I agree to this, except that vice-leader should be co-leader. I also think that there should be unlimited number of co-leaders, captains, elders, and news.
Printable View
I agree to this, except that vice-leader should be co-leader. I also think that there should be unlimited number of co-leaders, captains, elders, and news.
If vice leader was co leader than there would be an overload of elders. I put a limit on those roles to make clans more structured and to make getting a role more rewarding than just getting it for free.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosticewolf
Well, I remember back in the day when there was just Leader and Elder. And that was enough. Then they added co-Leader. And still, the younguns complain that they need more roles. If they put those in, younguns will still be wantin more roles. There will never be enough.
#GetOffMyLawn
I am not young lol. Actually, I am pretty old and I just want this game to be better than it is now. Its only 1 more role which 2 people get, so no one should be saying that there are too many roles. Also, many people forget that vice leader is optional for the leader to promote.Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthrac
Some how I think the clan members should be able to chat with the clan leader to talk about any problems and or minor things about the wars or people in the clan. I also think we should be able to set up a "vote" or a way to agree on removing a leader and "vote" or somehow make a group decision within a time limit to choose a new leader that's in our group based on if they are fighting in wars and if they are winning or not.
No. If a leader that makes a good clan and works hard he should not lose his clan to some "vote". The leader always has all the power and authority and you can not take that away from him unless he gives it way. Maybe there should be some vote for removing a co leader or vice leader. I will think about that.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcherzGirl
Well back in 2012, You were allowed to have multiple leaders at the same time
Now WE have more updated system, One leader, co- leaders, elders, members.
But what i was thinking and would like to have is bring back the system where we are also allowed to promote multiple people, only up to 5, where they can be leaders, but. regardless, they can do anything but kick the original leader which who promoted them.
Therefore we would have about 5 leaders, few GMs, Captains, Elders, Memebrs, etc
Also, it would be awesome to have maybe possibly a system where instead of saying Leader, maybe switch it to Boss, Manager, Rookie, etc. Now theres the catch. You can have two mode for the names. 1 mode: all the names for the clan leadership would be proper, " Leader, Co leader, Captain, classic"
2nd mode: "Boss, Rookie, Manager, Newbie,etc" where it is more modern style way to call the leadership role
It is just a thought of mine. Hopefully everyone would agree and like this and let's together call out attention to SuperCell so they can see this and put this in the next update. Thanks :)
5 leaders are a lot. I think my way of doing it is somewhat more balanced.Quote:
Originally Posted by DaForce
I do also believe that roles should be simple and easy to remember, so that the leaders know which positions have permissions to do different things.
I feel co leader can only promote elder level and kick out.... They shouldnt make another co.. In my clan there were 50 and 16 were co as a leader i made 4 as a co and they multiplied it... The tragedy was one another clan mate joined here and became co and he kicked out all the members and he left the clan... As a result my clan failed... So kindly discuss further and take actions on it.... Only leader can kick out and make co....