need more ranks
I suggested a similar idea but most of the people were against it ..
I can only see this as a positive change in the Game..
I like the idea how you put only 3 positions for Vice leader and 10 positions for captain...
Also maybee the Leader can restrict players from certain things like starting clan wars or similar...
Let try and get this to Supercell To implement it asap...
Great post
You have my Vote..
Thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by Darksol
If you don't like it can we at least be a little nice about it??? Also, I didn't add 5 more ranks. Maybe you should focus on your reading comprehension because I see that its a bit low.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fupo
Thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dar121
Anyone caught being mean to dogs is in line for trouble.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fupo
Personally I don't think we need more ranks. I think new members should have to work hard to become Elder and then build up trust to become Co-Leader. Both are positions of responsibility and neither should be given lightly.
Good ideas but I don't think new ranks is need. I would like to see the leader have the ability to adjust the privileges for each rank. example: Enable/Disable to accept or kick members ect....I am sure you all get the idea.
Hi jrap21, truly a good idea. I might have something to add in. Leader can choose the recipient for the clan mail. Main purpose is..sometimes there's information that leader only want to share with his/her co-leaders. Thats all i think. Thanks for your consideration :)
Thanks for posting on here Stitch! I understand what you are saying. However, I think when you have alot of people in your clan and 15 loyal members, you don't want to give everyone co leader, but you still want them to be a part of the clan. Thats why I made the vice-leader position. It is just balances the roles a bit more. Im NOT making this for the people who give out roles willy nilly. The vice-leader position will help when leaders are on vacation or not present. I just think that it is wierd how roles go from 1 leader to x amount of co leaders. That just doesn't make sense. Adding a role in between leader and co leader will make the leadership roles more balanced. I also added limits so that people can not give out ranks willy nilly anymore. The vice leader and limits will make clans more structured. Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stitch
Thanks! Personally, I don't think SC will do that because they did not want a leader and co leader only chat.Quote:
Originally Posted by striker125
personally i think that each position is great, but they should be called something else, like instead of vice-leader it should have a name more relevant to the content of the game then something democratic, like it could be 1st Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant and 3rd Lieutenant(b/c you said there would only be three in this place and the longest one in this position would obtian 1st then 2nd then 3rd). And then instead of elder it could be called Sergeant, then with the newbies to the clan they could be called Recruits, then after that one week is up they are called Private(Even though the name changes that member still gains no 'power' in the clan). The reason why I say it should be changed to these is so that it follows the relevant ranks of an actual real-life Army. I agree with everything else though that you said. And I love the Idea.
Im open to name changes. Your names are decent.Quote:
Originally Posted by NIC21
Please give clan leaders the ability to edit war troops donated to other/all clan members' war bases. Sometimes people or new people make a mistake or donate the wrong troops in to war castles. Sometimes newer members request farm troops for war and others fill the castles with poor fighters or weak troops. It take a very long time to get people back on line to dump troops especially in international clans.
The clan leader should have the ability to edit war troops in all of his clans war castles. This way the leader can upgrade troops or substitute 5 L3 wizards for a L4 dragon if he sees fit. Many times, the clan leader has the best troops and can upgrade a L2 Valkyrie, dragon, or wizard with a higher level troops more suited for a war... and more resistant to poison spells!
Thanks for your consideration!
Grogg
Unholy Horde
Yeah thats impliedQuote:
Originally Posted by OGGrogg
Just my thoughts on a few things! :D
The names of the positions should be something that everyone can understand. Perhaps leader and co-leader can stay, but there could be an additional name that fits the time period of the game. The easiest way is to re-work the permissions and add a loyalty-based promotion.
For example:
leader
co-leader
elder
*Loyal member*
Member
*new member.
The loyal members are not promoted, they are earned through participating in enough wars, donating troops, and staying in the clan. If they go inactive, they are automatically made a member again (to avoid clans full of "loyal" members). Another way to do this is to add a Star next to a position if they stay active. It's basically something for new people to see and not too difficult to earn.
Maybe loyal members can recruit, donate, etc similar to an elder. They could kick *new members, but not regular members.
btw, it would help to add what the leadership positions can currently do so others who aren't in those positions can see why it would help :)
I love the idea of more ranks. If anything I'd like more than you listed. To inspire loyalty I'd even have the bottom 3 ranks earned by default in the game. Donating, Time in clan and battles won.
We definitely need new rolesQuote:
Originally Posted by BattleBorn007
Which is exactly whats needed for when your leader is inactiveQuote:
Originally Posted by Jrap21
This is a very good idea, but better discussed in another thread (edit to put it here when I find it). While many agree, there is currently focused debate on whether it should be an ability of the "leader" or the "leaders". I for example, argue for the singular, because doing this should be rare, bad war CC donations assumes clan dysfunction, and as interference in a members base could easily cause offence, it is far safer to ensure that if it happens the member knows exactly who did it, that it was the leader, and that if you don't like the leader there is exactly one thing for you to do, which is to leave. If the member doesn't know who did a stupid thing, well that's just bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by OGGrogg
There merits of giving a leader the ability to remove CC troops from the war map is actually quite independent of the benefits of the limited number new upper rank, and the development of the rank of "new member".
While I am considering new names, I am not sure if this would be the way to do things. Because if I added that it would defeat the whole purpose of my thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by XFireStormX
No ranks can be earned by default. Leader buys clan, leader recruits people which makes the leader have full control of their clan.Quote:
Originally Posted by BattleQueen18
Thanks! #MakeCOCGreatAgain #WeWantNewRolesQuote:
Originally Posted by Omegablackheart
#WeWantNewRolesQuote:
Originally Posted by Omegablackheart
I agree, well said!Quote:
Originally Posted by George1971
I would love for there to be a specific description for each role that way when someone wants promoted or a leader wants to promote said person knows exactly what's expected of them. And hiding stuff from Spies excellent idea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jrap21
Captain has too much power. Remove the captain role
I like that new members cant see traps, this would help defend against spies
There are a ton of posts on this thread, so sorry if this has already been suggested
Clan Friend: allows the social butterflies to help support friends in multiple clans.
- can join and leave without losing designation
- does not require a confirmation to join the clan
- automatically assigned upon elder and/or co voluntarily leaving.
This is what some of us call "whitelisting". Whitelisting with rank, so that you can leave and return and resume your rank automatically is a reasonable feature.Quote:
Originally Posted by McGregorY
We are often a closed clan, mostly because of excessive requests to join. I would like to use whitelisting to allow inactive players who left due to inactivity to rejoin.
Ranks. 1. Chief 2. Captain 3. Lieutenant 4. Sgt. At arms 5. Elder 6. Member
Not sure who would get what perks of the ranks but that's what it should be. Two captains. 3 lieutenants and four sergeants. Anyone can be an elder and anyone can be a member
Leader(s) should be able to edit War castle troops inorder to get rid of wrong donation in war Castle.
Only 3 persons can be kick by vice leader?
No thanks!
Bad Idea!
Hello!
In our clan leader almost appears . The former leader office transferred completely non-playing player. Contact with current head is not possible .
I propose to make a choice by voting the leader of the clan by vice leaders and captains of the clan.
Waiting for your reply.
Thats exactly what I have...Quote:
Originally Posted by Lilkricket24
No I'm just not gonna remove it! That would defeat the whole purpose of my thread!Quote:
Originally Posted by prosper12
Thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by mattbirdsong324
Yeah thats an interesting idea! I think that someone else has a thread on Feeder Clans. I think that you should comment on there too!Quote:
Originally Posted by McGregorY
No that wouldn't work.Quote:
Originally Posted by Odoylerules2247
Yeah thats good.Quote:
Originally Posted by apk740
Can you read? Did you ever learn to read? Did you skip over my thread just to comment? You need practice on your reading comprehension! Here are some worksheets for you!! http://www.k5learning.com/reading-co...ion-worksheetsQuote:
Originally Posted by iMiszczFUN
Have fun!!!
The leader made the clan. The leader recruited members to the clan. It will always be the leaders clan unless he gives up leadership.Quote:
Originally Posted by Argyn8787
Guys lets try to hit 200s yes votes by 2016!!
I like these ideas - especially the anti spies and the fact that you can only have a specific amount of *elders* (for egs)
The only thing I would tweak is that you can take out of others donation box - get rid of this idea and I think this thread is pretty much perfect ;)
I do love the idea of adding limited vice leader positions who have the ability to remove rampaging, tantrum throwing, or trolling co-leaders: someone who holds the same level of authority as the leader (apart from kicking the leader or other vice leader, or promoting vice... only the leader should get to choose those roles), because we cannot be on 24/7. I am also not opposed to the vice leader position instead being a limited number of co-leaders and changing the current membership roles names to co-leader (limited), elder, senior, member. In either case there is still a "new" limited helper position.
Also, I saw several people mention the idea of cool down times... I thought maybe that could be viable if adding the new rank is not. Make it so after say 3-5 kicks a co-leader makes he has a cool down time of several hours. That could stop trolls or irate co's from decimating entire clans within seconds.
Thanks for your thread and ideas!!
I created a poll using your vice information, and title role information also posted in this thread. I decided not to double post my comment, so have edited my original post here. If you wish to see my poll with the comment I originally posted here, it's at http://forum.supercell.net/showthread.php/961898-Add-Vice-Leader-or-limit-of-Co-leaders-or-put-a-cool-down-time-on-co-kicks
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...95#post6204295
I'd like ur opinion on my version of this idea!!!! That should be the right link
This is a nice idea beaucose it's boring when everybody is co-leader and do what he wants... :) Sorry if something is wrong... I'm from Germany :P
The Blacklist (Lvl 5) is the best Clan ever :D
There definately needs to be another rank between co and elders
I like where you're going with the leader thing. I like the set up now with the lead and co leads. Maybe a captain is a good idea but ultimately the leader should only promote co leads. Im in a group now with about 10 co leads and an inactive leader. I dont even know if he/she plays and it drives me crazy! I would like to see if a leadership challenge can go out. Ive been in this clan for about a year and with me and a couple others we built it to a lvl 7 clan. But no leader to kick or demote the players who just go inactive. Its not fair to us who avidly play every day! Lose wars because of a faulty leader. Overall im all for this idea. I have more thoughts and views. Let me know what you think!
Need a war warden
who can maintain the war....
who can make a war plan n
who can maintain WAR DONATION BOX
N if he makes a plan n LOCK a member with plan or with a attack number THEN that member cant be able to attack anyone without his LOCKING NUMBER until the WAR wARDEN UNLOCK it..
He also maintain DONATION BOX N can be able to lock it..n he can lock to it to any member with his choice..before war he can make a request for DONATION BOX according his choice..n if he lock ARCHER for a member then that MEMBER cant be able to TAKE any troops except ARCHER...N IN MY OPINION THE POSITION WILL BE
Leader(1)
Co leader(5 n more)
War warden(5)
Elder
Yonger
how about adding ranks with no control over the clan, same like member but higher.
Nah OP, that's way too convoluted. And why would you want to restrict the number of given roles to a certain number? What if I wanted everyone else to be vice ? That idea alone could lead to friction for no reason.
Its too many roles all in all. The four levels we have are fine tbh.
I like the idea that noobs cannot see tesla and bombs for a few days, that's kinda cool. :smirk:
Love the idea to prevent war spies xDQuote:
-NEW (the same role w/ few changes)
-They basically have no authority until promoted to a higher role, but they can participate in clan wars.
-They also cannot see traps or hidden teslas when looking at other members bases and war bases. (This will prevent war spies.) (This is optional; leaders decision)
-They also cannot see what are in members clan castles and war castles, but they can still donate troops. (This is optional; leaders decision)
-After one week of being a new, their role will turn to blank like it does now and they will be able to see traps, hidden teslas, troops in castles, etc.
These changes will prevent clan war spies. Also, this makes it where the leader doesn't always have to be on, but they still have full control over their clan. This will make the leadership roles in a clan more structured.
Just to let you guys know the clan donation box I am refering to is the Clan Troop Bank in my signature. To see that thread just click on the link. Thanks!
(Not sure if I should be writing a separate thread for this, but.....)
Also like to suggest being able to edit and change the name of the positions in the game though the roles are essentially the same (for those who wants to keep a theme that matches clan name) So for example, let's say we have a clan named "Metamorphosis", the Leader could be called a "Butterfly", Co could be a "Cocoon, Elder could be "Caterpillar" and Member be an "Egg".
Just an idea since it's a game for fun, so why not be able to name things for a laugh? :P
The idea is great but I want it to be more personalize. Maybe we can freely edit names to those positions. Same positions and power but different name and according to what we want to make it more personalize.
The visitor idea is good but I think vice is unnecessary since we already have co leaders. The difference between co and leader is t that big
Yeah, would love to have that in the game.
My clan was just destroyed by a Co-Leader, who promoted another co-leader then pulled off a mutiny. Co-Leaders are very powerful and half to 3/4 of the people think they need to be a co-leader or their dignity is hurt.
How about:
Leader
Co-Leader = (limit 4) Same as now except cannot promote co-leaders
General = Major plus can start war
Major = Elder plus can write clan email once every 24 hours
Lieutenant = same as current elder
Soldier = same as a current member
Member = members cannot see traps on clan mates bases allowing recruiting to continue in prep day while we are all bored
Any level can promote, demote or kick out lower levels.
Trying to keep the reprogramming low, less to learn, and not blow up the app size.
I reckon that we should be able to have 2 leaders. This makes clan merging much easier. Leader demotion/boot becomes a vote between the other leader and all vice-leaders. There is a 48hr period for voting. whether the leader gets demoted/booted is up to percentage out of those who voted (minimum for booting/demoting needs 3 people to vote and in favour of kick/demotion). Although some might say the other leader could just pressure the vice leaders into a particular decision that is not true. If the vice leaders got demoted or kicked, the other leader could just invite/promote them again. Then it is most likely a challenge to the other leader would be laid down due their abuse of power. It is also important challenges can only be issued once a fortnight or so. This is because there is a maximum of 6 people who can issue a challenge, with each taking 2 days. This challenge system could also be adopted for other ranks if necessary.
Why not make a upgrade that gives the leader the abillity to give gold, elixer as a incentive for completed tasks by clanmates. The leader should have a few options to give for instance the first clanmate to level up one level gets a x amount of gold or elixer. Or the first one of the clan mates who successfully attack 5 attacks with a 100 percent gets say 25000 elixir. Some ideas to have your clan mates play for and upgrade towards.
Maybe if there was specific roles and titles for certain things. There would be more roles such as a War Captain that is in charge of who goes in wars because there are only a select few who start wars in clans anyway. We could also include, lets say, a title bearing the member who is the most generous and donates the most. So he/she can be recognized as the main donator, and maybe a Recruiter(s) to decide who is invited and accepts new clan members. This could work but it may mess with a lot of clans due to jealousy so depending on what else people think. This could happen. So, I insist, please leave comments about this idea.
I am with you great idea
I really like these, especially the new member status, so they can join and spy.
maybe in addition, that they can't request for 12 hours. So you don't get hoppers.
Aslo lol I like he limited captain/co leader status. As this will stop people asking for co, as there will literally be no way to promote them, and you don't feel obligated to consider everyone to be promoted. You can just say, no sorry, there is limited space, and so I'm picking only select few.
I didn't look to see if this one was posted, but I would love a "War General" role.
Only 1 person can be War General
They must be first promoted by the Leader
Leader and War General can promote a different War General
WG differs from Co-Leader in 1 main area, they can send more than 1 clan mail in a 12 hour period.
I often find that I have to time my clan mails perfectly to give war advice. It would be great if a WG could give like 3 clan mails during a 12 hour period while a war is in preparation or active!
Thank you
Truly, I think this is a good idea. Would be nice to not have war spies. Besides, it's about time some new clan roles should be added
Love some of the ideas. Especially the additions to the new members not being able to spy. Not sure we need to add vice leaders. Leaders and coleaders seems fine. But maybe make it so you can designate when they go from new to being members. And i like the idea also of having the person who starts a war be the general or war captain.
If you don't want spies, don't let your clan accept anyone in war ... only internal invite.
The spy should be a position, the only person in war that can leave the clan.
What I do to prevent me from that is to close the clan or increase a lot the trophies. The people that join need invitation, so if someone of my clan accept that people, the problem is in my clan. All the elder and co already knows, during the war nobody come in by self-invitation (this is clan organization problem..)
This idea is good but I think that nber of vice leaders should be increased from 3 to at least 5/6.
Good idea 👍👌
I think that clan leaders should be allowed to decide on the privileges that each position in the clan gets.
i.e, a clan leader can decide if he would like to:
Allow elders to kick(or not)
Allow clan leaders to change clan description
Allow members to invite
etc.
This would allow clan leaders more flexibility to manage the clan. And perhaps even individual members can receive special privileges by the leader, irregardless of rank. It's something to think about, I guess.
I hate spies but it's very difficult to control their arrival to your clan. We war non stop. Having a spy show up on prep day or battle day is bad. Can't close clan forever. Having "stuff" hidden too new members would bean incredible addition.Quote:
Originally Posted by 3runinho
This is a good idea
I really like everything. I would probably add a "Clan resource bank" for the Captains+ to manage. It would work like the troop bank but giving resources to help develop junior members.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jrap21
These ideas are awesome, however maybe there should be a BATTLE LEADER.
A battle leader should be in charge of all war strategies and all wars that the clan participates in. But the previous role of this player will stay the same.
For instance, i am a Co-Leader and if i was Battle Leader too, there should be a little shield somewhere on my name tag in the clan with the letters BL in the shield, but nothing else changes. It would be the same if i was just a member.
This means if anyone has any questions about the war, they know who to ask. The shield could be next to the player level and change colours like the leagues, so people can see how good their Battle Leader is within the clan. This shall be determined by the amount of stars won on the war map. I.e. under 30 stars is bronze, 31-60 silver, 61-100 gold 101-200 is purple ect.
Also, i think this would be good as a catalyst to encourage people to think about war strategies and what works and what doesn't work for your particular clan.
There should only be 1 Battle Leader in any one clan and any Leader or Co-Leader can appoint someone to be the Battle Leader, however, you cannot appoint yourself.
Just something to think about, maybe you guys at Supercell can make this idea better?
Thanks for reading!
Bethiiee
Good idea!Quote:
Originally Posted by Jrap21
Plz add a new power to freeze ability to 'ask for donations' of lower level members. Who have a bad donation ratio. So that they will be motivated to donate.
Kick them if they won't donate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Karansharm
What goes around comes around, and if they don't get that, they are not worth having.
This is very easily the best idea out there and needs to happen soo in my opinion along with the clan troop bank in order to save the players who are currently upset with supercell. Brilliant idea. This concept alone even being considered brings me new faith for the game. Absolutely love it.
Can't wait to get this in the next update. Please. Have so new people can't request till they donate. Also have a block so you can stop receiving troops you don't want. Like those m...... F....Ing goblins.
This is good idea but the change of new to member is current 3 to 4 days not 1 week get the eye there. Because spies came only for current war that ends in 2 days
Yeah nice idea, maybe too much ranks, but I get the point.
i think there should be something that's more than elder, but less than a co-leader.
Many may have very loyal and senior members in their clans, but these members may not have the commitment to become co-leaders yet (or ever). The difference in rank will distinguish them from the rest, and at the same time give them the recognition and appreciation that they deserve for their contributions. This helps in member retention too.
it is already suggested in the past under various forms, and with various purposes.
Nice job, i like your ideas, and i hope Supercell will make this. One of best ideas :D
Maybe not so many captains allowed, seems like pretty much 13 co leaders allowed, way to many for a normal clan.
I know for a fact I have thought along these lines before and I am sure this thought enters every clashers mind at some point. A good idea overall, it does need some refinements. I echo what some have posted already, decrease the headcount of role slots. 1 leader, two vice, 3 co leader, etc... You have my vote.
Nice idea you have my vote👍👍
Very nice idea ;)
I agree, I think there should be one or two more ranks in the clans.
Maybe go Leader, Captain, Elder, High Member, and Member.
Nice idea and the other is vice leader like that too.
Pls visit my thread about
multiplayer gameplay new change's
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...ameplay-Change
How many posts do we have to do saying we love this Ideal before sc includes it in the next update??????
Nice idea. I think it would be ok if "New" taken for war can see other's traps.
Hope this is added soon trying not to promote any more clan members from elder to CO . Hope S C can add this soon really need it. By the end of this month or sooner would really help out. Leader has not been around as his stand in I am the top CO and really could use this to lead in his absence.
I am wrighting this because my clan and i have a war strategy that we are finding is most beneficial. For now we do wars of 10v10 so we can stay organized are leader and cos come up with an attack plan that we all follow but wars with more than 10 members gets difficult to stay organized. To fix this issue we came up with a realistic like idea leader is like a general, co-leaders are like captians, and than each co "captian" would have a lieutenant to help keep 10 members under there lead stay organized. In theory the plan does work but a small difficulty would be how to tell a captain from a lieutenant. If there where more ranks this would help keep a balance of power plus i see that when rank is earned it helps the morale or members to want to do better for the clan more ranks will give ppl more to look fwd in the enjoyment of a reward for there hard work. Of course the naming of them is up for debate but i feel like 2 or 3 more rankings would do great for the clan a small update that can make things more fun. I really hope to see this happen soon. I feel like more ranks is way more beneficial. Leader - co leader - elder - knight - warrior - scout- member..... an other thing my clan does is roles or a job i am the "war lord" i start clan wars and make sure the roster is a good match up to give us the best chance and make sure everyone gets a fair turn at wars. Are leader is the "war marshel" he sends out war plan that we all follow (if you feel you cant do what is asked arrangements are made this is a game for fun not an other job lol) a differnt member if a recruter he goes on global and social media to find new members and we have a supporter that helps with all these tasks so maybe an extra feature to give roles to clans that likes this idea.
Great ideals right now I do all the roles . From war starting to recruitment. To supporting by getting people to donate . To assigning targets. A better rank system will help me delegate tasks. Fist bump your ideals.
http://supercell-forum-content.s3.am...cons/icon3.png PILGRIMAGE settingI am a clan leader. I wish there was a Pilgrimage setting for those clan members that are away at school or can't be active for whatever reason.
As as leader you could put them on (pilgrimage) and while they could clan chat, they could not be active. NO DONATION, NO WAR. They would be safe from kick, and with still being able to chat when they get back and post in clan chat I can return them to active duty. Right now my only option is to promo them to Co-lead and that isn't fair for the other active people trying to get to Co-leader status by participating and donating.
10v10 war is trivial to manage. There is even plenty of time for everyone to watch everyone's attack, and then build their next army based on what they see.Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenixlives
40v40 and 50v50 water is far more complex. 50 players can't wait and see where they are needed, they need pre-assigned bases, and then things change depending on attack failures, unexpected ambitions successes, and no shows and late shows.
I'm not sure that new clan leadership ranks make any difference here. The main issue is to recover from the situation of too many co-leaders, and the new member rank that can't see traps.
yeah, i very agreed for this idea.
Because Co-Lead and leader now look like same to me. except leader can kick co-lead, and not vice versa.
I am with u My idea is also same with few chances
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...w-clan-feature
Best idea ever
I think the clan member ranking system is a very important part of maintaining order within a clan. After all, the game is about clans and team building as much as it is about individual battles. I propose a simple 5 tier ranking system as follows:
1) Warlord - This is the new name for a Leader. All functions the same as Leader.
2) General - This is the new name for a Co-leader. All functions same as a Co-leader EXCEPT a General can only kick out members below his/her own title and a General cannot promote members to a General or above.
3) Captain - This is the new name for an Elder. All functions same as Elder EXCEPT a Captain can only kick out members below his/her own title and a Captain cannot promote members to a Captain or above.
4) Veteran - This is the new name for a Member. All functions the same EXCEPT they can now invite new members
5) Recruit - This is the new name for a New Member, but instead it is a title given to new players. Until they are promoted to Veteran or above, they will be unable to see hidden traps and bombs of fellow clanmates' home and war bases.
Please share your thoughts!
That is something what i was looking for. Great innovation that will improve clans community and will give more honour to active, loyal members. I up vote this idea and I houp supercell will bring it live.
Innovative and great .
May this idea get approved and the 'War Captain' idea is good so it too.
War captains should be the tiebreaker instead of the total destruction thing.
Happy Clashing
I want Supercell to see this, so I shall be very descriptive..
I LOVE the idea of the newbies not seeing traps until a certain time in the clan, or until they're promoted!
Instead of new ranks that I feel may make a few problems, as many would just get frustrated at the numerous ranks and confusing different rules within each, you guys should just make an option for leaders to customize what privelages and authority members would have. This epic game is made to let people have fun, friendly competition on nearly every level (clan rank, friendly battles, attacking, etc..), but I was recently talking to my clan leader who doesn't give co easily, he said that the problem with doing such is many would whine about not getting it themselves, and we came up with the idea that choosing privelages would be much easier. The leader could make their own ranks for each person that would maybe let a specific person thats elder demote people, but not promote to their level, or the leader could designate one person to be able to change the clan bio or send mail. And while having the ranks we do, the leaders could just stick simple with just member, elder and co, but the leader could just easily toggle each person's privelages and authority (examples would be an easy menu like... (Can demote ON/OFF---CAN PROMOTE--CAN KICK----CAN SEND MAIL----etc..)) if they felt co and elder weren't enough. I feel like such features would make an easy fix to people wanting new ranks when they could just make their own... If you at supercell, do seem to see this, I would LOVE an email just to say you saw this at least, so I know I'm heard, even if it isn't incorporated.. Thank you for your time :D see you guys in clash!!
I think it's a great idea. Preventing war spies(I believe they are mostly chinese. But it's only a personal belief.) is very good. Can you add something like promotion can be reversed like if leader is changed it can be reversed within a time like 2 minutes(by the previous leader).
Awesome idea..
i think the difference between co leader an captain is too small but the general idea of this is great :)
How about an leadership option to set a clanmates war status. Say if bob goes on vacation and forgets to opt out for war. Boom you opt him out.
I am more interested in limiting the freedom of members, mainly the leader having the option to choose whether members can donate or not. If a new member joins, they cannot donate unless a co approves it.
1) definitely beneficial to req and run clans so people won't donate bad troops
2) good for normal clans because some members do join and donate random troops without reading the request
Nice!!Supercell should really look at this
Ranks that are valid until war ends.
Just to add to the post by jrap21. We have (via CM) an appointed War General for each war, and it normally changes after each war. Many voice ideas for additional ranks, we would like at least 1 or 2 of those ranks to 'expire', I.e. Be valid until end of war.
There are a lot of ways of going about it, but just as info, in our clan we appoint the War General, or he volunteers. He often chooses his team, starts the war, does war plan (yes we don't use caller). He also may decide to appoint Captains for the war. The Captains take charge of th levels.
Why do this? As the Leader I work, and often stay out of war with hero/es down. During the war I give complete control of the war to war general, and ask him if he has a preferred base for me to attack (if I'm in the war). It gives co-leaders the chance to act as leader for a war. We also give elders captain to see if they are ready for Co.
Like I said, 'many ways to skin a cat', but my vote would be to have at least one rank that expires at end of war. Call it whatever you want, but it would be designed to avoid the "too many chiefs" scenario with a clan that has numerous Co in war.
Happy clashing. Fist, leader of adult monkeys
We definitely need a Vice-Leader or 2nd to leader. I had a problem while I was not on and these 2 co leaders were fighting furiously in chat. I have someone who is a co leader in the clan who is basically my second in command who could do nothing and they needed to be booted for their foul language. We need something for sure.
I would add the rank of Bishop between Elder and Captain. Same roles as Elder. We need more ranks for promotions (for war participation and donations) and also demotions (not attacking, conduct, etc)Quote:
Originally Posted by Jrap21