Printable View
tO eND aNY mORE mISPLACED bARBS aND uNWANTED aTTACKS/ LoST cUPS aND bROKEN dREAMS.. sOME oF uS hAVE bIG fINGERS, oR sMALLER pHONES, aND sOME oF uS jUST cANT aIM aND a bIGGER nEXT bUTTON wOULD bE nICE.. kEEP eVERYTHING tHE sAME sIZE bUT mAKE tHAT wHOLE cORNER gOING sTRAIGHT dOWN fROM tHE bUTTON rEACT aS iF iT wAS a nEXT tAP.. sEE vID fOR vISUALS.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf7D48Aj7qA
I agree ! It should at least be another 1 cm big on each side.
wHILE I cAN uNDERSTAND tHIS iRRITATING fONT aND wHAT yOU aRE sAYING, wouldn't using a normal way of typing help people like your idea more?
I agree with the idea, but it probably isn't on the priority list as the problem is mainly that your hands are clumsy. Sorry about that,
Please NO.
The next botton is already quite big on my screen(I play on an iTouch)
And then I'll request to make it smaller!
Meh, I guess so...but not TOO big
I second that, I play on an s5 and the amount of times I have nexted when trying to place troops is really frustrating. Even playing on an s3 I get this problem sometimes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sukiawesome
How about instead of making it bigger to have a size selection make a small medium and large setting selection. That way the player can choose what they want. I have issues with sometimes accidentally hitting the next button and would actually like it smaller.
That would make things too complicated and I doubt Supercell is willing to invest time and only to fix this. Everyone will accidentally click on it at some point regardless of size and come on the forums to ask to add more options.Quote:
Originally Posted by laudate
I don't think it needs changing its big enough on the phone and the larger screen size on tablets makes it bigger anyway, it's big enough you just need to look where you tap IMO
Holy.... What the heck is with your writing? This is giving me a headache. Translate it into legible english please.Quote:
Originally Posted by bONS
OT: This is not necessary whatsoever. In fact, it would prove quite annoying for those on small phones.
@Poll: I love how you make the no option effectively saying that we like messing up. That is not true at all. Some of us, myself included, have no issues with the size of the next button, and have never accidentally dropped a troop. Therefore, we do not want this feature added, but your no option on the poll is the opposite of the reason why.
Horrible idea presented in a horribly written thread with a poll that has no correct answer. Having no troop selected by default is already under consideration and is a better solution to the same problem.
Lol, how about a smaller caps lock button?
The button is already big for me :3
I fixed the font for you guys. It was really annoying.Quote:
Originally Posted by bONS
It is astounding how simply rearranging that can make him sound like a rational human being instead of a spastic creature from CapsLockville.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ideaman
I don't even hate his idea... but I did in that style of writing and voted No because of it lol.
why not a back button!!
Because technically that is a problem. If just one person was searching it would be easy. But this is a multithreaded queue (very complex, not even single file because of all the different levels of bases and searchers) that is being searched simultaneously by hundreds (thousands?) of guys. So as soon as a base is passed on it gets offered to the next person. So the only way they could give it back to you would be to rip it out from under someone else, which of course would be wrong. So fr that reason they do expect us to be careful. So yes it is understandable accidents happen, but we have to live with our mistakes in this case. A do over is not possible.Quote:
Originally Posted by immortalzrizing
Some may argue that my statements are stupid and I don't know what I am talking about. That is a valid counterargument as it has yet to be disproven. So if you feel that way I will instead refer you to what SC has said on the matter....
Currently Ruled Out:
Here are some amazing ideas that have been ruled out by the dev time for the time being. Posting these ideas will result in your thread being removed without notice!
.....
Battle Related:
*Ability to filter matchmaking by resources or trophies available
*Capture live attackers and have them reassigned to your own clan castle, army camps, or new structure
*Bonus/award if attacker skips your village – partial payment to you on match fee
*On Offensive Battle Summary include resource cost of troops/spells used
*Ability to assign 5 or so of your own troops to defend Town Hall, same AI as CC, smaller radius
*Ability to transfer a revenge to a clan member or public hitlist
*Auto reset/repurchase traps if you win a defense (shield didn’t activate, still attackable)
*Add a small chance to “Steal/Win/Replace” spells on an attack victory (suggest 3-star only)
*Back button in matchmaking for accidental “Next” clicks – Perhaps cost double fee to return
*Deactivate spell selection after casting to avoid multiple mis-casts, make user re-select if wanted
*Add a 1-2 second spell casting cooldown to prevent unwanted multiple mis-casts
Didn't bother to read this idea and rated the thread 1 star. Type like a normal human being next time.
What about a smaller thumb or index finger?? :rolleyes:
So true. I got a headache because of cAPSlOCKvILLEQuote:
Originally Posted by Goobers