"Retry" option for attack practice

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by indirectMW

Thank you Battle for referring me to this excellent suggestion!

---

No problem if you wanna check out any other ideas I support click "BattleBorn Approved Ideas" in my sig

Nice Idea!
I support You!

You sir, have the support of me and a 100 000 more clashers :P

Haven't been on e forum in a week, and I'm scrolling through " battleborn approved ideas" and it looks like I'm really missing out! Great idea! :D

A really solid take on the commonly flawed attack simulation idea. Definitely a fan of this version of the idea. Even got the bb seal, nice.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by prancingpony

Haven't been on e forum in a week, and I'm scrolling through " battleborn approved ideas" and it looks like I'm really missing out! Great idea! :D

---

Lol glad to know my idea list is helping good ideas get noticed

Still the best attack a base for practice idea ive seen. Going to bump this up

My first thought was..... Hell No! ...but after reading it properly, I must say....Hell Yeah, thats a great idea.

Gud idea....if this doesnt happen....other thing u cud do is u can just atk ur own clan mates by just selecting troops and not training em with money,no loss no gain except practice

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EricS568

I'm curious about your thoughts on the potential exploitability: are you concerned that for "folks on the leaderboard," the population is small enough that there's a real likelihood of encountering the same person again? That's an interesting thought. Maybe limit retries to one on multiplayer attacks, and maybe somewhat more (3?) on war attacks?

---

Yep, this is the guaranteed exploitation of this variant and I doubt SC wants to stab their top gem pushers in the back. One easy fix would be to simply disable it above master league. If you are playing at that level the need to practice/learn is greatly diminished so it might not be a deal breaker.

This doesn't allow clan members or friends to spar or test one another's bases which is one of the most common reasons to request a system like this and I am surprised there aren't already some complaints about that. All in all a solid approach though. You have my support.