New Leadership Positions/Roles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jrap21

Thats why you only promote people you trust to vice leader. SC can not control who you promote to ranks.

---

You're missing the point of when you and your vice leader become inactive.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by George1971

You're missing the point of when you and your vice leader become inactive.

---

Let me see..... If a leader or co leader become inactive now then the clans gonna fall apart. SC cant fix people being inactive. I really do not understand what you want SC to do in this case.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jrap21

Then there would be no point for roles. Also, this would be hard for SC to do i think.

---

From a programming standpoint, it would not be difficult to implement. It's just a relational database.

But rankings would still have value. Roles would default based upon rankings, but you could have various levels of elder and co-leader.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jrap21

Let me see..... If a leader or co leader become inactive now then the clans gonna fall apart. SC cant fix people being inactive. I really do not understand what you want SC to do in this case.

---

Implement a second tier of leadership, below the leader, with its own capability of management. The best number is three, not two. These three are the right number to be able to manage the clan while the leader is in hospital, and being three, can use majority vote on any contentious decision, such as demoting one of them.

An inactive leader does not mean the clan falls apart, and if it were true, then the lower ranks have no significant roles.


To recap:

* If the leader is present and active, lower ranks have no management importance and are just there for vanity and inviting their friends.

* If the leader is away, and there is to be a second tier leadership team, then the team should have an odd number of members to facilitate decision making. One allows no mechanism for an unexpected absence. Two doesn't allow any checked system for removal of one. Three members does.

I really like this. I have been wanting more leadership roles for a long time. It would make rewarding the good members much easier.:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Conqueror777

From a programming standpoint, it would not be difficult to implement. It's just a relational database.

But rankings would still have value. Roles would default based upon rankings, but you could have various levels of elder and co-leader.

---

If you assign roles in your clan than there is no point for leadership. No, that's a bad idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by George1971

Implement a second tier of leadership, below the leader, with its own capability of management. The best number is three, not two. These three are the right number to be able to manage the clan while the leader is in hospital, and being three, can use majority vote on any contentious decision, such as demoting one of them.

An inactive leader does not mean the clan falls apart, and if it were true, then the lower ranks have no significant roles.


To recap:

* If the leader is present and active, lower ranks have no management importance and are just there for vanity and inviting their friends.

* If the leader is away, and there is to be a second tier leadership team, then the team should have an odd number of members to facilitate decision making. One allows no mechanism for an unexpected absence. Two doesn't allow any checked system for removal of one. Three members does.

---

What is with this in three stuff? No, if I put to many roles SC will not implement this. Vice leaders can not demote other vice leaders that would just cause too much tension within the clan. If a clan falls apart because of an inactive leader than that is the leaders fault not the clans. My roles are fine as is. We don't need this extra role.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soccercrazy1

I really like this. I have been wanting more leadership roles for a long time. It would make rewarding the good members much easier.:D

---

Thanks! I agree!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Donate4Fun

I like the idea behind it but I mean the layout as in removing restrictions to what can be done, a clan is each leaders choice so why should someone tell them they can only have of this or 9 of that, yes the max is 50 players but many clans have a high success rate how they run there clan and others don't I like the idea if adding ranks to give leaders more ability to show praise and promote there members tho

---

Limiting numbers in roles will make clans more structured. Yes, this would give leaders more ability to show praise and promote the members.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rahle

I don't think a new rank is needed in game. HOWEVER, I would love to see that if you have the new flag as a new member that any war type viewing should be restricted until the current war is over. It's easy to say to close the clan while you war but not every clan can turn away a viable person that wishes to join. Simply make it so that spies are unable to see anything. Case closed whe it comes to spies

---

What do you mean by a new flag?