Finally!! the proof that inactive bases dosn't get removed from the queue!!

To all those who say inactive bases gets removed from queue, explain this!!!

http://i62.tinypic.com/2gujyo2.png
http://i58.tinypic.com/126733s.png
http://i61.tinypic.com/20jspqf.png

As you can see, his sweet victory is 1250 although he got 2462 cups!! meaning this guy hasn't logged in since the 27th of August 2013 when the player profile update was introduced. In fact, I actually think this guy hasn't logged in since at least 23rd may 2013 since his base is maxed (for that update) and doesn't have witches and only one level 2 inferno and his camps are still level 8.

As said many many many times before: they don't get removed but they get pushed back in queue so far so that they are technically removed.

Got pics of a base that hasn't been attacked in 20 days.

Apperently once in a while they slips such old bases back into the queue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mavios

To all those who say inactive bases gets removed from queue, explain this!!!

http://i62.tinypic.com/2gujyo2.png
http://i58.tinypic.com/126733s.png
http://i61.tinypic.com/20jspqf.png

As you can see, his sweet victory is 1250 although he got 2462 cups!! meaning this guy hasn't logged in since the 27th of August 2013 when the player profile update was introduced. In fact, I actually think this guy hasn't logged in since at least 23rd may 2013 since his base is maxed (for that update) and doesn't have witches and only one level 2 inferno and his camps are still level 8.

---

Hopefully this will shut some people up, even though supercell did comment on the matter, people didn't want to believe it. This will cause quite the storm on the forums.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Godzilla86

As said many many many times before: they don't get removed but they get pushed back in queue so far so that they are technically removed.

Got pics of a base that hasn't been attacked in 20 days.

Apperently once in a while they slips such old bases back into the queue.

---

I know that, but some still don't. and this base been inactive more than 20 months ago not 20 days :D

Edit: also, it's like the title suggest, about the proof which was never available before other than SC statements.

Inactives just get pushed back, not removed. It's not that strange at all to find one of them every 4 hrs or so... :rolleyes:

But congrats eh :cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fette

Inactives just get pushed back, not removed. It's not that strange at all to find one of them every 4 hrs or so... :rolleyes:

But congrats eh :cool:

---

thx

Don't get me wrong, I get inactives alot, but these usually been inactive for an update or two. but I don't think you can find a base that been inactive for at leasts 20 months every 4 hours. I actually think this is the first I ever stumble on a base that old (been inactive since update ver 4.14)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mavios

thx

Don't get me wrong, I get inactives alot, but these usually been inactive for an update or two. but I don't think you can find a base that been inactive for at leasts 20 months every 4 hours. I actually think this is the first I ever stumble on a base that old (been inactive since update ver 4.14)

---

It's not really that uncommon.

But how many bases you see with unclicked Christmass presents from last year's Santa trap? One once in a while but others are pushed back so far you don't see them.

So they are technically right when they say inactives aren't removed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Godzilla86

It's not really that uncommon.

But how many bases you see with unclicked Christmass presents from last year's Santa trap? One once in a while but others are pushed back so far you don't see them.

So they are technically right when they say inactives aren't removed.

---

I'm not sure I understand your logic,
so you are saying an inactive base that hasn't been active since 20 months ago is not that uncommon? but a base with presents from 12 months ago is uncommon?

and yes they are right, but no one provided a proof before. not that I know of.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mavios

I'm not sure I understand your logic,
so you are saying an inactive base that hasn't been active since 20 months ago is not that uncommon? but a base with presents from 12 months ago is uncommon?

and yes they are right, but no one provided a proof before. not that I know of.

---

No no,

I was trying to say that once every while you see one of those bases, so it's a fact that they aren't completely removed from the search queue.

But the fact you hardly ever see bases with unclicked presents proves a lot of bases are pushed back really far.
Technically they aren't removed, but in practice the result is the same.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Godzilla86

No no,

I was trying to say that once every while you see one of those bases, so it's a fact that they aren't completely removed from the search queue.

But the fact you hardly ever see bases with unclicked presents proves a lot of bases are pushed back really far.
Technically they aren't removed, but in practice the result is the same.

---

unclicked christams presents doesn't not mean the base been inactive for so long. I know a friend of mine who on his mini account still got the presents from last year and he is been using his mini in clan wars. so stumbling on these doesn't mean anything really.