Dark minion king hero

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EpicChris

You know it's against the forum rules to speak for Supercell.

---

Wow it's literally what the sticky implies. I'm not speaking for Supercell.

http://www.hahastop.com/pictures/Derp591.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pyroflame

Wow it's literally what the sticky implies. I'm not speaking for Supercell.

---

This is exactly I was asking for clarification. People might interpret implications differently and SC might word things wrong too. No need to insult people

Now that I think about it, SC has said that there can be new heroes but never clarified on whether the 'ever troop type' means that heroes based on troops is ruled out or whether it's request for all 16 troops to have a hero counterpart

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sirix

This is exactly I was asking for clarification. People might interpret implications differently and SC might word things wrong too. No need to insult people

---

Simply defending myself with a funny picture. No insults here. I like you so you get a cat picture.

http://cutestcats.us/wp-content/uplo...6-1024x985.jpg

I would like for the sticky to have a clearer meaning for each ruled out idea, so far there has been many misunderstandings.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sirix

EDIT: Now that I think about it, SC has said that there can be new heroes but never clarified on whether the 'ever troop type' means that heroes based on troops is ruled out or whether it's request for all 16 troops to have a hero counterpart

---

Yeah it sure is easy to think like that. But just during my couple weeks here on the forums, the consensus seems to interpret it the other way around. Meaning no goblin hero, no giant hero, etc. At least for now. And so that's how I will interpret it until there is further clarification from Supercell. It would be an odd statement to make for them to say you can request goblin hero, giant hero, etc. but not all at once, no?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pyroflame

Yeah it sure is easy to think like that. But just during my couple weeks here on the forums, the consensus seems to interpret it the other way around. Meaning no goblin hero, no giant hero, etc. At least for now. And so that's how I will interpret it until there is further clarification from Supercell. It would be an odd statement to make for them to say you can request goblin hero, giant hero, etc. but not all at once, no?

---

I guess one sort of clarification would be to report this thread to have it deleted since that's what's supposed to happen to ruled out ideas. If it's ignored/locked (because we're no longer talking about the goblin hero), this isn't ruled out. If it's deleted, it is.

Edit in reference to the last sentence below: I don't know what I believe anymore about 'every troop type'. All I know is that it doesn't rule out new heroes or at least that's what SC said in a thread somewhere

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sirix

I guess one sort of clarification would be to report this thread to have it deleted since that's what's supposed to happen to ruled out ideas. If it's ignored/locked (because we're no longer talking about the goblin hero), this isn't ruled out. If it's deleted, it is.

---

Well, albeit, Supercell hasn't been very good about keeping up with that rule. I've seen threads that are clearly ruled out beyond hero requests and they don't get deleted. Nonetheless, let's see what happens. Still, it seems you'll believe the statement one way and I will believe it one way until the sticky is changed to be more direct.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sirix

That's not a clarification. That's repeating the source

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EpicChris

The OP is of course not asking for every troop to have a hero, which is what is ruled out.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pyroflame

I disagree, unless a mod wants to chime in. Supercell's statement says "every troop" as an all encompassing means to an end. What, you think every person who requests a hero is going to request a hero for each troop type? No, more likely they will request a goblin hero, a giant hero etc. which by my understanding is ruled out.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sirix

This is exactly I was asking for clarification. People might interpret implications differently and SC might word things wrong too. No need to insult people

Now that I think about it, SC has said that there can be new heroes but never clarified on whether the 'ever troop type' means that heroes based on troops is ruled out or whether it's request for all 16 troops to have a hero counterpart

---

Clarification was given by Supercell as one point. I'm not digging through thousands of threads to find it. The ruled out wording is to imply that no more heroes of current troops will be made. They didn't, however, rule out Heroes of different origins. So a hero that's a.... Spider, or whatever, is not ruled out. They ruled out further Heroes based on existing troops.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxionXD

Clarification was given by Supercell as one point. I'm not digging through thousands of threads to find it. The ruled out wording is to imply that no more heroes of current troops will be made. They didn't, however, rule out Heroes of different origins. So a hero that's a.... Spider, or whatever, is not ruled out. They ruled out further Heroes based on existing troops.

---

That's nonsense zac and Tink have confirmed many time a that new heroes including those based on existing troops are not ruled out, why don't you find a new forum to police or better yet go get a life

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by domomike00

As you know there is an archer queen and a barbarian king. We would love to see another hero come out. So much to do with gobs, wizards, giants. Maybe even one based off the dark troops. Maybe a flying minion king. It would bring something new and exciting to the game. He could even have a flame crown. Just think about it. Ty for listening

---

Ok first Heroes from troops already in game are ruled out
*Requests for every troop types to have a related hero

Secondly a minion being a King is just weird as said before