How would you prefer lava hounds to be nerfed?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gama321

Next time don't reply to me if what you say doesn't address what you responded to. And no, for th10s hounds achieve better results than gowiwi/pe. What heroes they have is completely irrelevant, especially since heroes work better with ground attacks as they can work together with the ground troops, the fact is that they pretty much unilaterally use hounds, because hounds work the best for them, regardless of base. Therefore it is not balanced and hounds will be nerfed in order to balance, what is it that you are struggling to understand?

---

If you would have read the first sentence of my comment it was addressing the underlined statement. you suggested a new troop and i implied you would just complain about it afterwards. Simple enough no?

I think they are fine. If anything perhaps increase build time and reduce pups. But really they are fine.

The only people who thinks Lava Hounds need to be nerfed are those who cannot use them effectively nor adjust their base to defend air attacks effectively. ;)

add in the option- Or no changes at all

It's not a fair poll if you don't have that option as it is a true preference.

I vote no changes at all. The unit is too new and needs time for strategies to be implemented and people need more time to be attacked by it and to learn how to better defend against it.

I personally feel some people hate lava hounds because they 1. Don't understand them or 2. Are upset their anti-gowipe base doesn't also take out quadlavaloon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hickster83

If you would have read the first sentence of my comment it was addressing the underlined statement. you suggested a new troop and i implied you would just complain about it afterwards. Simple enough no?

---

Exactly, you didn't reply to what I said in context, why I said that it would bring back balance to the game and what it would achieve, almost as if you are incapable of putting sentences together. Or was that your idea of a joke?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hickster83

Believe it or not there aren't that many troop compositions available at the moment that are viable for war. Maybe the issue is there aren't enough troops.

---

Must be if you went on to agree with me

Why shouldn't we be able to three star th10s? whats wrong with that? It does take skill to two-three star maxed bases no matter what troop composition you are using (unless its a stupid base design or you're using a design that you got off the internet). Hounds don't need a nerf, players need to learn how to design bases that are difficult to three star. Basically if you get three starred change your base, the opponent found a weakness and exploited it. This doesn't mean we should ask Supercell to take away our troops or to make them harder to use.....

I think they are fine the way they are. Quit crying nerf.

Wow, it's like hogs all over again!

No Nerf necessary. An expensive troop that takes a long time to train and needs to be deployed in proper conjunction with other troops SHOULD be powerful. It's not like you can spam hounds and get three stars, like the bad old days of hogs or witches. Most people have switched to air because ground attacks have been nerfed with skeleton traps and the fourth mortar. I would prefer balance be achieved through a slight buff to ground troops. This is an attacking game. It isn't fun if effective strategies are all removed. Staring at my pretty base in defence will only hold my interest for so long.

I can see Hounds are going to be doomed just like Hogs... Oh well, luckily i still have L5 Dark barracks, so i don't have to worry :rolleyes::rolleyes: