Deathmatch option for Clan wars

Hello, this might be a not so good idea. But I'm thinking of a deathmatch where a player can attack multiple warbase consecutively. It means that if he attack a warbase and he still got some army left including spells, those troops will be brought to the next base where they can attack again. If he defeat the second base, then the troops left will be brought to another one. The limitations I think of about this are as follows:

1. Attacker initial attack should be on the same rank. (#1 might attack #25 and his army might last up to #50 if lucky).
2. Successive attacks will be in ascending order. (if #1 defeat #1 then his leftover troops will attack #2.)
3. Each player will be allowed one attack only.
4. A defeated warbase will be skipped if lower rank allies defeated the enemy before him.
5. Skipping starred warbase (1 or 2 stars) is optional to the attacker.

That would just throw an ultimate twist in the story! :p

So, if half a base remains unspoiled after one attack, are those defenses going to pup up in bases nearby to protect from the remaining troops of the attackers?

Ummm... where to start.

So if I am number 1, I can use my leftover troops from war on the next base down?

Maybe it is just me, but when I attack, I attack a base that is at my level, aka, one that I am NOT going to three star with half an army (hell probably not with a full army!).

So how would this benefit clans and clan wars? So I am number 2 in my clan, a slightly premie TH 10. I can normally 2-3 star TH 9's and TH 10's (depending on their layout, using my entire army).

But if this were implemented (which it will not be) now I have incentive to go and attack their number 15 and hope to wipe out the bottom half of their base? Who do the low people in my clan attack? Am I quitting after just one star to get loot?

This idea incentivizes selfish players to maximize their profits at risk of losing the clan war, taking the targets of the lower clan members, by seeing how many 1 stars someone can get with one army.

Don't like it, thumbs down

This would be interesting to say the least, and I for one would like to see how it would play out.

I always thought, well if you defeat 70% of the base, it would be kinda cool if there's only 30% then left standing for the next guy. Of course, this makes it too easy for someone else to come in and get the third star, but if each player only has 1 attack, there's a lot more strategy involved.

To the remark about selfish players...it wouldn't make much difference I dont think...I'm might get 400k for getting 2-3 stars on my level, or I could drop down to where the bases are 200k, but I'm still probably going to need half my army on each base.


Not that I see this happening ever, but the trickiest part is programming. Do you have to use your whole army at once, for instance? (My guess is yes). Could 2 players launch a coordinated attack on the same base at the same time? (Would let 2 TH8s have a chance of 3 starring a TH10 for example, perhaps with some troops left over).

Or in a clan with 30 TH4's or whatever and one max TH10, the max TH10 can steamroll 30 bases....