Printable View
To make individual performance more relevant, whoever gets most stars/ succesful defenses in a war in would earn the title of MVP and get 10% extra war loot bonus.
A problem that may arise is people attacking lower level bases for MVP, but that only works against them since lower bases = less loot. Also, their defense plays a part in whether or not they earn the title.
Just a small idea, let me know what you think.
If you look at the scoreboard for the war, there is a star in a blue box. touch it and scroll to the bottom of war stats and there is a 'best attack' and 'best defense' for each clan.
The most heroic attack and defense are the MVPsQuote:
Originally Posted by atorr0582
I think I've read somewhere that the most heroic attack is based on a successful attack and how much higher it is from your suggested attack. What I'm suggesting is that the number of stars next to your name, in the clan stats, showing how many stars your earned your clan should count for something more. If you got six stars and 3/3 successful defenses, the title of MVP is probably suitable since you played a big part in the winning of that war.Quote:
Originally Posted by BattleBorn007
Quality of stars is what wins wars, so I don't think that the MVP idea adds anything fairly.Quote:
Originally Posted by atorr0582
In most good lower level clans a lot of people get 6 starsQuote:
Originally Posted by atorr0582
This is not good in my opinion. Although it encourages attacking, it makes the whole clan go greedy for it. Also troll bases can easily give heroic defenses.
What's wrong with the everyone going greedy for it? Everyone trying to get the most stars possible and putting up the best defense seems to me as an effective approach at war.Quote:
Originally Posted by sylveonzmushi
I'd just let ur clan decide. But I don't think supercell looks at half the stuff on here anyway.
If you don't plan right, and have too many greedy or prideful attackers going for 6 stars, they could block out attack options for other players, rendering your clan's possible attacks useless.Then you have other member either not attacking, or attacking 3 star bases just so they use thier attacks, or be kicked. Or depending on how strick (or close minded) your clan is, could kick them anyway for not scoring, ignoring the fact they planned to do scoring attacks, but others beat them to it before they had a chance.
That is a more extreme example, but the point is, is to show a clan shooting themselves in the foot out of greed or pride of preforming better than the other.
Now I'm in a clan that, while hardly perfect, is apparently above average, since we win almost all of our wars... almost. We recently had one clan almost totally wipe out all our bases because they put aside personal wins, did the first attack on the same # base as them, which were mostly effective, and then used the other half.as cleanup for the few people that messed up. We did our usual amount of attacks and damage, but couldn't match them. Hardly any of them really scored 6 stars for the clan, but of course won. Our clan however had quite a few people that scored 6 stars... Yeah, fat lot of good that did us.