Title is self explanatory. What is the point of them being there unless they hold a significant value. Since its only 1 person why not award them maybe a mil of each loot and say 2500 de on top of their cw winnings.
Printable View
Title is self explanatory. What is the point of them being there unless they hold a significant value. Since its only 1 person why not award them maybe a mil of each loot and say 2500 de on top of their cw winnings.
This is a good idea,
it would promote more effort in attacks.
People whom use their attacks for selfish means in a war would now also want to get the most heroic attack/or defence (possibly) being more helpful for the team!
While I like the idea the problem is the way its calculated. It's bases off player lvl not really the best attack so it doesn't really mean anythingQuote:
Originally Posted by TheVillageLeon
It should be calculated by how better that than you was that player.
Making it functionally impossible for the top 1-5 players to ever achieve? The main problem with this is that it will encourage people to stray from good war strategy to attack higher than they should and get that fat loot bonus. #30 attacking #1 for one star can help sometimes but not every war..Quote:
Originally Posted by Volkner
I think the most heroic thing should be eliminated to begin with. It's a useless replay.
If they tweek it to work PROPERLY or shall I say better, then I'll consider this as a good idea.
Bonuses for Heroic Attack/Defense should be in the game since as stated before top players will almost never get it