Dark minion king hero

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BattleBorn007

Ok first Heroes from troops already in game are ruled out
*Requests for every troop types to have a related hero

---

There's an argument about what that line actually means on the forum every couple of days. It's getting awesome to watch. Anyone got pitchforks?

Quote:

---

Secondly a minion being a King is just weird as said before

---

I agree, weird. Minion Master perhaps? A flying hero sounds so broken but might just work.

Anyway, it could be that the future for heroes is interchangeable heroes on limited number of pedestals - and upgrading them off pedestal. It's a partial solution for the 'heroes in war' requests etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by choczombie

There's an argument about what that line actually means on the forum every couple of days. It's getting awesome to watch. Anyone got pitchforks?


[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Ubuntu]
I agree, weird. Minion Master perhaps? A flying hero sounds so broken but might just work.

Anyway, it could be that the future for heroes is interchangeable heroes on limited number of pedestals - and upgrading them off pedestal. It's a partial solution for the 'heroes in war' requests etc.

---

I feel that "Requests for every troop types to have a related hero" means if a troops exist in the game it will not have a related hero like how the archer has the queen and the barbarian has the king.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BattleBorn007

I feel that "Requests for every troop types to have a related hero" means if a troops exist in the game it will not have a related hero like how the archer has the queen and the barbarian has the king.

---

Yep, that's one argument. It'd be lovely if they fixed the grammar or clarified what they wanted to say. If you want to keep arguing the meaning of what looks like year 2 English, go ahead (I'll grab the popcorn).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by choczombie

Yep, that's one argument. It'd be lovely if they fixed the grammar or clarified what they wanted to say. If you want to keep arguing the meaning of what looks like year 2 English, go ahead (I'll grab the popcorn).

---

Im not going to argue it im just going to continue to state it as i see it until a mod or some other supercell rep says what they actually mean by it. Ive said and quoted it plenty of times I think a mod or two much have seen it by now.However can you link me a thread just for the what does *Requests for every troop types to have a related hero mean.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pyroflame

Wow it's literally what the sticky implies. I'm not speaking for Supercell.

http://www.hahastop.com/pictures/Derp591.jpg

---

From that picture is the first time I have EVER cried of laughter off of the clash of clans forums lol.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UnmercifulCanteloupe1

From that picture is the first time I have EVER cried of laughter off of the clash of clans forums lol.....

---

Glad I could bring someone joy :o:o:o

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxionXD

Ruled out by Supercell.

Besides, why would a village have TWO Kings?

Also, why would a village ever make a "Minion" into royalty?

---

Imao, you just made my day.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fanboy17

That's nonsense zac and Tink have confirmed many time a that new heroes including those based on existing troops are not ruled out, why don't you find a new forum to police or better yet go get a life

---

Feel free to take the time to find the quote. I could have sworn I heard the no more for existing troop come from actual staff not just from player moderators.


Or better yet, if staff could verify one way or another, that'd be great.