4 star clan war system

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MichaelJohnLeClair

As a TH10 I would LOVE this implementation... So many times I can say that in my opinion I attack perfectly or at least very effectively and simply pull off the same 85ish% I always do. Now, I may be not seeing where the improvement might be needed but the only thing I can relate this to is my extremely low level heros - my King is a measly 14 and my Queen is an even more measly 12.

I have over 500 war stars (clan has over 105 wins) and feel strongly that this is obviously a HUGE piece that is missing from my attacks.

Having a 4 star system, like this thread is proposing, will distance the lower level th10 and higher level th9s that are just barely squeaking out a 2star vs a TH10.

To account for this, even though I am the "#1 base" in my clan I more rarely attack the opposing clan's TH10 and leave it to my #2-5 teammate who will 2 star it as explained above. This will leave me to attack the maxed TH9s that I have a better chance at three starring than my teammates do.

I can see how this would be a big problem with clan wars that are all th10 vs th10's.

---

Thank you. Helful coment

What about a five star system with a star Awarded when you destroy 25% of enemys buildings.

Bump, rate 5 stars, vote yes.

Although, as someone stated earlier I would want some way so people don't get confused when attacking in regular multiplayer scenarios.

But as for 4 stars in war, yes yes yes yes yes.

I have seen people get 99% and only 1 star so maybe it would be more accurate if they changed the way stars are earnt. I don't think it would change the boredom factor you speak of though. Are you sure they aren't just getting bored because it's more likely that people can't get 100%?

Would you consider longer battle times instead because I've also seen many bases that are spaced out so much that they use the time limit as a way to protect themselves and I see this as ♥♥♥♥♥ing the system a bit, why should a poor layout escape a 3 star just because they have spaced their buildings so much?

Longer battle times in war would expose bad layouts and people trying to beat the system and not the player. But good points raised OP��.

Edit: Also the army compositions might be more individual if they don't have to worry about running out of time as much as they have to now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DenisMessia

What about a five star system with a star Awarded when you destroy 25% of enemys buildings.

---

NO, if they do this all people would get 1 Star because 25% it's too easy and the bonus as consequence. What i propose doesn't change Clan Wars drastically. It changes only the dynamics so that people don't calculate only to get 50% + TH but try also to reach at least 75%.

I really like this idea. A 3-star system doesn't really reflect the awesomeness of some attacks. There's nothing worse than getting a 99% one-star war raid. I hope SC considers this!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by k2aries

I really like this idea. A 3-star system doesn't really reflect the awesomeness of some attacks. There's nothing worse than getting a 99% one-star war raid. I hope SC considers this!

---

Right man! Please vote, more the people comment and vote more the chance that supercell consider this thread

I have been begging for a 4 or 5 star system like this for MONTHS! But you laid your idea out better than mine.


http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...scoring-system

The only problem I have with this is hog riders but maybe it is not a to10 problem? the other day I just got 80% one star by level 5 hog riders and 4 healing spells.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MomoZB

The only problem I have with this is hog riders but maybe it is not a to10 problem? the other day I just got 80% one star by level 5 hog riders and 4 healing spells.

---

Didn`t unferstand your question! Can you explain me better...