If a clan war ends in a tie, the leader from each clan need to attack each other and the winner decides the win for the clan. Ties just aren't the right way to end a clan war after so much time and resources have been invested by each player.
Printable View
If a clan war ends in a tie, the leader from each clan need to attack each other and the winner decides the win for the clan. Ties just aren't the right way to end a clan war after so much time and resources have been invested by each player.
And if the leader is asleep? :rolleyes:
Or if the leader is inactive/retired?Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatLach
That would be a nice twist to a draw in war:cool:
Also not all leaders are the highest ranked, I think the tie-break could be quite skew if this were to be implemented just for leaders, a tie break would be a nice addition however, perhaps give the lowest rank an extra attack on number 1 on the map and the one with the highest damage wins and gets additional loot.
I love the idea of a last second raid
And if if the leader of one clan is much stronger than the other.
IN a lot of clans (mine being one) if it is the last second and both attacks have not been used that is considered a problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bwit51
I agreed with the comments about the leader not always being the strongest. I think (if they were to decide this should be done at all, I am only half sold myself) each clan gets to pick the attacker AND the base that will be attacked. But also, and this might be a problem, you really have to allow a full prep day and then a full battle day. I know kids with nothing in life but games will say to shorten those. But to be fair to the entire community the war just got another 48 hours added. So in that case it should also be a 2 clan decision to accept the tie.
Of course, since its basically another full war period maybe it would be easier if both clans were simply offered a rematch choice only in the event of a tie. (Obviously its a good matchup so no problem with that part) Frankly with the 24 hours to change bases around (since they saw them on the replays now) would be a fun strategy exercise.
What if a leader is lvl 100 et the other clan leader is lvl 50 ?
It would be a good idea but not to have a leader vs a leader....
it's good if we offer the possibility to both clans to accept or not to rematch, if both leaders accept to rematch, in this case each member will have only 1 attack instead of two and without a war preparation day, a direct war will be on...
One clan nominate a representative and the other clan can accept or deny. If accept they must present their on champion and they duel... sorta
I think the best solution would just be that the 2 clans are offered the choice to accept a tie or rematch.
Also, there has been an argument that offering a one time rematch would be a good feature anyhow. Of course if one clan murders the other then the loser is not going to accept that. But there are times in a close war the two sides want another go. But even if it was only available in a case of tie that would ee I think a fun option. Both clans get tie loot but their next war is right away and with each other.
Why not just have the winner determined with the highest percentage of destruction?
What if they tie too? You tied because the results were the same, if you don't want to tie then do better next time
Then.... go by the shortest Average attack duration. If that is the same, then forget it - it's a tie!
Only idea that would make sense seems to be a rematch feature--would be cool anyway.
I wouldn't say it would have to be the leader maybe you could do like a vote who gets the last attack or something like that?
Rematch with one attack per person, if that ends in a draw, rematch with one attack each for top 5 (they can attack only the top 5). If that ends in a draw, then the clan win most wins is announced the winner.