Printable View
It would be great to be able to set your cc troops to "sleep" like the heroes. It would help in war troop donations so you wouldn't have to have a shield to protect your troops during wartime. It would let clanmates donate when they are ready and not have to wait.
it would be nice to be able to get your war troops donated and know they aren't going to be spent in a multi-player defense.
Meh some people lure cc and kill it just so that person gets raided worse. Sometimes i do it when droppping. So no:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Macintosh12
Ruled Out please read the stickies before postingQuote:
Originally Posted by Macintosh12
Defensive Structure Related:
*Ability to camouflage/purchase camouflage – (make AT appear as a barracks until within range)
*Ability to load current x-bow with elixir or dark elixir for extra bonus of some sort
*Stack def structures – ATs over walls, Teslas on top of barracks (truly hidden), etc.
*Upgrade to 2-story walls that hog riders/jump spell can’t penetrate (maybe limit #)
*Display both X-bow range circles at once for planning – different color on inactive one
*Modify clan castle – toggle defend/not defend (like heroes)
*Auto request CC troops in clan if you win a defense (shield didn’t activate, still attackable)
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...rum-guidelines
Like.
No no not ruled out, just ruled out "at this time" and this time was long ago. We need to keep saying what we want..
Troops wanted for clan castle defense are different to troops wanted for clan castle attack.
No if it's still saying ruled out in the sticky then it's still ruled out now!Quote:
Originally Posted by George1971
End of Debate
I understand the hero comparison, but clan castles only have 20 minutes downtime, while heroes can be well over an hour.
Making the hero sleep mode more valuable.
How do you know? It's such an old message saying ruled out at this time. There's an obvious need for separate lists "Definitely ruled out" and "Yes, we know, maybe one day but not soon", and the second list needs a way to be commented on over time.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFirstSteven
This one looks to definitely belong to the second list. In keeping with the game, improves game play, but requires significant coding change.
Currently Ruled Out:Quote:
Originally Posted by George1971
Here are some amazing ideas that have been ruled out by the dev time for the time being. Posting these ideas will result in your thread being removed without notice!
Too bad they don't remove them like they said they would
Obviously, the words don't mean what they say. And they are self contradicting. We want this, and we want to be able to register this want, and people referencing the poorly written "stickies" (in-club jargon) aren't doing anything constructive.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gama321
Sorry but this subforum is for new ideas, not posting stuff they have considered and even ruled out. If you had something related to cc sleeping but was fundamentally different then fine, but you don't, you may as well have copy/pasted it from the sticky yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by George1971
To repeat, anything in the sticky is something you can be assured they have heard and even considered so there is no point in posting anything from there. That's why people quote it when ignorant people like you come along and give 'ideas' that are in that sticky.
Where is the forum for commenting on existing ideas?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gama321
The few words of this idea in the sticky are woefully few. There is much more to this idea.
"Ruled out for the time being" does not mean "ruled out".
What you are saying is that anything mentioned in your sticky is a censored topic, and you yourself are a censorship enforcer. Why? And is it working?
Sorry Born,
i did spend 25 minutes reading the sticky on my iPhone screen and must have missed that one line.
so sorry for offending.
Mac
Quote:
Originally Posted by BattleBorn007
I know this is an old thread. Despite being in the sticky as being ruled out - as everyone so kindly pointed out ... I couldn't find any logic behind why it's ruled out. Clearly lots of people would benefit from the option for war - making the planning of attacks significantly more convenient without trying to balance shields, member donatations and a time in the day when they can get on to attack for war.