Allow builder to attack Obstacles during an attack.

I searched and didn't find this idea.

Allow users to assign an idle builder to their army (housing space 5?). When attacking if they drop their builder it attacks its first preference, obstacles. If it clears an obstacle the attacker receives a percentage of the experience points or gems for that obstacle. If their builder is killed during the attack, they must revive it using their own gems. By using gems to revive your builder will add risk for the attacker to use a builder plus whatever housing space it would use.

This could promote another way for users to use gems but also give them a chance to earn some gems too, Supercell could do the math to make it work for both the company and the user.

thoughts, suggestions?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BJackman

I searched and didn't find this idea.

Allow users to assign an idle builder to their army (housing space 5?). When attacking if they drop their builder it attacks its first preference, obstacles. If it clears an obstacle the attacker receives a percentage of the experience points or gems for that obstacle. If their builder is killed during the attack, they must revive it using their own gems. By using gems to revive your builder will add risk for the attacker to use a builder plus whatever housing space it would use.

This could promote another way for users to use gems but also give them a chance to earn some gems too, Supercell could do the math to make it work for both the company and the user.

thoughts, suggestions?

---

People that have the forest around the border of there base or people that have been saving holiday obsticals from the beginning of the game would be extremely mad, me included

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BJackman

I searched and didn't find this idea.

Allow users to assign an idle builder to their army (housing space 5?). When attacking if they drop their builder it attacks its first preference, obstacles. If it clears an obstacle the attacker receives a percentage of the experience points or gems for that obstacle. If their builder is killed during the attack, they must revive it using their own gems. By using gems to revive your builder will add risk for the attacker to use a builder plus whatever housing space it would use.

This could promote another way for users to use gems but also give them a chance to earn some gems too, Supercell could do the math to make it work for both the company and the user.

thoughts, suggestions?

---

IMO it's a stupid idea. First off, it's called a "Builder" for a reason, not a "Destroyer".
Also, what would it benefit for you? Most people generally rid obstacles themselves, and it's pointless for you to do the work for them.
Sorry, but no support.

no cause people would just search for gem boxes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BattleBorn007

People that have the forest around the border of there base or people that have been saving holiday obsticals from the beginning of the game would be extremely mad, me included

---

This. I would only support this idea IF the defender gets all the gems and Experience and holiday obstacles and gem boxes can't be attacked.

Also all troops Die instantly if the builder is put down and no troops can be placed in the time the builder is doing work. Also if the builder dies he can never be used again and if you lose all five builders you lose clash and must start over from lvl 1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CoconutTree

IMO it's a stupid idea. First off, it's called a "Builder" for a reason, not a "Destroyer".
Also, what would it benefit for you? Most people generally rid obstacles themselves, and it's pointless for you to do the work for them.
Sorry, but no support.

---

Your"destroyer" I mean builder clears obstacles on your own base so why not others. Many people don't clear obstacles so you can steal their experience pts/gems they have built up over time. Special holiday obstacles could be protected from being raided.

I see see the forests that people have built up over time as a resource for gems not an annoyance.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by firestar123

This. I would only support this idea IF the defender gets all the gems and Experience and holiday obstacles and gem boxes can't be attacked.

Also all troops Die instantly if the builder is put down and no troops can be placed in the time the builder is doing work. Also if the builder dies he can never be used again and if you lose all five builders you lose clash and must start over from lvl 1

---

This would take missclicks to a whole new level
-Accidentally drops builder- NOOOOOOOO

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BJackman

Your"destroyer" I mean builder clears obstacles on your own base so why not others. Many people don't clear obstacles so you can steal their experience pts/gems they have built up over time. Special holiday obstacles could be protected from being raided.

I see see the forests that people have built up over time as a resource for gems not an annoyance.

---

It's just an overall stupid idea. You shouldn't be able to steal those from others, because it's theirs. We can already take 3 out of all 4 currency's from users, so why should we take all of theirs?

Gem Farming will never become a thing. Sub-200 will be swarmed with people looking for cheap way to get gems from inactives

In other words, risk getting your builder killed so that you can
A.) Waste gems
B.) Destroy everyone's Christmas Trees
and
C.) Get an entire 1 or 2 XP per battle. You said it's only a percentage gained.